AzTrials
AzTrials

Hirschsprung DiseaseNCT02216994

A New Scoring System Improves Diagnostic Accuracy of Intestinal Dysganglionosis --a Prospective Study

A study testing high dose lactulose, conservative treatment and paraffin oil in people with Hirschsprung Disease, run by Tongji Hospital at 1 site in China.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

1. The investigators previously reported a simple diagnostic scoring system to differentiate Hirschsprung disease (HD) from Hirschsprung disease allied disorders (HAD) in the patients with suspected intestinal dysganglionosis. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 1 day to 3 years
Conditions the study is for
Hirschsprung Disease
What is being tested?
high dose lactulose, conservative treatment and paraffin oil
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
80 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
Jan 2013to Jun 2015
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 1 day to 3 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Hard or firm stools for 2 or less per week
  • Age are from newborn to 3 years old

Who cannot join

  • Children>3 years of age
  • Patients presented severe inflammation or malnutrition, unconsciousness or perforation of intestine

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Tongji Hospital

    Wuhan, Hubei, 430030

    Hongyi Zhang, MD, 27-83665209 ext. 01186, zhanghongyidoc@gmail.com

    Jiexiong Feng, MD,PhD

    Recruiting

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Efficacy and Accuracy of a New Diagnostic Scoring System to Differentiate Hirschsprung Disease From Hirschsprung Disease Allied Disorders in the Patients With Suspected Intestinal Dysganglinosis: a Prospective Study

  1. The investigators previously reported a simple diagnostic scoring system to differentiate Hirschsprung disease (HD) from Hirschsprung disease allied disorders (HAD) in the patients with suspected intestinal dysganglionosis. In the retrospective study, the investigators concluded that the patients with a predicting score of more than 5 are more likely to be diagnosed with HD, whereas a score less than 5 is mostly indicative of HAD.
  2. Since it is essential to confirm the accuracy and efficacy of the scoring system in a prospective manner before it is used as a standard procedure, this prospective study is designed and performed.
Read the detailed description
  1. Patients have hard or firm stools for 2 or less per week, and with ages from newborn to 3 years old are recruited in this study.
  2. The recruited patients is undergoing preoperative work-up including barium enema (BE), anorectal manometry (ARM) and histochemical acetylcholinesterase (AChE) staining of rectal mucosa. Known risk factors for intestinal dysganglionosis (IDs) are recorded. The predicting score is calculated by summing the scores of the risk factors and 3 preoperative tests.
  3. The patients with a predicting score of more than 5 are diagnosed with HD, and are performed surgery to remove the aganglionic bowel.
  4. The patients with a score less than 5 are mostly indicative of HAD, and receive conservative therapies that included colonic irrigation, enema, high dose lactulose, and oral paraffin oil for at least 6 months. When there is no clinical improvement, patients are consented for surgical procedures to remove the dysganglionic bowel segments.
Being tested
high dose lactulose, conservative treatment, paraffin oil
Keywords
Intestinal dysganglinosis, Hirschsprung disease, Hirschsprung disease allied disorders, diagnostic scoring system, Prospective study
Medical subject headings
Hirschsprung Disease

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • high dose lactuloseDrug

    Also called Duphalac®

    The patients with a score less than 5 are mostly indicative of HAD, and receive conservative therapies that included colonic irrigation, enema, high dose lactulose, and oral paraffin oil for at least 6 months. When there is no clinical improvement, patients are consented for surgical procedures to remove the dysganglionic bowel segments.

  • conservative treatmentBehavioural

    Also called colonic irrigation

    The patients with a score less than 5 are mostly indicative of HAD, and receive conservative therapies that included colonic irrigation, enema, high dose lactulose, and oral paraffin oil for at least 6 months. When there is no clinical improvement, patients are consented for surgical procedures to remove the dysganglionic bowel segments.

  • paraffin oilDrug

    Also called Shilayou®

    The patients with a score less than 5 are mostly indicative of HAD, and receive conservative therapies that included colonic irrigation, enema, high dose lactulose, and oral paraffin oil for at least 6 months. When there is no clinical improvement, patients are consented for surgical procedures to remove the dysganglionic bowel segments.

Study groups in NCT02216994
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
surgery treatmentOtherThe patients with a predicting score of more than 5 are diagnosed with HD, and are performed surgery to remove the aganglionic bowel. The patients with a score less than 5 are mostly indicative of HAD, and receive conservative treatments that included colonic irrigation, enema, high dose lactulose, and oral paraffin oil for at least 6 months. When there is no clinical improvement, patients are consented for surgical procedures to remove the dysganglionic bowel segments. one stage pull through procedure to remove the dysganglionic bowel segments.
Receives: Drug: high dose lactulose; Behavioral: conservative treatment; Drug: paraffin oil

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. the predicting score calculation

    The recruited patients is undergoing preoperative work-up including barium enema (BE), anorectal manometry (ARM) and histochemical acetylcholinesterase (AChE) staining of rectal mucosa. Known risk factors for IDs are recorded. The predicting score is calculated by summing the scores of the risk factors and 3 preoperative tests.

    The patients with a predicting score of more than 5 are diagnosed with HD, and are performed surgery to remove the aganglionic bowel.

    The patients with a score less than 5 are mostly indicative of HAD, and receive conservative therapies that included colonic irrigation, enema, high dose lactulose, and oral paraffin oil for at least 6 months. When there is no clinical improvement, patients are consented for surgical procedures to remove the dysganglionic bowel segments.

    Measured: 6-12 months

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. pathological diagnosis

    The intestinal specimens were reviewed by 3 experienced pathologists all of whom had participated in a consensus meeting on diagnostic criteria of IDs.

    Measured: 12-18 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Aug 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2013
  3. Primary completionDec 2014 (estimated)
  4. Study completionJun 2015 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
80 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02216994
Sponsor's protocol ID
TJCD-D-13-00074
Other IDs
tj2014701
Status last verified
Oct 2014
First submitted
6 Aug 2014
Last updated
28 Oct 2014
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing high dose lactulose, conservative treatment and paraffin oil in people with Hirschsprung Disease, run by Tongji Hospital at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Oct 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Hongyi Zhang, MD (27-83665209 ext. 01186, zhanghongyidoc@foxmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

the predicting score calculation (time frame: 6-12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Oct 2014.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in