AzTrials
AzTrials

Chronic Kidney DiseaseADIFENCT03385902

Assessment of Dialysis Initiation by a Fuzzy Mathematics Equation

A study testing optimal start time and late start time in people with Chronic Kidney Disease, run by The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University at 1 site in China.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of the optimal and late initiation of dialysis on the mortality and quality of life in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients by the Dialysis Initiation based on Fuzzy mathematics Equation (DIFE), which is a novel equation for the assessment of timing of dialysis… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 75 years
Conditions the study is for
Chronic Kidney Disease
What is being tested?
optimal start time and late start time
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
388 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
14 Apr 2018to 20 May 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Have progressive chronic kidney disease with an eGFR less than 15 ml/min/1.73m2 and a DIFE between 30-35
  • Expected to commence maintenance hemodialysis as their renal replacement treatment
  • Agreeable to randomization

Who cannot join

  • Acute kidney injury (AKI) or AKI on chronic kidney disease (CKD)
  • With the primary disease of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) or systemic vasculitis
  • Have received or planning to receive a kidney transplant or peritoneal dialysis during the study
  • Has a recently diagnosed cancer that was likely to affect survival (except for the following cases: the cancer has been confirmed to be cured or relieved for over 5 years, have had the radical resection for the basal cell carcinoma or squamous carcinoma of skin or carcinoma in-situ of any part of the body )
  • Hepatocirrhosis
  • Positive test of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), the hepatitis B virus antigen (HBsAg) or anti-hepatitis C virus antibody (HCV Ab)
Show all 12Show fewer
  • Acute infection within 1 month
  • Bad habit which is difficult to withdrawal such as alcohol abuse
  • Poor compliance and could not be treated according to the protocol
  • Being pregnant, nursing or having a plan for pregnancy
  • Life expectancy less than 1 year
  • The investigator confirm that should not enroll in the study with any other cases

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site
  • the First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University

    Dalian, Liaoning, 116011

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Impact on Mortality of Timing of Dialysis Initiation in Patients With End-stage Renal Disease by a Novel Assessment Based on Fuzzy Mathematics

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of the optimal and late initiation of dialysis on the mortality and quality of life in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients by the Dialysis Initiation based on Fuzzy mathematics Equation (DIFE), which is a novel equation for the assessment of timing of dialysis initiation established by Fuzzy mathematics.

Read the detailed description

The optimal time of dialysis initiation is still controversial. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) which is now widely used as the assessment of timing of dialysis is lack of specificity. Some clinical factors such as heart failure, volume overload, malnutrition also determine the dialysis time. But these subjective judgements do not have a standard. So there is no quantitative assessment of timing of dialysis initiation. The research team developed a novel equation named DIFE (Dialysis Initiation based on Fuzzy mathematics Equation) with data from a retrospective multicenter cohort by fuzzy mathematical methods to combine these clinical factors and lab indexes. The DIFE was confirmed to be more accurate and convenient to use in clinical practice than eGFR only at the assessment of dialysis initiation time in the internal validation. For further validation of the DIFE, the team will conduct a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Patients who need hemodialysis will be randomized to optimal start dailysis group or late start dailysis group by the assessment of the DIFE. Based on the comparison of the two groups, this trial will provide evidence for the optimal timing of dialysis initiation in patients with end-stage renal disease by the DIFE.

Being tested
optimal start time, late start time
Keywords
end-stage renal disease, timing of dialysis initiation, hemodialysis, fuzzy mathematics, glomerular filtration rate
Medical subject headings
Renal Insufficiency, Chronic, Kidney Failure, Chronic

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • optimal start timeOther

    patients will start hemodialysis when their DIFE reach 35, and can not wait if the DIFE decline to 30.

  • late start timeOther

    patients will start hemodialysis when their DIFE less than 30

Study groups in NCT03385902
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
optimal start dialysis groupExperimentalThe DIFE will be used as the assessment of initiation time of dialysis. Patients in this group will start dialysis when their results of the DIFE reaching to 30-35, which defined as the optimal start time.
Receives: Other: optimal start time
late start dialysis groupActive comparatorthe DIFE will be used as the assessment of initiation time of dialysis. Patients in this group will start dialysis when their results of the DIFE less than 30, which defined as late start time.
Receives: Other: late start time

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. all-cause mortality

    proportion of patients who die from any cause

    Measured: from the date of enrollment until the end of study, assessed up to 3 years

  2. cerebro-cardiovascular mortality

    proportion of patients who die from cerebro-cardiovascular disease

    Measured: 3 years, from the date of enrollment until the end of study

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. cerebro-cardiovascular events

    proportion of patients who suffer from cardiovascular events, which include nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, transient ischemic attack,new-onset angina, acute heart failure or severe arrhythmia.

