Cardiogenic ShockREVERSENCT03431467
Impella CP With VA ECMO for Cardiogenic Shock
A study testing Impella-CP LV Vent in people with Cardiogenic Shock, run by University of Pennsylvania at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Veno-arterial extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is indicated as a haemodynamic rescue strategy in decompensated acute or chronic heart failure presenting as cardiogenic shock. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Cardiogenic Shock
- What is being tested?
- Impella-CP LV Vent
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 17 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 19 Mar 2018to 1 Sep 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Cardiogenic shock: Including refractory to conventional therapy, including systolic blood pressure < 90mm Hg, Cardiac Index < 1.8 or a cardiac index < 2.0 on moderate to high doses of inotropes and vasopressors for greater than 30 mins, or systemic signs of tissue hypoxia.
- Post-acute myocardial infarction cardiogenic shock: excluding mechanical complications requiring surgical intervention after extracorpeal membrane oxygenator (ECMO) such as post-ischaemic ventricular septal defect (VSD).
- Drug overdose-induced cardiogenic shock.
- Early graft failure: post orthotropic heart transplantation cardiogenic shock, excluding immediate intra-operative failure.
- Acute on chronic cardiomyopathy with progressive shock and decompensation unresponsive to medical therapies.
Who cannot join
- Recent Significant Pulmonary Embolus
- Moderate to severe aortic valve insufficiency (AI)
- Ongoing significant sepsis
- Severe pulmonary hypertension \& shock
- Hypothermia
- Post-cardiotomy cardiogenic shock
Show all 21Show fewer
- Continuous cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) >20-30 minutes, except if neurological status is satisfactory
- Transfer from outside hospital on VA ECMO or with history of CPR
- Listed for cardiopulmonary transplantation or being evaluated for cardiopulmonary transplantation or permanent mechanical circulatory support
- Known or suspected chronic heart failure with echocardiogram documenting left ventricular diastolic diameter >6.5cm
- Known or suspected chronic heart failure with echocardiogram documenting left ventricular ejection fraction < 25%
- Mechanical aortic valve replacement
- Presence of left ventricular thrombus
- Pre-existing Impella 2.5, CP, 3.5 or 5.0
- Cardiogenic shock due to primary respiratory failure
- Mechanical complications requiring surgical intervention after ECMO such as post-ischaemic VSD.
- Severe liver failure
- Active malignancy
- Acute aortic dissection
- Intracranial hemorrhage
- Neurological injury including recent cerebrovascular accident or suspected severe neurologic injury
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Hospital of The University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104
About this study
Official title: A Prospective Randomised Trial of Early LV Venting Using Impella CP for Recovery in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Managed With VA ECMO
Veno-arterial extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is indicated as a haemodynamic rescue strategy in decompensated acute or chronic heart failure presenting as cardiogenic shock. It has been used across aeitologies including post-myocardial infarction, dilated cardiomyopathy, acute myocarditis and in post-cardiotomy shock. VA ECMO has a number of effects on the circulation including improved end-organ perfusion and possibly improved coronary perfusion, and is a bridge to further therapies including permanent advanced mechanical circulatory support, cardiac transplantation and to cardiac recovery.
Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) provide long-term mechanical circulatory support and also profoundly mechanically unload the left ventricle. Multiple clinical studies have documented cardiac recovery using LVAD therapy, with a rate between 10-60% in selected populations. A large body of basic science has documented the pivotal role of mechanical load in determining ventricular contractile performance across species. Therefore both clinical data and basic laboratory studies support the notion that profound ventricular unloading may result in improved cardiac performance through a variety of mechanisms ranging from triggered de novo cardiomyocyte proliferation, subcellular calcium handling reverse remodeling, changes to the extracellular matrix of the heart, reverse remodeling of the neurohormal milleu, amongst many others.
Read more
One of the major deficiencies of peripheral VA-ECMO is its lack of left ventricular unloading, with associated pulmonary congestion, which can derail clinical improvement and hamper cardiac recovery. Indeed, percutaneous VA-ECMO increases LV afterload due to the retrograde blood flow, and because of the lack of venting, there may be progressive LV distension. These conditions can result in a congested, pressure-overloaded ventricle, even in the absence of echocardiographic ventricular distension. This may be ameliorated with the addition of ventricular mechanical unloading using percutaneous therapies including the percutaneous left ventricular device, Impella CP.
On the platform of VA-ECMO, the addition of an Impella device to reduce ventricular loading results in improved survival and recovery of ventricular performance in the setting of cardiogenic shock. In a number of small studies, the use of additional means to unload the ventricle, principally Impella, results in cardiac recovery and less ventricular distension. In chronic heart failure, direct ventricular unloading is critical to cardiac recovery.
