AnxietyNCT04029961
Virtual Reality Education Program to Reduce Anxiety During Radiation Therapy
A study testing Video Education and VR-based Education in people with Anxiety and Stress, run by Medical College of Wisconsin at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of an immersive virtual reality (VR)-based education program with a form of patient education commonly provided by clinics (e.g., an educational video) at delivering education to breast cancer patients as they prepare for radiation therapy treatment. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Anxiety, Stress, Satisfaction, Patient
- What is being tested?
- Video Education and VR-based Education
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 28 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 12 Aug 2019to 14 Apr 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patient is 18 years of age or older
- Patient is female
- Patient has been diagnosed with breast cancer
- Patient will be receiving whole breast radiation therapy without supraclavicular nodal irradiation
- Patient is scheduled for an outpatient radiation oncology visit
- Patient has the ability to understand a written informed consent document, and the willingness to sign it
- Patient has the ability to complete a series of self-reported questionnaires
Who cannot join
- Non-English-speaking patients (as the VR education program includes English narration)
- Patients with visual defects that affect their ability to watch a movie
- Patients with auditory defects that affect their ability to listen with headphones
- Patients who have worked in the field of radiation oncology as they would have previously undergone treatment-related education
- Patients who have been treated previously with radiation oncology as they would have previously undergone treatment-related education
- Patients that have been diagnosed with epilepsy, conditions causing seizures, or have any previous history of seizures because a very minute number of head-mounted display (HMD) users have experienced a seizure as a result of using the device
Show all 9Show fewer
- Patients with a reported history of cognitive disability as their ability to understand educational content may be impaired
- Patients with a history of severe motion sickness because a side effect of using a HMD in a very small number of users is motion sickness symptoms
- Patients with a pacemaker, hearing aid(s), and/or defibrillator, while patients with other types of electronic medical devices / implants will be assessed for eligibility on a case-by-case basis because there could be potential interference with the HMD
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Froedtert & the Medical College of Wisconsin
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53226
About this study
Official title: Pilot Study for the Development and Implementation of a Virtual Reality-based Radiation Therapy Education and Anxiety Mitigation Program
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of an immersive virtual reality (VR)-based education program with a form of patient education commonly provided by clinics (e.g., an educational video) at delivering education to breast cancer patients as they prepare for radiation therapy treatment. Self-evaluation questionnaires completed by participants will be used to measure changes in information needs and anxiety, stress, preparedness and satisfaction levels pre/post education between the VR-based education and video education groups in this study. Expanded access to the current VR-based education program will depend on licensing status for associated assets by interested parties.
Read the detailed description
Breast cancer patients experience anxiety, potentially reaching levels that are considered clinically-relevant. Prior research in this area has described the information needs of breast cancer patients at different time points as they proceed through the radiotherapy treatment process. Of high importance seems to be addressing patients' information needs through sensory and procedural information as a mechanism of anxiety reduction.
The study team created an immersive VR-based education program that enables breast cancer patients to experience the procedure and emotions associated with radiation therapy prior to their actual treatment by offering controlled virtual exposure to the clinical environments involved in the treatment process. An educational video on the process of receiving radiation therapy is considered standard education at the majority of the clinical sites involved in this study.
Participants enrolled in this study will be randomly assigned to either the VR-based education group or the video education group. Participation in this project will provide insight into aspects of patient education that are most effective at reducing anxiety and stress levels and meeting patients' information needs when undergoing radiation therapy treatment.
- Conditions
- Anxiety, Stress, Satisfaction, Patient, Preparedness, Information Needs
- Being tested
- Video Education, VR-based Education
- Keywords
- Patient education, Virtual reality
- Medical subject headings
- Anxiety Disorders, Patient Satisfaction
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Video EducationOther
Prior to their CT simulation, participants will receive education on radiation therapy in the form of a video.
VR-based EducationOther
Prior to their CT simulation, participants will receive education on radiation therapy in the form of an immersive VR program delivered through a head-mounted display (HMD).
