Acute Heart FailureINDICATE-HFNCT04886128
Improving Diagnostic Accuracy for Acute Heart Failure
An observational study of Acute Heart Failure and Dyspnea, run by Vanderbilt University Medical Center at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Acute heart failure is a common reason for emergency department visits and hospitalization, but the diagnosis can be challenging because of non-specific symptoms and signs. The current diagnostic approach to acute heart failure has modest accuracy, leading to delayed diagnosis and treatment, which associate with worse… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Acute Heart Failure, Dyspnea, Dyspnea; Cardiac
- How many people
- 2,469 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 31 Aug 2021to 1 May 2026
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Adults (18 years or older) presenting with the chief complaint of dyspnea and in whom the ED physician is considering the diagnosis of acute HF, based on an order for measurement of NP levels (either BNP or NT-proBNP) or a chest x-ray will be included. Patients whose dyspnea is due to trauma, those who are on chronic hemodialysis, and patients whose primary presentation is consistent with acute coronary syndrome will be excluded.
Who may be able to join
- Willing to adhere to the study protocol
- Able to provide written consent
- English or Spanish speaking
- Adult, defined as 18 years or older
- Primary reason for presentation to the ED is dyspnea
- ED physician is considering a diagnosis of HF, defined by ordering a NP test and/or a chest x-ray
Who cannot join
- History of end-stage renal disease for which hemodialysis is needed
- Dyspnea due to primary presentation of an acute coronary syndrome or trauma
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Nashville, Tennessee, 37232
About this study
Acute heart failure is a common reason for emergency department visits and hospitalization, but the diagnosis can be challenging because of non-specific symptoms and signs. The current diagnostic approach to acute heart failure has modest accuracy, leading to delayed diagnosis and treatment, which associate with worse prognosis. Prior work suggests diagnostic accuracy can be improved with the addition of multiple circulating biomarkers discovered through proteomics, and this study will derive and validate a multi-marker model to improve diagnostic accuracy for acute heart failure in the emergency department.
Read the detailed description
Acute heart failure (HF) is highly morbid, lethal, and costly. It is a difficult diagnosis to make given its symptoms and signs overlap with other cardiac and non-cardiac conditions. In the emergency department (ED), misdiagnosis of acute HF is common and associated with adverse outcomes. Biomarker testing can facilitate accurate diagnosis; however, natriuretic peptides (NP) are the only guideline recommend biomarker of HF for diagnostic testing, and are better for ruling-out, rather than ruling-in, acute HF. Even with NP testing, in contemporary clinical practice misdiagnosis of acute HF still occurs in 10 to 45% of patients presenting to the ED with dyspnea. Clinical prediction models including multiple biomarkers hold promise for improving diagnostic accuracy. The few prior studies investigating a multiple biomarker approach for diagnosing acute HF were limited by constraint to highly correlated markers from known biologic pathways, relatively small sample sizes, lack of inclusion of all a priori selected biomarkers into a single model, and absence of validation cohorts. The current study is designed to address these limitations. Recent advances in "omics" enable novel biomarker discovery on a larger scale and investigations less "biased" by existing knowledge. The overarching hypothesis of this study is that a multi-marker model incorporating novel proteins discovered with plasma proteomics improves diagnostic accuracy for acute HF. In a preliminary proof of concept study plasma proteomics was utilized to discover a multi-marker panel of 21 biomarkers which improved diagnostic accuracy for acute HF beyond current clinical practice using clinical data and NP levels. These promising preliminary data motivate broader discovery in a larger sample size with subsequent derivation and validation of a multi-marker model for diagnosing acute HF in independent samples of adequate size. The specific aims of this study are to: 1) discover a multi-marker panel of 21 biomarkers to improve diagnostic accuracy for acute HF, 2) derive a model for diagnosing acute HF incorporating the 21-biomarker panel, and 3) test performance of the multi-marker model in a prospective validation cohort. In aim 1, existing plasma samples from ~900 patients will be used to assay 925 proteins to discover a smaller set of novel biomarkers most strongly associated with an adjudicated acute HF diagnosis. In aim 2, an existing prospective observational cohort, EMROC-AHF, will be utilized to derive the multi-marker model in ~900 patients who presented to the ED with acute dyspnea. In aim 3, from four EDs in Detroit, MI and Nashville, TN a new sample will prospectively recruit ~1,000 patients presenting with acute dyspnea and adjudicate the presence of acute HF by cardiologist panel review. Given the burden of HF, the frequency of inaccurate diagnosis and its adverse consequences, this study will address a significant unmet need by improving diagnostic accuracy for acute HF.