The objective of this randomized study is to determine whether the addition of early direct ventricular unloading using Impella CP leads to higher rates of cardiac recovery, defined as survival free from mechanical circulatory support, heart transplantation or inotropic support at thirty days. This study will also examine the clinical, biochemical, echocardiographic and radiologic effects of VA ECMO with and without the addition of Impella CP to directly vent the left ventricle to address adjunct important questions such as the effects on pulmonary congestion.
- Conditions
- Cardiogenic Shock
- Being tested
- Impella-CP LV Vent
- Keywords
- ECMO, Heart Failure, RCT, Mechanical unloading
- Medical subject headings
- Shock, Cardiogenic, Heart Failure
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Impella-CP LV VentDevice
Patients randomised to the experimental arm will have an Impella-CP implanted in addition to VA-ECMO within a maximum of 10 hours of institution of VA-ECMO
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Control | No intervention | VA-ECMO alone per standard clinical protocol. |
| Experimental | Experimental | VA-ECMO with early institution of Impella CP LV venting Receives: Device: Impella-CP LV Vent |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Recovery From Cardiogenic Shock.
The number of subjects treated with this standardized ECMO protocol with either (i) no additional therapy or (ii) Impella CP for LV mechanical unloading who experience myocardial recovery defined as: survival free from mechanical circulatory support, heart transplantation or inotropic support.
Measured: At forty five days.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Feb 2018
- Study start19 Mar 2018
- Primary completion1 Sep 2023
- Study completion1 Sep 2023
Why it stopped: lack of recruitment
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Cardiogenic ShockStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of PennsylvaniaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Randomised controlled trial at three U Penn Sites
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 17 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Pennsylvania
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Michael Ibrahim, University of Pennsylvania
- Investigators
- Christian Bermudez, MD, Principal investigator, University of PennsylvaniaMichael Ibrahim, MD PhD, Principal investigator, University of Pennsylvania
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03431467
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 828198
- Acronym
- REVERSE
- Status last verified
- Nov 2025
- First submitted
- 21 Jan 2018
- Last updated
- 19 Nov 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No: Deidentiifed data will be used within the research team
Publications
Moussa MD, Roux J, Jungling M, Ramdane N, Loobuyck V, Brassart B, Rousse N, Dupre C, Mugnier A, Khalipha A, Bardeesi ASA, Lukowiak O, Lefebvre L, Juthier F, Robin E, Labreuche J, Thellier L, Vincentelli A. Impella Versus Selective Biatrial Canulation for Left Ventricular Unloading During Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation. Cardiovasc Ther. 2026 Feb 8;2026:3669575. doi: 10.1155/cdr/3669575. eCollection 2026.
PubMed 41668891
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Nov 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Prospective Randomised Trial of Early LV Venting Using Impella CP for Recovery in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Managed With VA ECMO
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03431467
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- REVERSE / 828198
- Conditions
- Cardiogenic Shock
- Keywords
- ECMO, Heart Failure, RCT, Mechanical unloading
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: lack of recruitment
- Enrolment
- 17 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of PennsylvaniaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 19 Mar 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Sep 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Sep 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 13 Feb 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 19 Nov 2025
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Veno-arterial extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is indicated as a haemodynamic rescue strategy in decompensated acute or chronic heart failure presenting as cardiogenic shock. It has been used across aeitologies including post-myocardial infarction, dilated cardiomyopathy, acute myocarditis and in post-cardiotomy shock. VA ECMO has a number of effects on the circulation including improved end-organ perfusion and possibly improved coronary perfusion, and is a bridge to further therapies including permanent advanced mechanical circulatory support, cardiac transplantation and to cardiac recovery.
Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) provide long-term mechanical circulatory support and also profoundly mechanically unload the left ventricle. Multiple clinical studies have documented cardiac recovery using LVAD therapy, with a rate between 10-60% in selected populations. A large body of basic science has documented the pivotal role of mechanical load in determining ventricular contractile performance across species. Therefore both clinical data and basic laboratory studies support the notion that profound ventricular unloading may result in improved cardiac performance through a variety of mechanisms ranging from triggered de novo cardiomyocyte proliferation, subcellular calcium handling reverse remodeling, changes to the extracellular matrix of the heart, reverse remodeling of the neurohormal milleu, amongst many others.
