Clear Cell Renal CancerNCT02499458
Prospective Validation of Circulating Tumor Cells & Circulating Endothelial Cells as Biomarkers in Renal Cancer
An observational study of Clear Cell Renal Cancer and Circulating Tumor Cells, run by London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) have prognostic value in several tumor types, and increasing evidence suggests that molecular characterization of CTCs can serve as a "liquid biopsy" to understand and address treatment resistance. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Clear Cell Renal Cancer, Circulating Tumor Cells, Circulating Endothelial Cells
- What is being tested?
- None- observational study
- How many people
- 44 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- Nov 2014to Dec 2018
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Oncology care centre
Who may be able to join
- ECOG performance status 0-2
- Age over 18 years
- Diagnosed renal cancer with clear cell histology
- Metastatic disease
- Predicted life expectancy over 2 months
- Targeted treatment with an anti-VEGF or anti-mTOR agent as first or second line therapy
- Standard imaging evaluation 4 weeks prior to inclusion
- Planned for standard imaging within 16 weeks after start of therapy
Who cannot join
- Presence of substantial comorbidities (uncontrolled heart or respiratory dysfunction, severe renal or hepatic impairment [Cl Cr below 30ml/h OR Bb>3X ULN])
- History of a malignancy other than non-melanoma skin cancer in the previous 5 years
- Any other contraindication to targeted treatments.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Prospective Validation of Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCs) and Circulating Endothelial Cells (CECs) as Prognostic Biomarkers in Clear Cell Renal Cancer
Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) have prognostic value in several tumor types, and increasing evidence suggests that molecular characterization of CTCs can serve as a "liquid biopsy" to understand and address treatment resistance. The goal of this proposal is to demonstrate that CTCs can be accurately enumerated and characterized in metastatic clear cell renal cancer (CCRC) and can serve as prognostic/predictive biomarkers to improve treatment. The challenge surrounding CTC analysis in CCRC is that most CTC technologies (including the clinical gold-standard CellSearch®) depend in epithelial markers such as EpCAM that are expressed at low or heterogeneous levels in CCRC. Members of the research team have developed a novel CTC microfluidic technology that can effectively detect CTCs that are completely undetectable by CellSearch® because of very low EpCAM expression, as well as allowing for CTC recovery for downstream molecular characterization. The goal of this proposal is therefore to test the hypotheses that (1) The microfluidics CTC technology will have better sensitivity/specificity relative to the CellSearch in metastatic CCRC; and (2) Enumeration of CTCs in metastatic CCRC patients (n=66) will have prognostic value, while molecular characterization of CTCs for expression of biomarkers (VHL, VEGF, mTOR, HIF1/HIF2, AKT) related to CCRC etiology will be predictive of response/resistance to targeted therapies. Although CCRC is relatively uncommon, the lack of established adjuvant treatments and high cost of targeted therapies in the palliative setting makes the search for new prognostic/predictive biomarkers an important clinical goal.
- Conditions
- Clear Cell Renal Cancer, Circulating Tumor Cells, Circulating Endothelial Cells, Prognostic Biomarkers, Predictive Biomarkers
- Being tested
- None- observational study
- Medical subject headings
- Neoplastic Cells, Circulating
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
None- observational studyOther
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Sensitivity/specificity of CTC enumeration (microfluidics vs CellSearch)
For comparison of the 2 CTC platforms, a Bland-Altman plot will be constructed. This plot is superior to standard correlation statistics in that it assesses agreement rather than association. Initially we will use a Chi-Square test to compare the 2 methods at a cutoff point of ≥5 versus <5 CTCs/7.5mL, with simple comparison of PFS at this level. As the cut-off point may not be the same for each method, we will also compare the methods using simple 2X2 contingency tables.
Measured: 24 months
Progression free survival (PFS).
Survival analysis will be performed by Kaplan Meier and significance analysis will use the log-rank test. Cox multivariate analysis will be performed to look at the number and molecular characteristics of CTCs as independent prognostic parameters of survival.
Measured: 24 months
Secondary outcomes (4)
Overall survival (OS)
Survival analysis will be performed by Kaplan Meier and significance analysis will use the log-rank test. Cox multivariate analysis will be performed to look at the number and molecular characteristics of CTCs as independent prognostic parameters of survival.
Measured: 24 months
Radiological response
Radiological assessment of disease status will be carried out as standard-of-care and subjected to correlative analysis relative to CTC status, PFS and OS.
Measured: within 16 weeks after start of study
Molecular characterization of CTCs
CTCs will be recovered from the microfluidics device and subjected to molecular characterization for expression of markers related to angiogenesis and hypoxia.
Measured: baseline, 4-6 weeks after start of therapy, 10-12 weeks after start of therapy, post-progression (up to 24 months)
Enumeration of CECs
CTCs will be enumerated on both the CellSearch and the novel microfluidic device.
