Esophageal AchalasiaNCT05602272
Respiratory and Hemodynamic Implications of Endoscopic Myotomy of the Esophagus and Stomach
An observational study of Esophageal Achalasia and Gastroparesis, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois at 1 site in Switzerland.
Trial summary
The goal of this observational study is to learn about hemodynamic and respiratory repercussions during general anesthesia in patients with achalasia or gastroparesis who underwent an endoscopic treatment such as a peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) or gastric (GPOEM). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 99 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Esophageal Achalasia, Gastroparesis
- What is being tested?
- General anesthesia for per-oral endoscopic myotomy
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSwitzerland
- Study dates
- 1 Nov 2022to 1 Nov 2025
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 99 years
- All sexes
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients with achalasia or gastroparesis who are summoned for POEM or GPOEM type endoscopy treatment at the Lausanne University Hospital.
Who may be able to join
- Completed and signed consent form (consent form attached)
- Age ≥ 18 years old
- Anesthetic risk classification according to ASA, from 1 to 3
- Patients summoned for POEM or GPOEM type endoscopy treatment
Who cannot join
- Inability to follow study procedures, eg. due to language problems, psychological disorders, dementia, etc. of the participant
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Switzerland1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
CHUV
Lausanne, Canton of Vaud, 1011
Madeleine Chollet-Rivier, Dr, madelein.chollet-rivier@chuv.ch
Aldo Cavuoto, +41795565766, aldo.cavuoto@chuv.ch
About this study
Official title: Respiratory and Hemodynamic Implications of Endoscopic Myotomy of the Esophagus and Stomach (POEM/GPOEM)
The goal of this observational study is to learn about hemodynamic and respiratory repercussions during general anesthesia in patients with achalasia or gastroparesis who underwent an endoscopic treatment such as a peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) or gastric (GPOEM).
The main questions it aims to answer are:
Read more
- Are there predictable elements reliable to this study-population for the occurrence of adverse events/complications?
- Is there a correlation between the value (percutaneous puncture) of the intra-abdominal pressure and the variations of the patient's respiratory and hemodynamic parameters in the event of a pneumoperitoneum complication?
Participants will be treated with the usual standard of care for this procedure and no additional or specific therapy will be planned for this study.
Read the detailed description
During the last ten years, the treatment of motor disorders of the esophagus and gastroparesis, by endoscopic approach, has become widespread. Because of its safety and effectiveness, this endoscopic technique has become the gold standard in esophageal and gastric motility disorders. This procedure consists of performing, under general anesthesia, a myotomy of the lower esophageal or pyloric sphincter, by performing a dissection under the mucous membrane beforehand. To properly expose the surgical site, the operator uses CO2, usually at a low flow rate, to reduce the risk of complications. However, subcutaneous emphysema (especially cervical), pneumoperitoneum, pneumothorax and pneumomediastinum occur in about 7.5-55% of cases, according to the literature. These adverse events frequently coincide with anesthetic difficulties. Indeed, the accumulation of CO2 outside the digestive lumen can disrupt mechanical ventilation (restrictive effect) by increasing intra-abdominal or intra-thoracic pressure. Consequently, the inspiratory pressure increases, the tidal volume decreases and the patient can desaturate. Therefore, stopping the endoscopic procedure is necessary and percutaneous CO2 exsufflation is indicated.
The recent evolution of endoscopic treatment improves the future of these patients. However, the anesthetic management during this procedure remains poorly studied and depends mainly on the experience of the responsible physician.
The aims of this prospective study are to be able to explore, on the basis of a detailed analysis of the patient profile (morphological data, medical/surgical history, drug treatment, etc.) and the various aspects of the endoscopic procedure (type of approach, procedure duration, dissection length, etc.), elements predictable for the occurrence of adverse events/complications (pneumoperitoneum, pneumothorax, haemorrhage, etc.); as well as being able to correlate the measurement (percutaneous puncture) of the intra-abdominal pressure to the variations of the respiratory and hemodynamic parameters of the patient in the event of a complication such as pneumoperitoneum. The results of this present project could make it possible to propose a more optimized anesthetic and gastroenterological management protocol for future patients, making it possible to minimize the risk of abdominal distension, as well as its respiratory and hemodynamic consequences.
