AzTrials
AzTrials

SarcopeniaSARC-F-CHUBNCT04757454

Performance Indicators of the SARC-F Questionnaire in Acute Care

An observational study of Sarcopenia and Sensitivity, run by Brugmann University Hospital at 1 site in Belgium.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The study applies the Sluggishness, Assistance in walking, Rising from a chair, Climb stairs, Falls (SARC-F) questionnaire in older patients hospitalized in an acute care geriatric unit and aims to determine its performance indicators to screen for sarcopenia according to the revised European Consensus on definition… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 65 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Sarcopenia, Sensitivity, Old Age; Debility
What is being tested?
5-item SARC-F questionnaire
How many people
105 participants
Where
1 siteBelgium
Study dates
1 Sep 2019to 11 Nov 2020
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 65 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Older adult

Study population: Patients aged 65 and over hospitalized in an acute care geriatric unit due to acute medical conditions, where the SARC-F questionnaire and the EWGSOP2 was available

Who may be able to join

  • Patients aged 65 and over
  • Hospitalized in an acute care geriatric unit due to acute health issues or acute medical conditions
  • With SARC-F, hand-grip strength and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry administered during hospital admission

Who cannot join

  • SARC-F unavailable
  • Unwilling to collaborate in the sarcopenia assessment
  • Unwilling to sign the informed consent

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Belgium1 site
  • Brugmann university hospital

    Brussels, 1020

Other trials in Belgium

About this study

The study applies the Sluggishness, Assistance in walking, Rising from a chair, Climb stairs, Falls (SARC-F) questionnaire in older patients hospitalized in an acute care geriatric unit and aims to determine its performance indicators to screen for sarcopenia according to the revised European Consensus on definition and diagnosis (EWGSOP2) within this population

Read the detailed description

Sarcopenia is an age-related disease associated with health adverse outcomes, i.e. higher risk of mobility limitation, falls, fractures, mortality, and lower quality of life. The European Working Group on Sarcopenia has recently revisited one of the widely used most acknowledged definitions and launched the revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis (EWGSOP2) (4). Applying the EWGSOP2 is a three-tier process: first, screening by the Sluggishness, Assistance in walking, Rising from a chair, Climb stairs, Falls (SARC-F) questionnaire; second, diagnosis by low muscle strength, and low muscle mass; third, severity grading by low muscle function. The EWGSOP2 recommends the assessment of sarcopenia in every population, both in community-dwelling and acute care older patients. However, the evidence about the performance indicators of the SARC-F questionnaire to screen for sarcopenia in acute patients admitted to an acute care unit is really limited.

Being tested
5-item SARC-F questionnaire
Medical subject headings
Sarcopenia, Hypersensitivity, Frailty

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • 5-item SARC-F questionnaireDiagnostic test

    Administration of the 5-item SARC-F questionnaire in patients admitted to an acute care unit

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Sensitivity of the SARC-F questionnaire as screening method compared to the gold standard, which is the revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis

    Sensitivity, measured as a percentage (%)

    Measured: September 2019-November 2020

  2. Specificity of the SARC-F questionnaire as a screening method, compared to the gold standard which is the revised European Consensus on definition and diagnosis of sarcopenia (EWGSOP2)

    Specificity, measured as a percentage (%)

    Measured: September 2019-November 2020

  3. Overall concordance agreement between the SARC-F questionnaire as a screening method and the gold standard method, which is the EWGSOP2

    Cohen-kappa coefficient, measured as a percentage (%)

    Measured: September 2019-November 2020

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Health adverse outcomes based on the screening and diagnosis of sarcopenia as recommended by the EWGSOP2

    Mortality risk

    Measured: 1-year follow-up

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Feb 2021
  2. Study start1 Sep 2019
  3. Primary completion11 Nov 2020
  4. Study completion11 Nov 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case only
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
105 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04757454
Sponsor's protocol ID
CHUB SARC-F
Acronym
SARC-F-CHUB
Status last verified
Feb 2021
First submitted
8 Feb 2021
Last updated
17 Feb 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Sanchez-Rodriguez D, Marco E, Davalos-Yerovi V, Lopez-Escobar J, Messaggi-Sartor M, Barrera C, Ronquillo-Moreno N, Vazquez-Ibar O, Calle A, Inzitari M, Piotrowicz K, Duran X, Escalada F, Muniesa JM, Duarte E. Translation and Validation of the Spanish Version of the SARC-F Questionnaire to Assess Sarcopenia in Older People. J Nutr Health Aging. 2019;23(6):518-524. doi: 10.1007/s12603-019-1204-z.

    PubMed 31233072
  • Piotrowicz K, Gluszewska A, Czesak J, Fedyk-Lukasik M, Klimek E, Sanchez-Rodriguez D, Skalska A, Gryglewska B, Grodzicki T, Gasowski J. SARC-F as a case-finding tool for sarcopenia according to the EWGSOP2. National validation and comparison with other diagnostic standards. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2021 Jul;33(7):1821-1829. doi: 10.1007/s40520-020-01782-y. Epub 2021 Jan 28.

    PubMed 33506313
  • Sanchez-Rodriguez D, Marco E, Cruz-Jentoft AJ. Defining sarcopenia: some caveats and challenges. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2020 Mar;23(2):127-132. doi: 10.1097/MCO.0000000000000621.

    PubMed 31789867
  • Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Bahat G, Bauer J, Boirie Y, Bruyere O, Cederholm T, Cooper C, Landi F, Rolland Y, Sayer AA, Schneider SM, Sieber CC, Topinkova E, Vandewoude M, Visser M, Zamboni M; Writing Group for the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People 2 (EWGSOP2), and the Extended Group for EWGSOP2. Sarcopenia: revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age Ageing. 2019 Jan 1;48(1):16-31. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afy169.

    PubMed 30312372

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Sarcopenia and Sensitivity, run by Brugmann University Hospital at 1 site in Belgium.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Feb 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Sensitivity of the SARC-F questionnaire as screening method compared to the gold standard, which is the revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis (time frame: September 2019-November 2020). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04757454, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Feb 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in