- Conditions
- Acute Heart Failure, Dyspnea, Dyspnea; Cardiac
- Keywords
- heart failure, acute heart failure
- Medical subject headings
- Dyspnea, Heart Failure
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Aim 1/Outcome 1 | Secondary analysis of frozen plasma samples from the existing STRATIFY cohort of patients with and without acute heart failure presenting to emergency departments. n= ~900 | |
| Aim2/Outcome 2 | Secondary analysis of frozen plasma samples from the existing EMROC cohort of patients with and without acute heart failure presenting to emergency departments. n= ~900 | |
| Aim 3/Outcome 3 | Prospective recruitment of approximately 1000 patients with and w/o acute heart failure presenting to emergency departments. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Biomarker Discovery
Define the multi-marker panel of 21 proteins that may improve diagnostic accuracy for acute heart failure
Measured: Enrollment
Model derivation for diagnosing acute HF
derive a model for diagnosing acute HF incorporating the 21-biomarker panel from outcome 1
Measured: Enrollment
Model validation for diagnosing acute HF
test performance of the multi-marker model (from outcome 2) in a prospective validation cohort
Measured: Enrollment
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 May 2021
- Study start31 Aug 2021
- Primary completion1 May 2026
- Study completion1 May 2026
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Acute Heart FailureStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Vanderbilt University Medical CenterThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Enrolment
- 2,469 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Wayne State University
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Deepak Gupta, Vanderbilt University Medical Center
- Investigators
- Deepak Gupta, MD, MSCI, Principal investigator, Vanderbilt University Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04886128
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 210941
- Acronym
- INDICATE-HF
- Status last verified
- Jul 2026
- First submitted
- 4 May 2021
- Last updated
- 6 Jul 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Jul 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Improving Diagnostic Accuracy for Acute Heart Failure
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04886128
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- INDICATE-HF / 210941
- Conditions
- Acute Heart Failure, Dyspnea, Dyspnea; Cardiac
- Keywords
- heart failure, acute heart failure
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 2,469 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Vanderbilt University Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Wayne State University
- Study start
- 31 Aug 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 May 2026 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 May 2026 (actual)
- First posted
- 13 May 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Acute heart failure is a common reason for emergency department visits and hospitalization, but the diagnosis can be challenging because of non-specific symptoms and signs. The current diagnostic approach to acute heart failure has modest accuracy, leading to delayed diagnosis and treatment, which associate with worse prognosis. Prior work suggests diagnostic accuracy can be improved with the addition of multiple circulating biomarkers discovered through proteomics, and this study will derive and validate a multi-marker model to improve diagnostic accuracy for acute heart failure in the emergency department.