    Measured: from the date of enrollment until the date of death from any cause, or the end of study, which ever came first, assessed up to 3 years

  2. hospitalization

    proportion of patients admitted to hospital

    Measured: from the date of enrollment until the date of death from any cause, or the end of study, which ever came first, assessed up to 3 years

  3. Nutrition assessment

    assess the patient's nutritional status by subjective global assessment (SGA) assessment and serum albumin level

    Measured: from the date of enrollment until the date of death from any cause, or the end of study, which ever came first, assessed up to 3 years

  4. the change of quality of life

    use short form-36 reported by the patients to assess the patient's quality of life

    Measured: from the date of enrollment until the date of death from any cause, or the end of study, which ever came first, assessed up to 3 years

  5. Medical cost

    the cost by the patient, family and insurance during treatment

    Measured: from the date of enrollment until the date of death from any cause, or the end of study, which ever came first, assessed up to 3 years

  6. Hemodialysis complications

    the proportion of patients who suffer from hemodialysis complications including blood assess revise, assess infection, severe fluid and electrolyte disorders

    Measured: from the date of enrollment until the date of death from any cause, or the end of study, which ever came first, assessed up to 3 years

  7. cognitive dysfunction

    assess cognitive dysfunction by Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)

    Measured: from the date of enrollment until the date of death from any cause, or the end of study, which ever came first, assessed up to 3 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted29 Dec 2017
  2. Study start14 Apr 2018
  3. Primary completion20 May 2024
  4. Study completion20 May 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
388 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03385902
Sponsor's protocol ID
YJ-KY-2017-119
Acronym
ADIFE
Status last verified
May 2026
First submitted
21 Dec 2017
Last updated
8 May 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Cooper BA, Branley P, Bulfone L, Collins JF, Craig JC, Fraenkel MB, Harris A, Johnson DW, Kesselhut J, Li JJ, Luxton G, Pilmore A, Tiller DJ, Harris DC, Pollock CA; IDEAL Study. A randomized, controlled trial of early versus late initiation of dialysis. N Engl J Med. 2010 Aug 12;363(7):609-19. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1000552. Epub 2010 Jun 27.

    PubMed 20581422
  • Crews DC, Scialla JJ, Boulware LE, Navaneethan SD, Nally JV Jr, Liu X, Arrigain S, Schold JD, Ephraim PL, Jolly SE, Sozio SM, Michels WM, Miskulin DC, Tangri N, Shafi T, Wu AW, Bandeen-Roche K; DEcIDE Network Patient Outcomes in End Stage Renal Disease Study Investigators. Comparative effectiveness of early versus conventional timing of dialysis initiation in advanced CKD. Am J Kidney Dis. 2014 May;63(5):806-15. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2013.12.010. Epub 2014 Feb 6.

    PubMed 24508475
  • Susantitaphong P, Altamimi S, Ashkar M, Balk EM, Stel VS, Wright S, Jaber BL. GFR at initiation of dialysis and mortality in CKD: a meta-analysis. Am J Kidney Dis. 2012 Jun;59(6):829-40. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2012.01.015. Epub 2012 Apr 1.

    PubMed 22465328
  • Nesrallah GE, Mustafa RA, Clark WF, Bass A, Barnieh L, Hemmelgarn BR, Klarenbach S, Quinn RR, Hiremath S, Ravani P, Sood MM, Moist LM; Canadian Society of Nephrology. Canadian Society of Nephrology 2014 clinical practice guideline for timing the initiation of chronic dialysis. CMAJ. 2014 Feb 4;186(2):112-7. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.130363. No abstract available.

    PubMed 24492525
  • Sood MM, Komenda P, Rigatto C, Hiebert B, Tangri N. The association of eGFR reporting with the timing of dialysis initiation. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014 Sep;25(9):2097-104. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2013090953. Epub 2014 Mar 20.

    PubMed 24652801
  • Hwang SJ, Yang WC, Lin MY, Mau LW, Chen HC; Taiwan Society of Nephrology. Impact of the clinical conditions at dialysis initiation on mortality in incident haemodialysis patients: a national cohort study in Taiwan. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2010 Aug;25(8):2616-24. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfq308. Epub 2010 Jun 2.

    PubMed 20519231
  • Chen J, Liu Y, Chen X, Sun X, Li W, Yang W, Li P, Sun X, Wang D, Jiang H, Shi W, Liu W, Fu P, Ding X, Chang M, Liu S, Yang X, Cao N, Chen M, Ni Z, Chen J, Sun S, Liang X, Wang H, He Y, Gao B, Wang J, Hao L, Liu J, Li S, He Q, Liu H, Yi N, Shao F, Jiao J, Ma Y, Yao L, Sun Y, Li D, Szczech L, Fang M, Odeh Z, Lin H. Assessment of dialysis initiation by a fuzzy mathematics equation (ADIFE): a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 8;9(9):e023162. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023162.

    PubMed 31501092

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing optimal start time and late start time in people with Chronic Kidney Disease, run by The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

all-cause mortality (time frame: from the date of enrollment until the end of study, assessed up to 3 years). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03385902, which also lists 7 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 May 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in