Clinical trials: Skin Closure
Skin Closure of Surgical Incisions by Tissue Glue vs Suture
Tissue Glue (Cyanoacrylate) Versus Conventional Suture in Kidney Donors
By means of a prospective, randomised trial the investigators want to examine skin closure in living donors - subjected to laparoscopic, hand-assisted nephrectomy - by tissue glue (Cyanoacrylate (Liquiband)) versus conventional…
- Trial name
- TG-CYANO (NCT01521871)
- Testing
- Skin wound closure by tissue glue, Skin wound closure by conventional suture + dressing
- Where
- Norway
- Volunteers
- 64 people
- Sponsor
- Oslo University Hospital
Macromastia
Study of Prineo (Dermabond Protape) Versus Sutures in Breast Procedures
This is a prospective, controlled, randomized, multi-center clinical study of up to 80 patients with full thickness surgical incisions associated with bi-lateral breast procedures.
- Trial name
- NCT00558246
- Testing
- Dermabond Protape (Prineo), Suture
- Where
- 5 sites in Belgium, Germany and 2 more
- Volunteers
- 79 people
- Sponsor
- Ethicon, Inc.
Diabetic Foot Ulcer
Comparing Synthetic Hybrid-Scale Fiber Matrix With Standard of Care in Treating Diabetic Foot Ulcers
The purpose of the following prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial is to compare synthetic hybrid-scale fiber matrix (Restrata®, Acera Surgical, Inc.) with standard of care in treating diabetic foot ulcers in human…
- Trial name
- NCT04918784
- Testing
- Restrata®, Wound Dressing
- Where
- United States
- Volunteers
- 46 people
- Sponsor
- Acera Surgical, Inc.
Wound, Cardiac Arrhythmia
ZIPS Study - Zip Incision aPproximation vs. Suture
ZipLine Medical, Inc. has developed a novel, non-invasive skin closure device called "Zip Surgical Skin Closure" to replace sutures, staples and glue for closure of the skin layer for surgical incisions or laceration repair.
- Trial name
- ZIPS (NCT02213510)
- Testing
- Zip Surgical Skin Closure Device, Standard Suture Closure
- Where
- United States
- Volunteers
- 40 people
- Sponsor
- University of California, San Diego
Wounds
Oleogel-S10 in Wound Healing of Split-Thickness Skin Graft Donor Sites (BSG-12)
The main purpose of this phase III clinical trial was to show safety and efficacy of Oleogel-S10 in accelerating the wound healing of Split-Thickness Skin Graft (STSG) donor sites.
- Trial name
- BSG-12 (NCT01807650)
- Testing
- Oleogel-S10, non-adhesive wound dressing, Non-adhesive wound dressing only
- Where
- 14 sites in France, Greece and 2 more
- Volunteers
- 112 people
- Sponsor
- Birken AG
Wounds
Oleogel-S10 in Wound Healing of Split-Thickness Skin Graft Donor Sites (BSH-12)
The main purpose of this phase III clinical trial was to compare intra-individually the efficacy, safety and tolerability of Oleogel-S10 and non-adhesive wound dressing versus non-adhesive wound dressing only in accelerating the…
- Trial name
- NCT01657305
- Testing
- Oleogel-S10, non-adhesive wound dressing, Non-adhesive wound dressing only
- Where
- 24 sites in Austria, Bulgaria and 4 more
- Volunteers
- 107 people
- Sponsor
- Birken AG
Lacerations
Study to Show Equivalence of DERMABOND PROTAPE to DERMABOND HVD for Wound Closure
This is a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled study for the purpose of comparing DERMABOND PROTAPE to DERMABOND HVD for closure of wounds in the Emergency Department.
- Trial name
- NCT00547638
- Testing
- cyanoacrylate with pressure sensitive mesh, cyanoacrylate
- Where
- 9 sites in United States
- Volunteers
- 216 people
- Sponsor
- Ethicon, Inc.
Port-A-Cath Placement, Octylcyanoacrylate
Comparison of Topical Skin Adhesive to Subcuticular Suture Closure of Implantable Port Incisions
Hypothesis is that incision closure with octylcyanoacrylate is inferior to closure with stitches in Port a Cath patients, who, as a population, are at increased risk for complications.
- Trial name
- NCT02212977
- Testing
- Octylcyanoacrylate, Suture
- Where
- United States
- Volunteers
- 109 people
- Sponsor
- Duke University
Arthroplasty, Knee Replacement, Wound Healing
Zip® Surgical Skin Closure Device vs. Staples for Skin Closure in Subjects Having Undergone Bilateral Knee Arthroplasty
Study designed to compare the Zip Surgical Skin Closure device vs. conventional staples for wound closure following bi lateral knee replacement surgery.
- Trial name
- NCT02460172
- Testing
- Zip Surgical Skin Closure, Steel Staples
- Where
- United States
- Volunteers
- 25 people, healthy volunteers welcome
- Sponsor
- ZipLine Medical Inc.
Cesarean Section, Pregnancy
INSORB Versus Subcuticular Sutures at Cesarean Section
The proposed study is a randomized controlled trial with two arms. All patients admitted to Labor and Delivery at Johns Hopkins Hospital for delivery will be approached and offered entry into our study.
