Migraine DisordersNCT05369910
How Can we Treat Photophobia in Migraine
A study testing Light exposure (Flash) and Light deprivation (Dark) in people with Migraine Disorders and Photophobia, run by Medical University of Vienna.
Trial summary
Photophobia, the aberrantly increased sensitivity to light, is a common symptom in migraine patients and light discomfort is frequently found as a trigger for migraine attacks. In behavioral studies, planned exposure to light was found to reduce headache in migraineurs with photophobia, potentially by increasing… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 45 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Migraine Disorders, Photophobia
- What is being tested?
- Light exposure (Flash) and Light deprivation (Dark)
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 21 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 Apr 2015to 30 Sep 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 45 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients:
- Migraine without aura according to the criteria of the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD-3 beta)
- 1-4 days with migraine per month in the preceding last 3 months
- A score between 2 and 6 on a numeric rating scale for the intensity of interictal photophobia (range from 0 to 10 (= max. intensity))
- A score >4 for ictal photophobia
- Controls
- No personal or family history of migraine
- A score <2 for photophobia
Who cannot join
- Current or previous circadian rhythm disorders
- Current or previous major depression
- Current or previous anxiety disorders
- Current or previous medication overuse
- Besides migraine in the patient group, participants should not suffer from any other recurrent headache apart from infrequent tension-type headaches
About this study
Photophobia, the aberrantly increased sensitivity to light, is a common symptom in migraine patients and light discomfort is frequently found as a trigger for migraine attacks. In behavioral studies, planned exposure to light was found to reduce headache in migraineurs with photophobia, potentially by increasing habituation to this migraine trigger. Here, neurophysiological mechanisms of light exposure versus light deprivation therapy in migraine patients are investigated using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI).
Migraine patients and healthy controls receive light exposure therapy (Flash) and light deprivation therapy (Dark) for one hour daily on 7 consecutive days, in a crossover design with a wash-out period of three months. Study participants keep a diary including items on interictal and ictal photophobia, headache frequency and severity 7 days before, during, and 7 days after the interventions. One week before and one day after both interventions, fMRI using flickering light in a block design is applied. Functional activation is analyzed at whole-brain level and habituation of the visual cortex (V1) is modeled with the initial amplitude estimate and the corrected habituation slope.
- Conditions
- Migraine Disorders, Photophobia
- Being tested
- Light exposure (Flash), Light deprivation (Dark)
- Keywords
- migraine, photophobia, habituation, headache, functional magnetic resonance imaging
- Medical subject headings
- Migraine Disorders, Photophobia, Substance-Related Disorders, Headache
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Light exposure (Flash)Behavioural
Light exposure (Flash) is administered for one hour on 7 consecutive days. During the light exposure, participants are seated 120 cm in front of a white curtain that is illuminated by an LED light source (Dawe stroboscope type 1214B, 5 Hz).
Light deprivation (Dark)Behavioural
Light deprivation (Dark) is administered for one hour on 7 consecutive days. During the Dark intervention, participants are seated in a room in complete darkness.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Flash first | Experimental | Light exposure (Flash) first, light deprivation (Dark) second:
Both interventions (Flash and Dark) are administered for one hour on 7 consecutive days. During the light exposure, participants are seated 120 cm in front of a white curtain that is illuminated by an LED light source. During the light deprivation, participants are seated in the same room used for light exposure, but in complete darkness. Receives: Behavioral: Light exposure (Flash); Behavioral: Light deprivation (Dark) |
| Dark first | Experimental | Light deprivation (Dark) first, Light exposure (Flash) second:
Both interventions (Flash and Dark) are administered for one hour on 7 consecutive days. During the light exposure, participants are seated 120 cm in front of a white curtain that is illuminated by an LED light source. During the light deprivation, participants are seated in the same room used for light exposure, but in complete darkness. Receives: Behavioral: Light exposure (Flash); Behavioral: Light deprivation (Dark) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change from baseline interictal photophobia during and after the interventions
Subjective sensitivity to light between migraine attacks is assessed using a numeric rating scale with the range from 0 (= no photophobia) to 10 (= max. photophobia). The numeric rating scale is daily completed by the participants over the study course using a structured diary. Daily reports are averaged for the duration of the baseline phase (7 days before the first intervention starts), for the duration of the interventions (Flash and Dark, 7 days each), and for 7 days after the interventions (Post Flash, Post Dark).
Measured: Change in interictal photophobia during the interventions (Flash and Dark, average over 7 days) and after the interventions (Post Flash, Post Dark, average over 7 days) relative to the baseline (average over 7 days before the first intervention starts).