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Video Education | Active comparator | Participants will receive video education on radiation therapy. Receives: Other: Video Education |
| VR-based Education | Experimental | Participants will receive VR-based education on radiation therapy. Receives: Other: VR-based Education |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Intra- and Inter-arm Differences in Pre-post Intervention Changes in Anxiety Using the State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) for Adults Scores
The STAI was administered as a self-evaluation questionnaire at three time points. The STAI consists of two scales: one for measuring trait anxiety and one for measuring state anxiety. Both of the scales have ranges from 20 - 80, with higher scores representing higher anxiety.
Measured: Directly pre/post education (education appointment), directly following first radiation therapy (RT) treatment (first RT session)
Intra- and Inter-arm Differences in Pre-post Intervention Changes in Stress Using the Visual Analog Scale for Stress Scores
The Visual Analog Scale for Stress was administered as a self-evaluation questionnaire at three time points. Participants indicated where they fell in terms of stress level from 0 (no stress at all) to 100 (most stressed ever).
Measured: Directly pre/post education (education appointment), directly following first radiation therapy (RT) treatment (first RT session)
Intra- and Inter-arm Differences in Pre-post Intervention Changes in Preparedness Using the Visual Analog Scale for Preparedness Scores
The Visual Analog Scale for Preparedness was administered as a self-evaluation questionnaire at three time points. Participants indicated where they fell in terms of preparedness for their RT treatment from 0 (not prepared at all) to 100 (completely prepared).
Measured: Directly pre/post education (education appointment), directly following first radiation therapy (RT) treatment (first RT session)
Intra- and Inter-arm Differences in Pre-post Intervention Changes in Satisfaction Using the Visual Analog Scale for Satisfaction Scores
The Visual Analog Scale for Satisfaction was administered at three time points. Participants indicated where they fell in terms of satisfaction from their experience with the radiation oncology department from 0 (not satisfied at all) to 100 (completely satisfied).
Measured: Directly pre/post education (education appointment), directly following first radiation therapy (RT) treatment (first RT session)
Proportional Differences in Pre-post Intervention Changes in the "Met" Need Count Per Arm of Information Need Topics Related to Radiation Therapy Treatment Using the Information Needs Scale Scores
The Information Needs Scale was administered as a self-evaluation questionnaire at three time points. Participants were asked to indicate how important it was for them to have information on a set of items related to radiation therapy treatment from 1 (not important) to 9 (very important). Participants were also asked to indicate whether they felt their needed level of information for each item was met, partially met, or unmet at the time of questionnaire completion, which is reported here.
Measured: Directly pre/post education (education appointment), directly following first radiation therapy (RT) treatment (first RT session)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Jul 2019
- Study start12 Aug 2019
- Primary completion14 Apr 2020
- Study completion14 Apr 2020
Why it stopped: The study was suspended due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The study was then terminated to prevent inconsistencies in baseline anxiety for patients enrolled before vs after the COVID-19 pandemic.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for AnxietyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 28 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Medical College of Wisconsin
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Marquette University, Froedtert Hospital
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, John LaDisa, Medical College of Wisconsin
- Investigators
- John LaDisa, PhD, Principal investigator, Medical College of WisconsinMonica Shukla, MD, Principal investigator, Medical College of Wisconsin
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04029961
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PRO00032593
- Status last verified
- Apr 2021
- First submitted
- 15 Jul 2019
- Last updated
- 10 May 2021
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Halkett GK, Kristjanson LJ, Lobb E, Little J, Shaw T, Taylor M, Spry N. Information needs and preferences of women as they proceed through radiotherapy for breast cancer. Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Mar;86(3):396-404. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.05.010. Epub 2011 Jun 12.
PubMed 21664788Bekelis K, Calnan D, Simmons N, MacKenzie TA, Kakoulides G. Effect of an Immersive Preoperative Virtual Reality Experience on Patient Reported Outcomes: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Surg. 2017 Jun;265(6):1068-1073. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002094.
PubMed 27906757Halkett GK, Kristjanson LJ. Validity and reliability testing of two instruments to measure breast cancer patients' concerns and information needs relating to radiation therapy. Radiat Oncol. 2007 Nov 25;2:43. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-2-43.