Measured: baseline, 4-6 weeks after start of therapy, 10-12 weeks after start of therapy, post-progression (up to 24 months)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Jul 2015 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2014
- Primary completionDec 2018
- Study completionDec 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Clear Cell Renal CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph'sThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 44 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- London Health Sciences Centre, Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Alison Allan, London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's
- Investigators
- Alison L Allan, PhD, Principal investigator, London Health Sciences Centre
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02499458
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 105484
- Status last verified
- Dec 2019
- First submitted
- 10 Jul 2015
- Last updated
- 24 Dec 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Dec 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Prospective Validation of Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCs) and Circulating Endothelial Cells (CECs) as Prognostic Biomarkers in Clear Cell Renal Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02499458
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 105484
- Conditions
- Clear Cell Renal Cancer, Circulating Tumor Cells, Circulating Endothelial Cells, Prognostic Biomarkers, Predictive Biomarkers
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 44 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph'sUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- London Health Sciences Centre, Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation
- Study start
- Nov 2014
- Primary completion
- Dec 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 16 Jul 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) have prognostic value in several tumor types, and increasing evidence suggests that molecular characterization of CTCs can serve as a "liquid biopsy" to understand and address treatment resistance. The goal of this proposal is to demonstrate that CTCs can be accurately enumerated and characterized in metastatic clear cell renal cancer (CCRC) and can serve as prognostic/predictive biomarkers to improve treatment. The challenge surrounding CTC analysis in CCRC is that most CTC technologies (including the clinical gold-standard CellSearch®) depend in epithelial markers such as EpCAM that are expressed at low or heterogeneous levels in CCRC. Members of the research team have developed a novel CTC microfluidic technology that can effectively detect CTCs that are completely undetectable by CellSearch® because of very low EpCAM expression, as well as allowing for CTC recovery for downstream molecular characterization. The goal of this proposal is therefore to test the hypotheses that (1) The microfluidics CTC technology will have better sensitivity/specificity relative to the CellSearch in metastatic CCRC; and (2) Enumeration of CTCs in metastatic CCRC patients (n=66) will have prognostic value, while molecular characterization of CTCs for expression of biomarkers (VHL, VEGF, mTOR, HIF1/HIF2, AKT) related to CCRC etiology will be predictive of response/resistance to targeted therapies. Although CCRC is relatively uncommon, the lack of established adjuvant treatments and high cost of targeted therapies in the palliative setting makes the search for new prognostic/predictive biomarkers an important clinical goal.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Oncology care centre
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- ECOG performance status 0-2
- Age over 18 years
- Diagnosed renal cancer with clear cell histology
- Metastatic disease
- Predicted life expectancy over 2 months
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Presence of substantial comorbidities (uncontrolled heart or respiratory dysfunction, severe renal or hepatic impairment [Cl Cr below 30ml/h OR Bb>3X ULN])
- History of a malignancy other than non-melanoma skin cancer in the previous 5 years
- Any other contraindication to targeted treatments.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| None- observational study | Other | – |
Primary outcome
Sensitivity/specificity of CTC enumeration (microfluidics vs CellSearch)
Time frame: 24 months
For comparison of the 2 CTC platforms, a Bland-Altman plot will be constructed. This plot is superior to standard correlation statistics in that it assesses agreement rather than association. Initially we will use a Chi-Square test to compare the 2 methods at a cutoff point of ≥5 versus <5 CTCs/7.5mL, with simple comparison of PFS at this level. As the cut-off point may not be the same for each method, we will also compare the methods using simple 2X2 contingency tables.
Progression free survival (PFS).
Time frame: 24 months
Survival analysis will be performed by Kaplan Meier and significance analysis will use the log-rank test. Cox multivariate analysis will be performed to look at the number and molecular characteristics of CTCs as independent prognostic parameters of survival.
4 secondary outcomes
Overall survival (OS)
Time frame: 24 months
Radiological response
Time frame: within 16 weeks after start of study
Molecular characterization of CTCs
Time frame: baseline, 4-6 weeks after start of therapy, 10-12 weeks after start of therapy, post-progression (up to 24 months)
Enumeration of CECs
Time frame: baseline, 4-6 weeks after start of therapy, 10-12 weeks after start of therapy, post-progression (up to 24 months)
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Dec 2019.
Related trials for Clear Cell Renal Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Pazopanib Hydrochloride in Treating Patients With Metastatic Kidney Cancer Who Have No Evidence of Disease After Surgery
Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma, Stage IV Renal Cell Cancer AJCC v7
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
AB-2100, an Integrated Circuit T Cell Therapy in Patients With Recurrent Clear-cell Renal Cell Carcinoma (ccRCC)
Advanced/Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma, Recurrence
RecruitingPhase 2
Prospective Study of Cadonilimab With Lenvatinib in Renal Cell Carcinoma
Renal Cell Carcinoma (Kidney Cancer), Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 1/2
A Trial to Find Out if REGN5678 (Nezastomig) is Safe and How Well it Works Alone or in Combination With Cemiplimab for Adult Participants With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer and Other Tumors
Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC), Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma (ccRCC)
RecruitingPhase 1
A Phase 1 Study of AB521 Monotherapy and Combination Therapies in Renal Cell Carcinoma and Other Solid Tumors
Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma, Solid Tumors
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Alison L Allan, PhD principal investigator
London Health Sciences Centre
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Clear Cell Renal Cancer and Circulating Tumor Cells, run by London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Dec 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Sensitivity/specificity of CTC enumeration (microfluidics vs CellSearch) (time frame: 24 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Dec 2019.