Potential participants will all be seen, informed and will be offered their participation in the study in preoperative anesthesia consultation, at the Lausanne University Hospital, at least 24 hours before the intervention. Once the eligibility criteria have been verified, the information and consent documents will be presented and detailed. The investigator will explain to each potential participant during the preoperative anesthesia consultation, the nature of the study, its purpose, the procedures involved, the expected duration, the potential risks and benefits, and any discomfort it may cause. Each participant will be informed that his/her participation in the study is voluntary and that he/she can withdraw from the study at any time and that the withdrawal of his/her consent will not affect his/her subsequent medical follow-up and treatment. The participant will be informed that his medical file may be examined by authorized persons other than his attending physician. All potential study participants will receive an information sheet and consent form describing the study and providing enough information for the participant to make an informed decision about participating in the study. The patient will have enough time (at least 24 hours) to decide whether or not to participate. If accepted, the consent form will be signed and dated by the investigator or his representative at the same time as the participant's signature on the day of the intervention. A copy of the signed informed consent will be given to the study participant. The consent form will be retained as part of the study records. The anesthetic evaluation during the consultation will always be done according to the criteria in force in our department. At each stage of the study, the patient will have the possibility of contacting an anesthesiologist, in case of questions, and withdrawing their consent to participate in the study without having to justify it.
This study is exploratory in nature, with a primarily descriptive primary objective. The sample size is therefore not based on formal statistical methods. This is rather based on a feasibility estimate of the number of patients that can be included in 24 months by the anesthesiology department. According to the experience of this service, and taking into account the refusal of certain patients to participate in the study, 60 to 150 patients called for endoscopy treatment of the POEM or GPOEM type could be recruited in 24 months. Cases of pneumoperitoneum at the CHUV represent approximately 20% of patients having this type of treatment; we therefore estimate that the data from approximately thirty patients would serve for the exploratory analysis of the secondary objective of correlation between the modifications of the respiratory and hemodynamic parameters and the intra-abdominal pressure values.
The primary objective is to describe the profile of patients in the presence or absence of adverse events. For each of the 2 groups, the following descriptions will be made:
- Continuous variables: minimum, 1st quartile, median, 2nd quartile, maximum (if deemed useful the results will be accompanied by a graphic representation: box-plot, dot-plot or violin plot)
- Qualitative variable: frequency and proportion per group
The secondary objectives are:
- Identify predictors of adverse events/complications A logistic regression will be performed using a regularization method (lasso, elastic net) or by selecting a restricted set of variables (3 maximum). As this analysis is exploratory, and therefore, before fitting any type of regression model, the primary analysis described above will help to understand which models can be fitted, which covariate might or might not be included in the model.
- Correlate changes in respiratory and hemodynamic parameters to intra-abdominal pressure values
The factors studied will be the respiratory parameters (ventilatory mode, peak pressure, plateau pressure, tidal volume, pressure support level, respiratory rate, PEEP, FiO2, SpO2 and exhaled CO2) and hemodynamic values (mean arterial pressure, heart rate and use of vasopressors) throughout the endoscopic procedure. Correlations will be made on the subgroup of patients who have had pneumoperitoneum (estimate of about thirty patients). The Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients as well as their 95% confidence intervals will be provided for the correlations between the continuous variables, the qualitative ones, respectively. For correlations between continuous and qualitative variables, the logistic regression method will be applied. The contingency tables will be presented in the case of two qualitative variables.