One of the major deficiencies of peripheral VA-ECMO is its lack of left ventricular unloading, with associated pulmonary congestion, which can derail clinical improvement and hamper cardiac recovery. Indeed, percutaneous VA-ECMO increases LV afterload due to the retrograde blood flow, and because of the lack of venting, there may be progressive LV distension. These conditions can result in a congested, pressure-overloaded ventricle, even in the absence of echocardiographic ventricular distension. This may be ameliorated with the addition of ventricular mechanical unloading using percutaneous therapies including the percutaneous left ventricular device, Impella CP.
On the platform of VA-ECMO, the addition of an Impella device to reduce ventricular loading results in improved survival and recovery of ventricular performance in the setting of cardiogenic shock. In a number of small studies, the use of additional means to unload the ventricle, principally Impella, results in cardiac recovery and less ventricular distension. In chronic heart failure, direct ventricular unloading is critical to cardiac recovery.
The objective of this randomized study is to determine whether the addition of early direct ventricular unloading using Impella CP leads to higher rates of cardiac recovery, defined as survival free from mechanical circulatory support, heart transplantation or inotropic support at thirty days. This study will also examine the clinical, biochemical, echocardiographic and radiologic effects of VA ECMO with and without the addition of Impella CP to directly vent the left ventricle to address adjunct important questions such as the effects on pulmonary congestion.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Randomised controlled trial at three U Penn Sites
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Control | No intervention | –VA-ECMO alone per standard clinical protocol. |
| Experimental | Experimental | Device: Impella-CP LV VentVA-ECMO with early institution of Impella CP LV venting |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Cardiogenic shock: Including refractory to conventional therapy, including systolic blood pressure < 90mm Hg, Cardiac Index < 1.8 or a cardiac index < 2.0 on moderate to high doses of inotropes and vasopressors for greater than 30 mins, or systemic signs of tissue hypoxia.
- Post-acute myocardial infarction cardiogenic shock: excluding mechanical complications requiring surgical intervention after extracorpeal membrane oxygenator (ECMO) such as post-ischaemic ventricular septal defect (VSD).
- Drug overdose-induced cardiogenic shock.
- Early graft failure: post orthotropic heart transplantation cardiogenic shock, excluding immediate intra-operative failure.
- Acute on chronic cardiomyopathy with progressive shock and decompensation unresponsive to medical therapies.
Key exclusion criteria (21 listed)
- Recent Significant Pulmonary Embolus
- Moderate to severe aortic valve insufficiency (AI)
- Ongoing significant sepsis
- Severe pulmonary hypertension \& shock
- Hypothermia
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Impella-CP LV VentPatients randomised to the experimental arm will have an Impella-CP implanted in addition to VA-ECMO within a maximum of 10 hours of institution of VA-ECMO | Device | Experimental |
Primary outcome
Recovery From Cardiogenic Shock.
Time frame: At forty five days.
The number of subjects treated with this standardized ECMO protocol with either (i) no additional therapy or (ii) Impella CP for LV mechanical unloading who experience myocardial recovery defined as: survival free from mechanical circulatory support, heart transplantation or inotropic support.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Nov 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41668891Moussa MD, Roux J, Jungling M, Ramdane N, Loobuyck V, Brassart B, Rousse N, Dupre C, Mugnier A, Khalipha A, Bardeesi ASA, Lukowiak O, Lefebvre L, Juthier F, Robin E, Labreuche J, Thellier L, Vincentelli A. Impella Versus Selective Biatrial Canulation for Left Ventricular Unloading During Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation. Cardiovasc Ther. 2026 Feb 8;2026:3669575. doi: 10.1155/cdr/3669575. eCollection 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Deidentiifed data will be used within the research team
Related trials for Cardiogenic Shock
RecruitingObservational study
Evaluation of Acid-base Disorders and Ventilation Settings in Cardiogenic Shock and Post-cardiac Arrest Patients: Comparison With VentilO Algorithm
Cardiac Arrest (CA), Cardiogenic Shock
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Hemodynamic Evaluation of Left Atrial Pressure in Relationship to Pulmonary Capillary Wedge Pressure in Cardio Thoracic Patients
Cardiogenic Shock, Pulmonary Edema Cardiac Cause
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Capital Offload-Shock
Hypervolemia, Cardiogenic Shock
Recruiting
CRP Apheresis in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock
Cardiogenic Shock, Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI)
RecruitingObservational study
Cardiogenic Shock Working Group Registry
Cardiogenic Shock
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Christian Bermudez, MD principal investigator
University of Pennsylvania
Michael Ibrahim, MD PhD principal investigator
University of Pennsylvania
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Impella-CP LV Vent in people with Cardiogenic Shock, run by University of Pennsylvania at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 21 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Nov 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 19 Nov 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Recovery From Cardiogenic Shock. (time frame: At forty five days.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03431467, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Nov 2025.