AzTrials
AzTrials

Cardiogenic ShockREVERSENCT03431467

Impella CP With VA ECMO for Cardiogenic Shock

A study testing Impella-CP LV Vent in people with Cardiogenic Shock, run by University of Pennsylvania at 1 site in United States.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Veno-arterial extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is indicated as a haemodynamic rescue strategy in decompensated acute or chronic heart failure presenting as cardiogenic shock. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
Conditions the study is for
Cardiogenic Shock
What is being tested?
Impella-CP LV Vent
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
17 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
19 Mar 2018to 1 Sep 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Cardiogenic shock: Including refractory to conventional therapy, including systolic blood pressure < 90mm Hg, Cardiac Index < 1.8 or a cardiac index < 2.0 on moderate to high doses of inotropes and vasopressors for greater than 30 mins, or systemic signs of tissue hypoxia.
  • Post-acute myocardial infarction cardiogenic shock: excluding mechanical complications requiring surgical intervention after extracorpeal membrane oxygenator (ECMO) such as post-ischaemic ventricular septal defect (VSD).
  • Drug overdose-induced cardiogenic shock.
  • Early graft failure: post orthotropic heart transplantation cardiogenic shock, excluding immediate intra-operative failure.
  • Acute on chronic cardiomyopathy with progressive shock and decompensation unresponsive to medical therapies.

Who cannot join

  • Recent Significant Pulmonary Embolus
  • Moderate to severe aortic valve insufficiency (AI)
  • Ongoing significant sepsis
  • Severe pulmonary hypertension \& shock
  • Hypothermia
  • Post-cardiotomy cardiogenic shock
Show all 21Show fewer
  • Continuous cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) >20-30 minutes, except if neurological status is satisfactory
  • Transfer from outside hospital on VA ECMO or with history of CPR
  • Listed for cardiopulmonary transplantation or being evaluated for cardiopulmonary transplantation or permanent mechanical circulatory support
  • Known or suspected chronic heart failure with echocardiogram documenting left ventricular diastolic diameter >6.5cm
  • Known or suspected chronic heart failure with echocardiogram documenting left ventricular ejection fraction < 25%
  • Mechanical aortic valve replacement
  • Presence of left ventricular thrombus
  • Pre-existing Impella 2.5, CP, 3.5 or 5.0
  • Cardiogenic shock due to primary respiratory failure
  • Mechanical complications requiring surgical intervention after ECMO such as post-ischaemic VSD.
  • Severe liver failure
  • Active malignancy
  • Acute aortic dissection
  • Intracranial hemorrhage
  • Neurological injury including recent cerebrovascular accident or suspected severe neurologic injury

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Hospital of The University of Pennsylvania

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Prospective Randomised Trial of Early LV Venting Using Impella CP for Recovery in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Managed With VA ECMO

Veno-arterial extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is indicated as a haemodynamic rescue strategy in decompensated acute or chronic heart failure presenting as cardiogenic shock. It has been used across aeitologies including post-myocardial infarction, dilated cardiomyopathy, acute myocarditis and in post-cardiotomy shock. VA ECMO has a number of effects on the circulation including improved end-organ perfusion and possibly improved coronary perfusion, and is a bridge to further therapies including permanent advanced mechanical circulatory support, cardiac transplantation and to cardiac recovery.

Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) provide long-term mechanical circulatory support and also profoundly mechanically unload the left ventricle. Multiple clinical studies have documented cardiac recovery using LVAD therapy, with a rate between 10-60% in selected populations. A large body of basic science has documented the pivotal role of mechanical load in determining ventricular contractile performance across species. Therefore both clinical data and basic laboratory studies support the notion that profound ventricular unloading may result in improved cardiac performance through a variety of mechanisms ranging from triggered de novo cardiomyocyte proliferation, subcellular calcium handling reverse remodeling, changes to the extracellular matrix of the heart, reverse remodeling of the neurohormal milleu, amongst many others.

Read more

One of the major deficiencies of peripheral VA-ECMO is its lack of left ventricular unloading, with associated pulmonary congestion, which can derail clinical improvement and hamper cardiac recovery. Indeed, percutaneous VA-ECMO increases LV afterload due to the retrograde blood flow, and because of the lack of venting, there may be progressive LV distension. These conditions can result in a congested, pressure-overloaded ventricle, even in the absence of echocardiographic ventricular distension. This may be ameliorated with the addition of ventricular mechanical unloading using percutaneous therapies including the percutaneous left ventricular device, Impella CP.

On the platform of VA-ECMO, the addition of an Impella device to reduce ventricular loading results in improved survival and recovery of ventricular performance in the setting of cardiogenic shock. In a number of small studies, the use of additional means to unload the ventricle, principally Impella, results in cardiac recovery and less ventricular distension. In chronic heart failure, direct ventricular unloading is critical to cardiac recovery.

The objective of this randomized study is to determine whether the addition of early direct ventricular unloading using Impella CP leads to higher rates of cardiac recovery, defined as survival free from mechanical circulatory support, heart transplantation or inotropic support at thirty days. This study will also examine the clinical, biochemical, echocardiographic and radiologic effects of VA ECMO with and without the addition of Impella CP to directly vent the left ventricle to address adjunct important questions such as the effects on pulmonary congestion.

Being tested
Impella-CP LV Vent
Keywords
ECMO, Heart Failure, RCT, Mechanical unloading
Medical subject headings
Shock, Cardiogenic, Heart Failure

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Impella-CP LV VentDevice

    Patients randomised to the experimental arm will have an Impella-CP implanted in addition to VA-ECMO within a maximum of 10 hours of institution of VA-ECMO

Study groups in NCT03431467
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ControlNo interventionVA-ECMO alone per standard clinical protocol.
ExperimentalExperimentalVA-ECMO with early institution of Impella CP LV venting
Receives: Device: Impella-CP LV Vent

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Recovery From Cardiogenic Shock.

    The number of subjects treated with this standardized ECMO protocol with either (i) no additional therapy or (ii) Impella CP for LV mechanical unloading who experience myocardial recovery defined as: survival free from mechanical circulatory support, heart transplantation or inotropic support.

    Measured: At forty five days.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Feb 2018
  2. Study start19 Mar 2018
  3. Primary completion1 Sep 2023
  4. Study completion1 Sep 2023

Why it stopped: lack of recruitment

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Randomised controlled trial at three U Penn Sites
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
17 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03431467
Sponsor's protocol ID
828198
Acronym
REVERSE
Status last verified
Nov 2025
First submitted
21 Jan 2018
Last updated
19 Nov 2025
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No: Deidentiifed data will be used within the research team

Publications

  • Moussa MD, Roux J, Jungling M, Ramdane N, Loobuyck V, Brassart B, Rousse N, Dupre C, Mugnier A, Khalipha A, Bardeesi ASA, Lukowiak O, Lefebvre L, Juthier F, Robin E, Labreuche J, Thellier L, Vincentelli A. Impella Versus Selective Biatrial Canulation for Left Ventricular Unloading During Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation. Cardiovasc Ther. 2026 Feb 8;2026:3669575. doi: 10.1155/cdr/3669575. eCollection 2026.

    PubMed 41668891

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Impella-CP LV Vent in people with Cardiogenic Shock, run by University of Pennsylvania at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 21 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Nov 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 19 Nov 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Recovery From Cardiogenic Shock. (time frame: At forty five days.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03431467, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Nov 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in