- Conditions
- Esophageal Achalasia, Gastroparesis
- Being tested
- General anesthesia for per-oral endoscopic myotomy
- Keywords
- Anesthesia, Pneumoperitoneum, POEM, GPOEM
- Medical subject headings
- Esophageal Achalasia, Gastroparesis, Pneumoperitoneum
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
General anesthesia for per-oral endoscopic myotomyProcedure or surgery
Intra-abdominal pressure measurement
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Describe in detail the profile of operated patients and the various characteristics of the endoscopic procedure, in the presence or absence of adverse events/complications.
Measured: 48 hours
Secondary outcomes (2)
Verify the presence of predictable elements of adverse events
Measured: 48 hours
Look for a correlation between the modifications of the respiratory and hemodynamic parameters with the values of intra-abdominal pressure measured, during the exsufflations by stages of the pneumoperitoneums
Measured: 48hours
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Nov 2022
- Study start1 Nov 2022
- Primary completion1 Nov 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Nov 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (10)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Esophageal AchalasiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire VaudoisThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Chollet-Rivier, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois
- Investigators
- Madeleine Chollet-Rivier, Principal investigator, University of Lausanne Hospitals
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05602272
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- POEM/GPOEM
- Status last verified
- Feb 2023
- First submitted
- 27 Oct 2022
- Last updated
- 8 Feb 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Bang YS, Park C. Anesthetic Consideration for Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy. Clin Endosc. 2019 Nov;52(6):549-555. doi: 10.5946/ce.2019.033. Epub 2019 Jul 10.
PubMed 31288505Darisetty S, Nabi Z, Ramchandani M, Chavan R, Kotla R, Nageshwar Reddy D. Anesthesia in per-oral endoscopic myotomy: A large tertiary care centre experience. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2017 Jul;36(4):305-312. doi: 10.1007/s12664-017-0782-0. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
PubMed 28840505Jayan N, Jacob JS, Mathew M, Mukkada RJ. Anesthesia for peroral endoscopic myotomy: A retrospective case series. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2016 Jul-Sep;32(3):379-81. doi: 10.4103/0970-9185.188829.
PubMed 27625490Loser B, Werner YB, Punke MA, Saugel B, Haas S, Reuter DA, Mann O, Dupree A, Schachschal G, Rosch T, Petzoldt M. Anesthetic considerations for patients with esophageal achalasia undergoing peroral endoscopic myotomy: a retrospective case series review. Can J Anaesth. 2017 May;64(5):480-488. doi: 10.1007/s12630-017-0820-5. Epub 2017 Jan 23.
PubMed 28116675Nishihara Y, Yoshida T, Ooi M, Obata N, Izuta S, Mizobuchi S. Anesthetic management and associated complications of peroral endoscopic myotomy: A case series. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Sep 16;10(9):193-199. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v10.i9.193.
PubMed 30283602Okada T, Izuta S, Mizobuchi S. A case of ventilatory impairment during per-oral endoscopic myotomy under general anesthesia. JA Clin Rep. 2018 Feb 26;4(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s40981-018-0160-7.
PubMed 32026954Podboy A, Hwang JH, Nguyen LA, Garcia P, Zikos TA, Kamal A, Triadafilopoulos G, Clarke JO. Gastric per-oral endoscopic myotomy: Current status and future directions. World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Jun 7;25(21):2581-2590. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i21.2581.
PubMed 31210711Sosa G, Gandham N, Landeras V, Calimag AP, Lerma E. Abdominal compartment syndrome. Dis Mon. 2019 Jan;65(1):5-19. doi: 10.1016/j.disamonth.2018.04.003. Epub 2018 Nov 17. No abstract available.
PubMed 30454823Werner YB, von Renteln D, Noder T, Schachschal G, Denzer UW, Groth S, Nast JF, Kersten JF, Petzoldt M, Adam G, Mann O, Repici A, Hassan C, Rosch T. Early adverse events of per-oral endoscopic myotomy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Apr;85(4):708-718.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.08.033. Epub 2016 Sep 5.
PubMed 27609778Maunder RJ, Pierson DJ, Hudson LD. Subcutaneous and mediastinal emphysema. Pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management. Arch Intern Med. 1984 Jul;144(7):1447-53.
