AzTrials
AzTrials

Cardiogenic ShockCERAMICSNCT05800951

Can Escalation Reduce Acute Myocardial Infarction Mortality in Cardiogenic Shock

An observational study of Cardiogenic Shock and Acute Myocardial Infarction, run by Henry Ford Health System at 17 sites in United States.

Active, not recruiting

Under way, not looking for participants. Everyone needed has enrolled. The study is still running.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The CERAMICS study is designed to more clearly delineate the current care of acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock (AMICS) patients who are treated with mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices in the United States with significant experience in MCS, all of whom have the capability of MCS escalation… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
How many people
124 participants
Where
17 sitesUnited States
Study dates
22 Jul 2022to 31 Dec 2026
How long will I take part?
1 Year
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients who present with an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) with cardiogenic shock (AMICS) prior to PCI.

Who may be able to join

  • Diagnosis of acute AMI confirmed by a medical professional, with changes in serum biomarkers or evidence of ischemic EKG changes (STEMI or NSTEMI).
  • Cardiogenic Shock present as defined by the presence of 2 OR MORE of the following criteria prior to PCI:
  • Hypotension: systolic blood pressure ≤ 90mmHg at baseline (prior to PCI) or the use of inotropes or vasopressors to maintain SBP ≥ 90mmHg
  • Evidence of end organ hypoperfusion: elevated serum lactate levels (venous or arterial), cool extremities, oliguria/anuria
  • Hemodynamic criteria: Cardiac Index of < 2.2 L/min/m2 or a cardiac power output (CPO) of ≤ 0.6 watts
  • Patient underwent PCI within 12 hours of hospital presentation.

Who cannot join

  • AMICS patients who meet any of the following study exclusion criteria will have a limited set of data collected via a single-page Patient Exclusion Form completed and submitted within 45 days of hospital discharge, which includes the reason for exclusion, date of index PCI, and assessment of patient survival to hospital discharge:
  • Evidence of Anoxic Brain Injury
  • Unwitnessed out of hospital cardiac arrest or any cardiac arrest in which return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) is not achieved within 30 minutes
  • IABP placed prior to MCS
  • Septic, anaphylactic, hemorrhagic, and neurologic causes of shock
  • Non-ischemic causes of shock/hypotension (pulmonary embolism, pneumothorax, myocarditis, tamponade, etc.)
Show all 12Show fewer
  • Active bleeding for which MCS is contraindicated
  • Recent major surgery for which MCS is contraindicated
  • Mechanical complications of AMI (acute ventricular septal defect (VSD) or acute papillary muscle rupture)
  • Known left ventricular thrombus for which MCS is contraindicated
  • Mechanical aortic prosthetic valve
  • Contraindication to intravenous systemic anticoagulation which precludes placement of MCS.

Trial locations and contacts

17 sites in 1 country.

17 sites in 1 country

United States17 sites
  • Lehigh Valley Hospital-Cedar Crest

    Allentown, Pennsylvania, 18103

  • Northside Hospital Atlanta

    Atlanta, Georgia, 30342

  • UVA University Hospital

    Charlottesville, Virginia, 22903

  • Henry Ford Hospital

    Detroit, Michigan, 48202

  • Ascenion St. John Hospital

    Detroit, Michigan, 48236

  • St. Elizabeth Edgewood Hospital

    Edgewood, Kentucky, 41017

  • Spectrum Health Hospitals Fred and Lena Meijer Heart Center

    Grand Rapids, Michigan, 49503

  • Fort Sanders Regional Medical Center

    Knoxville, Tennessee, 37916

  • St. Anthony Hospital

    Lakewood, Colorado, 80228

  • Loma Linda University Medical Center

    Loma Linda, California, 92354

  • Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center

    Los Angeles, California, 90095

  • TriStar Centennial Medical Center

    Nashville, Tennessee, 37203

  • Parkwest Medical Center

    Nashville, Tennessee, 37923

  • Hackensack Meridian Jersey Shore University Medical Center

    Neptune City, New Jersey, 07753

  • Providence St. Joseph Hospital Orange

    Orange, California, 92868

  • Methodist Hospital

    San Antonio, Texas, 78229

  • George Washington University Hospital

    Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20037

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Can Escalation Reduce Acute Myocardial Infarction Mortality in Cardiogenic Shock (CERAMICS Study)

The CERAMICS study is designed to more clearly delineate the current care of acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock (AMICS) patients who are treated with mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices in the United States with significant experience in MCS, all of whom have the capability of MCS escalation on-site. Study enrollment is targeted at 120 patients at 20 hospital sites, evaluating clinical outcomes, and focusing on outcomes MCS escalation decision making and ICU level management.

Read the detailed description

The National Cardiogenic Shock Initiative (NCSI) was an initial step in helping to provide team based protocolized care in AMICS. Over the past 5 years, further evaluation and research has helped identify additional best practices that may contribute to further improving outcomes.

Vasopressors have been identified as being independently associated with worse outcomes and MCS escalation may lead to improvement. While sites participating in the NCSI were early adopters of MCS in AMICS, MCS escalation was open ended and dictated by variable local practice patterns. This contributed to the overall low rate of MCS escalation which occurred in NCSI.