- Trial name
- NCT01687972
- Testing
- Insorb absorbable staples, Absorbable sutures
- Where
- United States
- Volunteers
- 187 people
- Sponsor
- Johns Hopkins University
Operative Time, Wound Heal
Subcuticular Absorbable Staples Versus Conventional Skin Closure in Women Undergoing Cesarean Delivery
Despite the high numbers of cesareans being performed, scientific evidence behind which surgical techniques are best remains uncertain.
- Trial name
- NCT05112640
- Testing
- INSORB: subcuticular stapling device, Subcuticular monocryl suture manufactured by Ethicon
- Where
- United States
- Volunteers
- 117 people, healthy volunteers welcome
- Sponsor
- The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston
Complications; Cesarean Section, Surgical Wound Infection
Subcuticular Suture for Cesarean Skin Incision Closure
A comparison of the type of suture used for cesarean skin incision approximation and the subsequent rate of wound complications has not been widely studied.
- Trial name
- NCT02459093
- Testing
- poliglecaprone 25 suture, polyglactin 910 suture
- Where
- 2 sites in United States
- Volunteers
- 550 people
- Sponsor
- Montefiore Medical Center
Breast Hypertrophy, Abdominal Elastosis
Randomized Controlled Trial of Subcuticular Skin Closure Versus Steri-strip S Closure
Purpose: The aims of this randomized clinical trial are: 1. to assess scar quality from the patient and surgeon perspectives 2. to assess patient comfort in the days immediately following surgery 3.
- Conditions
- Breast Hypertrophy, Abdominal Elastosis, Breast Reconstruction
- Trial name
- NCT00727025
- Testing
- wound closure device (Steri-Strip™)
- Where
- United States
- Volunteers
- 51 people
- Sponsor
- Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
Pregnancy, Cesarean Section
Comparison of Staples Versus Prolene Suture for Skin Closure at Cesarean Delivery
Currently different materials are used to close the skin after a cesarean delivery, including absorbable suture, non-absorbable suture and staples.
- Trial name
- NCT01509950
- Testing
- Staples, Prolene non-absorbable sutures, Absorbable Sutures
- Where
- United States
- Volunteers
- 15 people
- Sponsor
- Stanford University
OsteoArthritis Knee
A Comparison of 2-octyl Cyanoacrylate Skin Adhesive and Polyester Mesh for Wound Closure in Total Knee Arthroplasty, A Randomized Controlled Study
The goal of this randomized controlled study is to investigate the Efficacy of Using skin adhesive (Dermabond) and skin adhesive with polyester mesh (Dermabond Prineo )for Wound Closure in Total Knee Arthroplasty, The main…
- Trial name
- NCT06232018
- Testing
- Skin adhesive (Dermabond), skin adhesive + polyester mesh (Dermabond prineo)
- Where
- Thailand
- Volunteers
- 80 people, healthy volunteers welcome
- Sponsor
- Pooriwat Lertsurawat
Wound Healing
Comparison of Two Methods of Securing Skin Grafts Using Negative Pressure Wound Therapy: Vacuum Assisted Closure (VAC) and Gauze Suction (GSUC)
The purpose of this study is to compare how well two methods (VAC and G-SUC) of securing skin grafts using negative pressure wound therapy work.
- Trial name
- NCT00952120
- Testing
- GSUC, VAC
- Where
- United States
- Volunteers
- 104 people, healthy volunteers welcome
- Sponsor
- University of Chicago
Wounds and Injuries, Lacerations
A Clinical Study to Compare MAR-CUTIS With Dermabond Advanced
This was a randomized, open-label, multicenter, comparator-controlled clinical study to compare MAR-CUTIS with Dermabond Advanced in closure of surgical incisions and lacerations less than or equal to (<=)15 centimeter (cm).
- Conditions
- Wounds and Injuries, Lacerations, Surgical Incision
- Trial name
- NCT03688880
- Testing
- MAR-CUTIS, Dermabond Advanced
- Where
- 19 sites in France, Germany and 2 more
- Volunteers
- 107 people
- Sponsor
- Grünenthal GmbH
Wound
Staples Versus Suture for Cesarean Wound Closure
The objective of this randomized controlled trial is to compare wound morbidity (including disruption and infection) in surgical staples versus absorbable subcuticular suture for wound closure in cesarean deliveries.
- Trial name
- SVS (NCT01008449)
- Testing
- Surgical staples, Absorbable Surgical Suture
- Where
- United States
- Volunteers
- 398 people
- Sponsor
- University of Alabama at Birmingham
Traumatic Lacerations or Surgical Incisions
Safety and Efficacy Study of BondEase to Treat Traumatic Lacerations and Surgical Incisions
To demonstrate that BondEase™ and conventional wound closure devices (CWCD) are the same in terms of cosmesis (appearance) of the repaired wound when these devices are used for closure of surgical and traumatic wounds .
- Trial name
- NCT01716013
- Testing
- BondEase, CWCD
- Where
- 6 sites in United States
- Volunteers
- 162 people
- Sponsor
- OptMed, Inc.
Cesarean Section
A Comparison of Metallic Staples Versus Absorbable Staples After a Cesarean Section (C-Section)
The purpose of the study is to compare post operative pain, cost effectiveness, speed of closure and patient satisfaction of Pfannenstiel incisions closed with metallic staples versus absorbable staples (Insorb) after Cesarean…
- Trial name
- NCT01198691
- Testing
- Insorb absorbable staples, Insorb
- Where
- United States
- Volunteers
- 100 people, healthy volunteers welcome
- Sponsor
- TriHealth Inc.