PubMed 6375617
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Feb 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Respiratory and Hemodynamic Implications of Endoscopic Myotomy of the Esophagus and Stomach (POEM/GPOEM)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05602272
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- POEM/GPOEM
- Conditions
- Esophageal Achalasia, Gastroparesis
- Keywords
- Anesthesia, Pneumoperitoneum, POEM, GPOEM
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire VaudoisUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Nov 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Nov 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Nov 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 2 Nov 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this observational study is to learn about hemodynamic and respiratory repercussions during general anesthesia in patients with achalasia or gastroparesis who underwent an endoscopic treatment such as a peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) or gastric (GPOEM).
The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Are there predictable elements reliable to this study-population for the occurrence of adverse events/complications?
- Is there a correlation between the value (percutaneous puncture) of the intra-abdominal pressure and the variations of the patient's respiratory and hemodynamic parameters in the event of a pneumoperitoneum complication?
Participants will be treated with the usual standard of care for this procedure and no additional or specific therapy will be planned for this study.
Detailed description
During the last ten years, the treatment of motor disorders of the esophagus and gastroparesis, by endoscopic approach, has become widespread. Because of its safety and effectiveness, this endoscopic technique has become the gold standard in esophageal and gastric motility disorders. This procedure consists of performing, under general anesthesia, a myotomy of the lower esophageal or pyloric sphincter, by performing a dissection under the mucous membrane beforehand. To properly expose the surgical site, the operator uses CO2, usually at a low flow rate, to reduce the risk of complications. However, subcutaneous emphysema (especially cervical), pneumoperitoneum, pneumothorax and pneumomediastinum occur in about 7.5-55% of cases, according to the literature. These adverse events frequently coincide with anesthetic difficulties. Indeed, the accumulation of CO2 outside the digestive lumen can disrupt mechanical ventilation (restrictive effect) by increasing intra-abdominal or intra-thoracic pressure. Consequently, the inspiratory pressure increases, the tidal volume decreases and the patient can desaturate. Therefore, stopping the endoscopic procedure is necessary and percutaneous CO2 exsufflation is indicated.
The recent evolution of endoscopic treatment improves the future of these patients. However, the anesthetic management during this procedure remains poorly studied and depends mainly on the experience of the responsible physician.
The aims of this prospective study are to be able to explore, on the basis of a detailed analysis of the patient profile (morphological data, medical/surgical history, drug treatment, etc.) and the various aspects of the endoscopic procedure (type of approach, procedure duration, dissection length, etc.), elements predictable for the occurrence of adverse events/complications (pneumoperitoneum, pneumothorax, haemorrhage, etc.); as well as being able to correlate the measurement (percutaneous puncture) of the intra-abdominal pressure to the variations of the respiratory and hemodynamic parameters of the patient in the event of a complication such as pneumoperitoneum. The results of this present project could make it possible to propose a more optimized anesthetic and gastroenterological management protocol for future patients, making it possible to minimize the risk of abdominal distension, as well as its respiratory and hemodynamic consequences.
Potential participants will all be seen, informed and will be offered their participation in the study in preoperative anesthesia consultation, at the Lausanne University Hospital, at least 24 hours before the intervention. Once the eligibility criteria have been verified, the information and consent documents will be presented and detailed. The investigator will explain to each potential participant during the preoperative anesthesia consultation, the nature of the study, its purpose, the procedures involved, the expected duration, the potential risks and benefits, and any discomfort it may cause. Each participant will be informed that his/her participation in the study is voluntary and that he/she can withdraw from the study at any time and that the withdrawal of his/her consent will not affect his/her subsequent medical follow-up and treatment. The participant will be informed that his medical file may be examined by authorized persons other than his attending physician. All potential study participants will receive an information sheet and consent form describing the study and providing enough information for the participant to make an informed decision about participating in the study. The patient will have enough time (at least 24 hours) to decide whether or not to participate. If accepted, the consent form will be signed and dated by the investigator or his representative at the same time as the participant's signature on the day of the intervention. A copy of the signed informed consent will be given to the study participant. The consent form will be retained as part of the study records. The anesthetic evaluation during the consultation will always be done according to the criteria in force in our department. At each stage of the study, the patient will have the possibility of contacting an anesthesiologist, in case of questions, and withdrawing their consent to participate in the study without having to justify it.