Approximately 30-40% of patients with AMICS have concomitant right ventricular failure (RVF), which is associated with worse morality and may therefore benefit from consideration of early right ventricular mechanical circulatory support (RV-MCS) devices.

A total of 20 total sites will be accepted into the CERAMICS study with the goal of gathering data and outcomes of 120 patients treated at participating centers. The study is expected to collect data for approximately 2 years. Prior to joining the study, each site must have broad adoption of the NCSI treatment algorithm as the standard of care for AMICS among at least 80% of the interventional cardiologists who take STEMI call, as confirmed by the site principal investigator (PI).

It is critically important to track consecutive AMICS patients at each site to assess outcomes by identifying the total sample size treated and to help identify if there were particular biases regarding the use of MCS or escalation of MCS. We will also track survival to hospital discharge of those AMICS patients not treated with MCS via an exclusion form, as well as with patients treated with MCS including when care deviates from the study protocol.

All study data collection is occurring retrospectively at each time-point only using EMR, and there will be no contact between study personnel and patients. Patients will be discharged or deceased at the time of study entry. During participation in the study, study sites will regularly screen all acute MI patient records (STEMI and NSTEMI) for patients who presented with cardiogenic shock (AMICS) via a screening form.

Medical subject headings
Shock, Cardiogenic, ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction, Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Hospital discharge survival/survival at 30 days

    Hospital discharge survival/survival at 30 days

    Measured: Hospital discharge survival/survival at 30 days

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. All-cause mortality at 1 year

    All-cause mortality at 1 year

    Measured: All-cause mortality at 1 year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 Apr 2023
  2. Study start22 Jul 2022
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
124 participants (actual)
Target duration
1 Year
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05800951
Sponsor's protocol ID
CERAMICS
Acronym
CERAMICS
Status last verified
Apr 2026
First submitted
5 Dec 2022
Last updated
17 Apr 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Basir MB, Schreiber T, Dixon S, Alaswad K, Patel K, Almany S, Khandelwal A, Hanson I, George A, Ashbrook M, Blank N, Abdelsalam M, Sareen N, Timmis SBH, O'Neill Md WW. Feasibility of early mechanical circulatory support in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: The Detroit cardiogenic shock initiative. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Feb 15;91(3):454-461. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27427. Epub 2017 Dec 20.

    PubMed 29266676
  • Hanson ID, Tagami T, Mando R, Kara Balla A, Dixon SR, Timmis S, Almany S, Naidu SS, Baran D, Lemor A, Gorgis S, O'Neill W, Basir MB; National Cardiogenic Shock Investigators. SCAI shock classification in acute myocardial infarction: Insights from the National Cardiogenic Shock Initiative. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Nov;96(6):1137-1142. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29139. Epub 2020 Jul 16.

    PubMed 32672388
  • Goldsweig AM, Tak HJ, Alraies MC, Park J, Smith C, Baker J, Lin L, Patel N, O'Neill WW, Basir MB; National Cardiogenic Shock Initiative Investigators. Mechanical Circulatory Support Following Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: Insights From the National Cardiogenic Shock Initiative. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2021 Nov;32:58-62. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2020.12.021. Epub 2020 Dec 23.

    PubMed 33358390
  • Lemor A, Basir MB, Gorgis S, Todd J, Marso S, Gelormini J, Akhtar Y, Baker J, Chahin J, Abdul-Waheed M, Thukral N, O'Neill W. Impact of Age in Acute Myocardial Infarction Cardiogenic Shock: Insights From the National Cardiogenic Shock Initiative. Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2021 Sep 1;20(3):163-167. doi: 10.1097/HPC.0000000000000255.

    PubMed 33606413
  • Basir MB, Kapur NK, Patel K, Salam MA, Schreiber T, Kaki A, Hanson I, Almany S, Timmis S, Dixon S, Kolski B, Todd J, Senter S, Marso S, Lasorda D, Wilkins C, Lalonde T, Attallah A, Larkin T, Dupont A, Marshall J, Patel N, Overly T, Green M, Tehrani B, Truesdell AG, Sharma R, Akhtar Y, McRae T 3rd, O'Neill B, Finley J, Rahman A, Foster M, Askari R, Goldsweig A, Martin S, Bharadwaj A, Khuddus M, Caputo C, Korpas D, Cawich I, McAllister D, Blank N, Alraies MC, Fisher R, Khandelwal A, Alaswad K, Lemor A, Johnson T, Hacala M, O'Neill WW; National Cardiogenic Shock Initiative Investigators. Improved Outcomes Associated with the use of Shock Protocols: Updates from the National Cardiogenic Shock Initiative. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Jun 1;93(7):1173-1183. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28307. Epub 2019 Apr 25.

    PubMed 31025538
  • Ahlers MJ, Srivastava PK, Basir MB, O'Neill WW, Hacala M, Ammar K, Khalil S, Hollowed J, Nsair A. Characteristics and outcomes of patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock during COVID-19. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Oct;100(4):568-574. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30390. Epub 2022 Sep 7.

    PubMed 36073018

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Cardiogenic Shock and Acute Myocardial Infarction, run by Henry Ford Health System at 17 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 17 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Hospital discharge survival/survival at 30 days (time frame: Hospital discharge survival/survival at 30 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05800951, which also lists 6 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Apr 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in