PubMed 18036247Spielberger, C. State-Trait Anxiety Inventory for Adults - Manual, Instrument and Scoring Guide. 2015 Consulting Psychologists Press, Inc. Mind Garden, Inc.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 May 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Pilot Study for the Development and Implementation of a Virtual Reality-based Radiation Therapy Education and Anxiety Mitigation Program
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04029961
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PRO00032593
- Conditions
- Anxiety, Stress, Satisfaction, Patient, Preparedness, Information Needs
- Keywords
- Patient education, Virtual reality
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: The study was suspended due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The study was then terminated to prevent inconsistencies in baseline anxiety for patients enrolled before vs after the COVID-19 pandemic.
- Enrolment
- 28 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Medical College of WisconsinUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Marquette University, Froedtert Hospital
- Study start
- 12 Aug 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 14 Apr 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 14 Apr 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 23 Jul 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 10 May 2021
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of an immersive virtual reality (VR)-based education program with a form of patient education commonly provided by clinics (e.g., an educational video) at delivering education to breast cancer patients as they prepare for radiation therapy treatment. Self-evaluation questionnaires completed by participants will be used to measure changes in information needs and anxiety, stress, preparedness and satisfaction levels pre/post education between the VR-based education and video education groups in this study. Expanded access to the current VR-based education program will depend on licensing status for associated assets by interested parties.
Detailed description
Breast cancer patients experience anxiety, potentially reaching levels that are considered clinically-relevant. Prior research in this area has described the information needs of breast cancer patients at different time points as they proceed through the radiotherapy treatment process. Of high importance seems to be addressing patients' information needs through sensory and procedural information as a mechanism of anxiety reduction.
The study team created an immersive VR-based education program that enables breast cancer patients to experience the procedure and emotions associated with radiation therapy prior to their actual treatment by offering controlled virtual exposure to the clinical environments involved in the treatment process. An educational video on the process of receiving radiation therapy is considered standard education at the majority of the clinical sites involved in this study.
Participants enrolled in this study will be randomly assigned to either the VR-based education group or the video education group. Participation in this project will provide insight into aspects of patient education that are most effective at reducing anxiety and stress levels and meeting patients' information needs when undergoing radiation therapy treatment.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Video Education | Active comparator | Other: Video EducationParticipants will receive video education on radiation therapy. |
| VR-based Education | Experimental | Other: VR-based EducationParticipants will receive VR-based education on radiation therapy. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Patient is 18 years of age or older
- Patient is female
- Patient has been diagnosed with breast cancer
- Patient will be receiving whole breast radiation therapy without supraclavicular nodal irradiation
- Patient is scheduled for an outpatient radiation oncology visit
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Non-English-speaking patients (as the VR education program includes English narration)
- Patients with visual defects that affect their ability to watch a movie
- Patients with auditory defects that affect their ability to listen with headphones
- Patients who have worked in the field of radiation oncology as they would have previously undergone treatment-related education
- Patients who have been treated previously with radiation oncology as they would have previously undergone treatment-related education
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Video EducationPrior to their CT simulation, participants will receive education on radiation therapy in the form of a video. | Other | Video Education |
| VR-based EducationPrior to their CT simulation, participants will receive education on radiation therapy in the form of an immersive VR program delivered through a head-mounted display (HMD). | Other | VR-based Education |
Primary outcome
Intra- and Inter-arm Differences in Pre-post Intervention Changes in Anxiety Using the State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) for Adults Scores
Time frame: Directly pre/post education (education appointment), directly following first radiation therapy (RT) treatment (first RT session)
The STAI was administered as a self-evaluation questionnaire at three time points. The STAI consists of two scales: one for measuring trait anxiety and one for measuring state anxiety. Both of the scales have ranges from 20 - 80, with higher scores representing higher anxiety.