Secondary outcomes (3)
Change from baseline headache frequency during and after the interventions
In the structured diary, the participants report if a headache is present (1) or absent (0). Daily reports are averaged for the duration of the baseline phase (7 days before the first intervention starts), for the duration of the interventions (Flash and Dark, 7 days each), and for 7 days after the interventions (Post Flash, Post Dark).
Measured: Change in headache frequency during the interventions (Flash and Dark, average over 7 days) and after the interventions (Post Flash, Post Dark, average over 7 days) relative to the baseline (average over 7 days before the first intervention starts).
Change from baseline headache severity during and after the interventions
If a headache is present that day, questions regarding headache severity (mild (1), moderate (2), severe (3)) are completed in the structured diary. Daily reports are averaged for the duration of the baseline phase (7 days before the first intervention starts), for the duration of the interventions (Flash and Dark, 7 days each), and for 7 days after the interventions (Post Flash, Post Dark).
Measured: Change in headache severity during the interventions (Flash and Dark, average over 7 days) and after the interventions (Post Flash, Post Dark, average over 7 days) relative to the baseline (average over 7 days before the first intervention starts).
Change from baseline ictal photophobia during and after the interventions
If a headache is present that day, photophobia during the headache is assessed on a numeric rating scale with the range from 0 (= no photophobia) to 10 (= max. photophobia). Daily reports are averaged for the duration of the baseline phase (7 days before the first intervention starts), for the duration of the interventions (Flash and Dark, 7 days each), and for 7 days after the interventions (Post Flash, Post Dark).
Measured: Change in ictal photophobia during the interventions (Flash and Dark, average over 7 days) and after the interventions (Post Flash, Post Dark, average over 7 days) relative to the baseline (average over 7 days before the first intervention starts).
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 May 2022
- Study start1 Apr 2015
- Primary completion30 Sep 2019
- Study completion30 Sep 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Migraine DisordersStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Medical University of ViennaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Model description
- Participants receive light exposure therapy (Flash) and light deprivation therapy (Dark) for one hour daily on 7 consecutive days, in a crossover design with a wash-out period of 3 months. The sequence of the interventions is randomly allocated.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 21 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Medical University of Vienna
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Austrian Science Fund (FWF)
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Dr. Eva Matt, Medical University of Vienna
- Investigators
- Roland Beisteiner, MD, Principal investigator, Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05369910
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- KLI 455
- Status last verified
- May 2022
- First submitted
- 2 May 2022
- Last updated
- 11 May 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Matt E, Aslan T, Amini A, Saricicek K, Seidel S, Martin P, Wober C, Beisteiner R. Avoid or seek light - a randomized crossover fMRI study investigating opposing treatment strategies for photophobia in migraine. J Headache Pain. 2022 Aug 11;23(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s10194-022-01466-0.
PubMed 35948966
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 May 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- How Can we Treat Photophobia in Migraine
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05369910
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- KLI 455
- Conditions
- Migraine Disorders, Photophobia
- Keywords
- migraine, photophobia, habituation, headache, functional magnetic resonance imaging
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 21 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Medical University of ViennaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Austrian Science Fund (FWF)
- Study start
- 1 Apr 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Sep 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Sep 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 11 May 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Photophobia, the aberrantly increased sensitivity to light, is a common symptom in migraine patients and light discomfort is frequently found as a trigger for migraine attacks. In behavioral studies, planned exposure to light was found to reduce headache in migraineurs with photophobia, potentially by increasing habituation to this migraine trigger. Here, neurophysiological mechanisms of light exposure versus light deprivation therapy in migraine patients are investigated using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI).