This study is exploratory in nature, with a primarily descriptive primary objective. The sample size is therefore not based on formal statistical methods. This is rather based on a feasibility estimate of the number of patients that can be included in 24 months by the anesthesiology department. According to the experience of this service, and taking into account the refusal of certain patients to participate in the study, 60 to 150 patients called for endoscopy treatment of the POEM or GPOEM type could be recruited in 24 months. Cases of pneumoperitoneum at the CHUV represent approximately 20% of patients having this type of treatment; we therefore estimate that the data from approximately thirty patients would serve for the exploratory analysis of the secondary objective of correlation between the modifications of the respiratory and hemodynamic parameters and the intra-abdominal pressure values.
The primary objective is to describe the profile of patients in the presence or absence of adverse events. For each of the 2 groups, the following descriptions will be made:
- Continuous variables: minimum, 1st quartile, median, 2nd quartile, maximum (if deemed useful the results will be accompanied by a graphic representation: box-plot, dot-plot or violin plot)
- Qualitative variable: frequency and proportion per group
The secondary objectives are:
- Identify predictors of adverse events/complications A logistic regression will be performed using a regularization method (lasso, elastic net) or by selecting a restricted set of variables (3 maximum). As this analysis is exploratory, and therefore, before fitting any type of regression model, the primary analysis described above will help to understand which models can be fitted, which covariate might or might not be included in the model.
- Correlate changes in respiratory and hemodynamic parameters to intra-abdominal pressure values
The factors studied will be the respiratory parameters (ventilatory mode, peak pressure, plateau pressure, tidal volume, pressure support level, respiratory rate, PEEP, FiO2, SpO2 and exhaled CO2) and hemodynamic values (mean arterial pressure, heart rate and use of vasopressors) throughout the endoscopic procedure. Correlations will be made on the subgroup of patients who have had pneumoperitoneum (estimate of about thirty patients). The Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients as well as their 95% confidence intervals will be provided for the correlations between the continuous variables, the qualitative ones, respectively. For correlations between continuous and qualitative variables, the logistic regression method will be applied. The contingency tables will be presented in the case of two qualitative variables.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 99 years
- Sex
- All
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients with achalasia or gastroparesis who are summoned for POEM or GPOEM type endoscopy treatment at the Lausanne University Hospital.
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Completed and signed consent form (consent form attached)
- Age ≥ 18 years old
- Anesthetic risk classification according to ASA, from 1 to 3
- Patients summoned for POEM or GPOEM type endoscopy treatment
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Inability to follow study procedures, eg. due to language problems, psychological disorders, dementia, etc. of the participant
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| General anesthesia for per-oral endoscopic myotomyIntra-abdominal pressure measurement | Procedure or surgery | – |
Primary outcome
Describe in detail the profile of operated patients and the various characteristics of the endoscopic procedure, in the presence or absence of adverse events/complications.
Time frame: 48 hours
2 secondary outcomes
Verify the presence of predictable elements of adverse events
Time frame: 48 hours
Look for a correlation between the modifications of the respiratory and hemodynamic parameters with the values of intra-abdominal pressure measured, during the exsufflations by stages of the pneumoperitoneums
Time frame: 48hours
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Feb 2023.
- Results publication: PubMed 31288505Bang YS, Park C. Anesthetic Consideration for Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy. Clin Endosc. 2019 Nov;52(6):549-555. doi: 10.5946/ce.2019.033. Epub 2019 Jul 10.