Detailed description
Acute heart failure (HF) is highly morbid, lethal, and costly. It is a difficult diagnosis to make given its symptoms and signs overlap with other cardiac and non-cardiac conditions. In the emergency department (ED), misdiagnosis of acute HF is common and associated with adverse outcomes. Biomarker testing can facilitate accurate diagnosis; however, natriuretic peptides (NP) are the only guideline recommend biomarker of HF for diagnostic testing, and are better for ruling-out, rather than ruling-in, acute HF. Even with NP testing, in contemporary clinical practice misdiagnosis of acute HF still occurs in 10 to 45% of patients presenting to the ED with dyspnea. Clinical prediction models including multiple biomarkers hold promise for improving diagnostic accuracy. The few prior studies investigating a multiple biomarker approach for diagnosing acute HF were limited by constraint to highly correlated markers from known biologic pathways, relatively small sample sizes, lack of inclusion of all a priori selected biomarkers into a single model, and absence of validation cohorts. The current study is designed to address these limitations. Recent advances in "omics" enable novel biomarker discovery on a larger scale and investigations less "biased" by existing knowledge. The overarching hypothesis of this study is that a multi-marker model incorporating novel proteins discovered with plasma proteomics improves diagnostic accuracy for acute HF. In a preliminary proof of concept study plasma proteomics was utilized to discover a multi-marker panel of 21 biomarkers which improved diagnostic accuracy for acute HF beyond current clinical practice using clinical data and NP levels. These promising preliminary data motivate broader discovery in a larger sample size with subsequent derivation and validation of a multi-marker model for diagnosing acute HF in independent samples of adequate size. The specific aims of this study are to: 1) discover a multi-marker panel of 21 biomarkers to improve diagnostic accuracy for acute HF, 2) derive a model for diagnosing acute HF incorporating the 21-biomarker panel, and 3) test performance of the multi-marker model in a prospective validation cohort. In aim 1, existing plasma samples from ~900 patients will be used to assay 925 proteins to discover a smaller set of novel biomarkers most strongly associated with an adjudicated acute HF diagnosis. In aim 2, an existing prospective observational cohort, EMROC-AHF, will be utilized to derive the multi-marker model in ~900 patients who presented to the ED with acute dyspnea. In aim 3, from four EDs in Detroit, MI and Nashville, TN a new sample will prospectively recruit ~1,000 patients presenting with acute dyspnea and adjudicate the presence of acute HF by cardiologist panel review. Given the burden of HF, the frequency of inaccurate diagnosis and its adverse consequences, this study will address a significant unmet need by improving diagnostic accuracy for acute HF.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Aim 1/Outcome 1 | – | –Secondary analysis of frozen plasma samples from the existing STRATIFY cohort of patients with and without acute heart failure presenting to emergency departments. n= ~900 |
| Aim2/Outcome 2 | – | –Secondary analysis of frozen plasma samples from the existing EMROC cohort of patients with and without acute heart failure presenting to emergency departments. n= ~900 |
| Aim 3/Outcome 3 | – | –Prospective recruitment of approximately 1000 patients with and w/o acute heart failure presenting to emergency departments. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Adults (18 years or older) presenting with the chief complaint of dyspnea and in whom the ED physician is considering the diagnosis of acute HF, based on an order for measurement of NP levels (either BNP or NT-proBNP) or a chest x-ray will be included. Patients whose dyspnea is due to trauma, those who are on chronic hemodialysis, and patients whose primary presentation is consistent with acute coronary syndrome will be excluded.
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Willing to adhere to the study protocol
- Able to provide written consent
- English or Spanish speaking
- Adult, defined as 18 years or older
- Primary reason for presentation to the ED is dyspnea
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- History of end-stage renal disease for which hemodialysis is needed
- Dyspnea due to primary presentation of an acute coronary syndrome or trauma
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Biomarker Discovery
Time frame: Enrollment
Define the multi-marker panel of 21 proteins that may improve diagnostic accuracy for acute heart failure
Model derivation for diagnosing acute HF
Time frame: Enrollment
derive a model for diagnosing acute HF incorporating the 21-biomarker panel from outcome 1
Model validation for diagnosing acute HF
Time frame: Enrollment
test performance of the multi-marker model (from outcome 2) in a prospective validation cohort
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Jul 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Acute Heart Failure
Recruiting
Evaluation of Fibroscan® Performance in Diagnosing Acute Heart Failure in Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department
Acute Heart Failure (AHF)
RecruitingObservational study
Cardiogenic Shock Working Group Registry
Cardiogenic Shock
RecruitingPhase 3
Optimal Diuretic Therapies for Acute Heart Failure With Volume Overload
Acute Heart Failure
RecruitingObservational study
Changes in Skeletal Muscle Thickness in Patients With Acute Heart Failure
Heart Failure, Muscle Atrophy
RecruitingPhase 4
DECONGEST-AHF: Vasodilatation or Loop Diuretics in Acute Heart Failure
Pulmonary Edema, Congestive Heart Failure
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Deepak Gupta, MD, MSCI principal investigator
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Acute Heart Failure and Dyspnea, run by Vanderbilt University Medical Center at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Jul 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Biomarker Discovery (time frame: Enrollment). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Jul 2026.