Migraine patients and healthy controls receive light exposure therapy (Flash) and light deprivation therapy (Dark) for one hour daily on 7 consecutive days, in a crossover design with a wash-out period of three months. Study participants keep a diary including items on interictal and ictal photophobia, headache frequency and severity 7 days before, during, and 7 days after the interventions. One week before and one day after both interventions, fMRI using flickering light in a block design is applied. Functional activation is analyzed at whole-brain level and habituation of the visual cortex (V1) is modeled with the initial amplitude estimate and the corrected habituation slope.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Participants receive light exposure therapy (Flash) and light deprivation therapy (Dark) for one hour daily on 7 consecutive days, in a crossover design with a wash-out period of 3 months. The sequence of the interventions is randomly allocated.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Flash first | Experimental | Behavioral: Light exposure (Flash), Behavioral: Light deprivation (Dark)Light exposure (Flash) first, light deprivation (Dark) second: Both interventions (Flash and Dark) are administered for one hour on 7 consecutive days. During the light exposure, participants are seated 120 cm in front of a white curtain that is illuminated by an LED light source. During the light deprivation, participants are seated in the same room used for light exposure, but in complete darkness. |
| Dark first | Experimental | Behavioral: Light exposure (Flash), Behavioral: Light deprivation (Dark)Light deprivation (Dark) first, Light exposure (Flash) second: Both interventions (Flash and Dark) are administered for one hour on 7 consecutive days. During the light exposure, participants are seated 120 cm in front of a white curtain that is illuminated by an LED light source. During the light deprivation, participants are seated in the same room used for light exposure, but in complete darkness. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 45 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Migraine without aura according to the criteria of the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD-3 beta)
- 1-4 days with migraine per month in the preceding last 3 months
- A score between 2 and 6 on a numeric rating scale for the intensity of interictal photophobia (range from 0 to 10 (= max. intensity))
- A score >4 for ictal photophobia
- Controls
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Current or previous circadian rhythm disorders
- Current or previous major depression
- Current or previous anxiety disorders
- Current or previous medication overuse
- Besides migraine in the patient group, participants should not suffer from any other recurrent headache apart from infrequent tension-type headaches
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Light exposure (Flash)Light exposure (Flash) is administered for one hour on 7 consecutive days. During the light exposure, participants are seated 120 cm in front of a white curtain that is illuminated by an LED light source (Dawe stroboscope type 1214B, 5 Hz). | Behavioural | Dark first, Flash first |
| Light deprivation (Dark)Light deprivation (Dark) is administered for one hour on 7 consecutive days. During the Dark intervention, participants are seated in a room in complete darkness. | Behavioural | Dark first, Flash first |
Primary outcome
Change from baseline interictal photophobia during and after the interventions
Time frame: Change in interictal photophobia during the interventions (Flash and Dark, average over 7 days) and after the interventions (Post Flash, Post Dark, average over 7 days) relative to the baseline (average over 7 days before the first intervention starts).
Subjective sensitivity to light between migraine attacks is assessed using a numeric rating scale with the range from 0 (= no photophobia) to 10 (= max. photophobia). The numeric rating scale is daily completed by the participants over the study course using a structured diary. Daily reports are averaged for the duration of the baseline phase (7 days before the first intervention starts), for the duration of the interventions (Flash and Dark, 7 days each), and for 7 days after the interventions (Post Flash, Post Dark).
3 secondary outcomes
Change from baseline headache frequency during and after the interventions
Time frame: Change in headache frequency during the interventions (Flash and Dark, average over 7 days) and after the interventions (Post Flash, Post Dark, average over 7 days) relative to the baseline (average over 7 days before the first intervention starts).
Change from baseline headache severity during and after the interventions
Time frame: Change in headache severity during the interventions (Flash and Dark, average over 7 days) and after the interventions (Post Flash, Post Dark, average over 7 days) relative to the baseline (average over 7 days before the first intervention starts).
Change from baseline ictal photophobia during and after the interventions
Time frame: Change in ictal photophobia during the interventions (Flash and Dark, average over 7 days) and after the interventions (Post Flash, Post Dark, average over 7 days) relative to the baseline (average over 7 days before the first intervention starts).
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 May 2022.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35948966Matt E, Aslan T, Amini A, Saricicek K, Seidel S, Martin P, Wober C, Beisteiner R. Avoid or seek light - a randomized crossover fMRI study investigating opposing treatment strategies for photophobia in migraine. J Headache Pain. 2022 Aug 11;23(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s10194-022-01466-0.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Migraine Disorders
RecruitingObservational study
Study of the Glymphatic System in Migraine
Migraine
Active, not recruiting
Clinical and Neurophysiological Effects of tDCS to Visual and Motor Cortex in Migraine
Migraine
Active, not recruiting
App-Based Migraine Treatment: The Health enSuite Study
Migraine, Migraine With Aura
Not yet recruiting
A Prospective Study of Rimegepant for Short-term Preventive Treatment of Night-shift-related Migraine in Healthcare Professionals
Migraine Disorders
Recruiting
Marine Lipids Ease Painful TMD
Temporomandibular Disorder (TMD)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Roland Beisteiner, MD principal investigator
Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Light exposure (Flash) and Light deprivation (Dark) in people with Migraine Disorders and Photophobia, run by Medical University of Vienna.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 May 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change from baseline interictal photophobia during and after the interventions (time frame: Change in interictal photophobia during the interventions (Flash and Dark, average over 7 days) and after the interventions (Post Flash, Post Dark, average over 7 days) relative to the baseline (average over 7 days before the first intervention starts).). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05369910, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 May 2022.