Intra- and Inter-arm Differences in Pre-post Intervention Changes in Stress Using the Visual Analog Scale for Stress Scores
Time frame: Directly pre/post education (education appointment), directly following first radiation therapy (RT) treatment (first RT session)
The Visual Analog Scale for Stress was administered as a self-evaluation questionnaire at three time points. Participants indicated where they fell in terms of stress level from 0 (no stress at all) to 100 (most stressed ever).
Intra- and Inter-arm Differences in Pre-post Intervention Changes in Preparedness Using the Visual Analog Scale for Preparedness Scores
Time frame: Directly pre/post education (education appointment), directly following first radiation therapy (RT) treatment (first RT session)
The Visual Analog Scale for Preparedness was administered as a self-evaluation questionnaire at three time points. Participants indicated where they fell in terms of preparedness for their RT treatment from 0 (not prepared at all) to 100 (completely prepared).
Intra- and Inter-arm Differences in Pre-post Intervention Changes in Satisfaction Using the Visual Analog Scale for Satisfaction Scores
Time frame: Directly pre/post education (education appointment), directly following first radiation therapy (RT) treatment (first RT session)
The Visual Analog Scale for Satisfaction was administered at three time points. Participants indicated where they fell in terms of satisfaction from their experience with the radiation oncology department from 0 (not satisfied at all) to 100 (completely satisfied).
Proportional Differences in Pre-post Intervention Changes in the "Met" Need Count Per Arm of Information Need Topics Related to Radiation Therapy Treatment Using the Information Needs Scale Scores
Time frame: Directly pre/post education (education appointment), directly following first radiation therapy (RT) treatment (first RT session)
The Information Needs Scale was administered as a self-evaluation questionnaire at three time points. Participants were asked to indicate how important it was for them to have information on a set of items related to radiation therapy treatment from 1 (not important) to 9 (very important). Participants were also asked to indicate whether they felt their needed level of information for each item was met, partially met, or unmet at the time of questionnaire completion, which is reported here.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 May 2021.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 21664788Halkett GK, Kristjanson LJ, Lobb E, Little J, Shaw T, Taylor M, Spry N. Information needs and preferences of women as they proceed through radiotherapy for breast cancer. Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Mar;86(3):396-404. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.05.010. Epub 2011 Jun 12.
- Background: PubMed 27906757Bekelis K, Calnan D, Simmons N, MacKenzie TA, Kakoulides G. Effect of an Immersive Preoperative Virtual Reality Experience on Patient Reported Outcomes: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Surg. 2017 Jun;265(6):1068-1073. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002094.
- Background: PubMed 18036247Halkett GK, Kristjanson LJ. Validity and reliability testing of two instruments to measure breast cancer patients' concerns and information needs relating to radiation therapy. Radiat Oncol. 2007 Nov 25;2:43. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-2-43.
- BackgroundSpielberger, C. State-Trait Anxiety Inventory for Adults - Manual, Instrument and Scoring Guide. 2015 Consulting Psychologists Press, Inc. Mind Garden, Inc.
- Patient Video by the American Society for Therapeutic Radiation Oncology (ASTRO)Link provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Anxiety
Not yet recruiting
Building Resilience Through Anxiety Virtual Education in PICU Survivors
Critical Illness Recovery, Mental Health
Not yet recruiting
Mandala Coloring in Late Pregnancy
Pregnancy, Anxiety
Recruiting
Modulating Escape Using Focused Ultrasound
Anxiety Disorders
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Ecological Momentary Assessment of State-Dependent Decision-Making and Metacognition Across a Psychopathology Continuum
Depression, Anxiety
Recruiting
Stress and Anxiety Effects on Valuation
Reward Value Level
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
John LaDisa, PhD principal investigator
Medical College of Wisconsin
Monica Shukla, MD principal investigator
Medical College of Wisconsin
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Video Education and VR-based Education in people with Anxiety and Stress, run by Medical College of Wisconsin at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 May 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 10 May 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Intra- and Inter-arm Differences in Pre-post Intervention Changes in Anxiety Using the State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) for Adults Scores (time frame: Directly pre/post education (education appointment), directly following first radiation therapy (RT) treatment (first RT session)). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04029961, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 May 2021.