- Results publication: PubMed 28840505Darisetty S, Nabi Z, Ramchandani M, Chavan R, Kotla R, Nageshwar Reddy D. Anesthesia in per-oral endoscopic myotomy: A large tertiary care centre experience. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2017 Jul;36(4):305-312. doi: 10.1007/s12664-017-0782-0. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
- Results publication: PubMed 27625490Jayan N, Jacob JS, Mathew M, Mukkada RJ. Anesthesia for peroral endoscopic myotomy: A retrospective case series. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2016 Jul-Sep;32(3):379-81. doi: 10.4103/0970-9185.188829.
- Results publication: PubMed 28116675Loser B, Werner YB, Punke MA, Saugel B, Haas S, Reuter DA, Mann O, Dupree A, Schachschal G, Rosch T, Petzoldt M. Anesthetic considerations for patients with esophageal achalasia undergoing peroral endoscopic myotomy: a retrospective case series review. Can J Anaesth. 2017 May;64(5):480-488. doi: 10.1007/s12630-017-0820-5. Epub 2017 Jan 23.
- Results publication: PubMed 30283602Nishihara Y, Yoshida T, Ooi M, Obata N, Izuta S, Mizobuchi S. Anesthetic management and associated complications of peroral endoscopic myotomy: A case series. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Sep 16;10(9):193-199. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v10.i9.193.
- Results publication: PubMed 32026954Okada T, Izuta S, Mizobuchi S. A case of ventilatory impairment during per-oral endoscopic myotomy under general anesthesia. JA Clin Rep. 2018 Feb 26;4(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s40981-018-0160-7.
- Results publication: PubMed 31210711Podboy A, Hwang JH, Nguyen LA, Garcia P, Zikos TA, Kamal A, Triadafilopoulos G, Clarke JO. Gastric per-oral endoscopic myotomy: Current status and future directions. World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Jun 7;25(21):2581-2590. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i21.2581.
- Results publication: PubMed 30454823Sosa G, Gandham N, Landeras V, Calimag AP, Lerma E. Abdominal compartment syndrome. Dis Mon. 2019 Jan;65(1):5-19. doi: 10.1016/j.disamonth.2018.04.003. Epub 2018 Nov 17. No abstract available.
- Results publication: PubMed 27609778Werner YB, von Renteln D, Noder T, Schachschal G, Denzer UW, Groth S, Nast JF, Kersten JF, Petzoldt M, Adam G, Mann O, Repici A, Hassan C, Rosch T. Early adverse events of per-oral endoscopic myotomy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Apr;85(4):708-718.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.08.033. Epub 2016 Sep 5.
- Results publication: PubMed 6375617Maunder RJ, Pierson DJ, Hudson LD. Subcutaneous and mediastinal emphysema. Pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management. Arch Intern Med. 1984 Jul;144(7):1447-53.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Esophageal Achalasia
RecruitingObservational study
Rare Disease Patient Registry & Natural History Study - Coordination of Rare Diseases at Sanford
Rare Disorders, Undiagnosed Disorders
RecruitingPhase 2
Full-thickness Versus Progressive Myotomy in Peroral Endoscopic Esophageal Myotomy in Achalasia: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Achalasia Cardia, Achalasia
RecruitingPhase 3
PREcision MEDicine In Achalasia (PREMEDIA)
Type I Achalasia, Type II Achalasia
RecruitingObservational study
PREcision MEDicine In Achalasia (PREMEDIA) - Cohort
Type III Achalasia, EGJ Outflow Obstruction With Spastic/Hypercontractile Features
RecruitingPhase 4
VZV in the Enteric Nervous System: Pathogenesis and Consequences
Achalasia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Madeleine Chollet-Rivier principal investigator
University of Lausanne Hospitals
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Esophageal Achalasia and Gastroparesis, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois at 1 site in Switzerland.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Feb 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Aldo Cavuoto (795565766 ext. +41, aldo.cavuoto@chuv.ch), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Describe in detail the profile of operated patients and the various characteristics of the endoscopic procedure, in the presence or absence of adverse events/complications. (time frame: 48 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05602272, which also lists 10 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Feb 2023.