Quality of LifeBEPSNCT05826691
Benign Prostate Surgery and QOL and Sexual Function
An observational study of Quality of Life and Sexual Dysfunction, run by Istanbul Medipol University Hospital at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
Rationale: A variety of surgical techniques have been described for surgical treatment of male LUTS because of BPH, which has different outcomes and may result in adverse events regarding ejaculatory function and erection, resulting in a negative impact on QOL on short- and mid-term follow-ups. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 40 to 90 years, men only
- Conditions the study is for
- Quality of Life, Sexual Dysfunction, Ejaculatory Dysfunction
- What is being tested?
- Monopolar / Bipolar Transurethral resection of prostate (TURP), photovaporisation (PVP), Plasmakinetic (PK), Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HOLEP) or open prostatectomy (OP)).
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 1,200 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 1 Sep 2021to 30 Sep 2023
- How long will I take part?
- 6 Months
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 40 to 90 years
- Men only
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Adult male patients, complaining of LUTS who require surgery because BPH
Who may be able to join
- Has signed informed consent
- Is aged 40 years or older
- With or without erectile function and/or antegrade ejaculation
- No limitation for prostate volume
- Height 150-250 cm
- Weight 40-150 kg
Show all 9Show fewer
- Age 40-90 years old
- PSA 0.1-30 ng/ml
- Creatinine 0.5-4mg/dl
Who cannot join
- History of BPH surgery
- History of pelvic radiation
- History of chronic prostatitis or chronic pelvic pain syndrome
- History of urethral stricture
- History of bladder neck contracture
- Has or has had tumors in the urinary tract
Show all 14Show fewer
- Has or has had prostate cancer
- Has had previous irradiation of the pelvis
- Has bladder stone
- Has urinary tract infection (UTI)
- Has chronic UTI
- Has neurogenic disorder
- Has conditions associated with a risk of poor protocol compliance
- Has participation in other clinical studies with investigational drugs either concurrently or within the last 30 days
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Turkey (Türkiye)1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Istanbul Medipol University
Istanbul, 34214
Vahit Guzelburc, MD FEBU FACS, +905322856674, vguzelburc@medipol.edu.tr
Johan J de la Rosette, MD PhD, +905376041776, j.j.delarosette@gmail.com
About this study
Official title: Impact of Prostate Surgery for LUTS on Patients' QOL With Emphasis on Sexual- and Ejaculatory Function
Rationale: A variety of surgical techniques have been described for surgical treatment of male LUTS because of BPH, which has different outcomes and may result in adverse events regarding ejaculatory function and erection, resulting in a negative impact on QOL on short- and mid-term follow-ups.
Objective: To compare outcomes of BPH surgery using a conventional versus ejaculation preserving technique on QOL-related aspects with emphasis on ejaculatory and erectile function.
Read more
Study design: This study is a prospective longitudinal multi-center trial to compare the ejaculatory and erectile function outcomes between conventional and ejaculation preserving BPH surgical procedures/techniques. Baseline characteristics will be recorded, as well as short and mid-term follow-up.
Study population: The study population comprises patients who will undergo BPH surgery in the participating centers.
Intervention: All patients will undergo BPH surgery (including but not restricted to Monopolar / Bipolar Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), photo vaporisation (PVP), Plasmakinetic (PK), Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HOLEP) or open prostatectomy (OP)).
Main study parameters/endpoints: Primary endpoint is to compare the baseline to the short-term (3 months) and mid-term (6 months) ejaculation function and QoL outcomes. The secondary endpoint is the short and mid-term erection function and QoL outcomes compared to baseline.
Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit, and group relatedness: Patients' burden and risk associated with participating in this trial do not differ among surgical procedures or techniques used. In all groups, patients will undergo a BPH surgery and will be followed for six months at 3 visits.
Read the detailed description
Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a common condition in aging men, which may lead to lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and sexual dysfunction, negatively impacting the patients' quality of life. Despite allowing relief from LUTS, classical medical and surgical treatments for BPH have always been burdened by important consequences on the patients' sexual and ejaculatory function. Over the past three decades, research has focused on the development of new surgical strategies to reduce morbidity and complications of surgical procedures, however, in most cases overlooking the impact on the patients' quality of life aspects.
Despite the well-documented advantages of Laser techniques over transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) and open prostatectomy (OP), they have not been able to overcome postoperative ejaculatory dysfunction (EjD). It is well known that loss of ejaculation after endoscopic surgery was and is still attributed by many to compromising the ejaculatory mechanism, causing retrograde ejaculation. The ejaculatory mechanism has long been misunderstood and misinterpreted. However, recent evidence on ejaculation physiology has demonstrated the importance of the tissues surrounding the verumontanum, rather than the bladder neck, for outward ejaculation . Dynamic transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) has shown how, just before ejaculation, the verumontanum undergoes a caudal shift, contacting the anterior wall of the urethra, allowing the antegrade progression of semen, which is emitted into the inframontanal urethra and expelled, almost simultaneously, through the external sphincter. No accumulation of semen inside the prostatic urethra, and therefore, generation of a high-pressure area was demonstrated. A fundamental role in this process is played by the musculus ejaculatorious, a longitudinal strain of muscle fibers, which originate from around the ejaculatory ducts and extend caudally in the urethral crest, inserting below the urethral sphincter. Contraction of the musculus ejaculatorious could be responsible not only for the emission of semen from the ejaculatory ducts into the prostatic urethra, but also for the correct movement of the veru montanum during ejaculation. Based on these findings, supramontanal and paracollicular tissue-sparing surgical techniques have been developed. Ejaculation preserving (EP) techniques have been applied to TURP, Photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP) and Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HOLEP) with encouraging results.
EP technique will be performed as:
During BPH open and endoscopic surgery, all prostatic tissue except adjacent to the verumontanum is removed. Ejaculation preserving endoscopic prostatectomy is a new technique, where all apical prostatic tissue is removed by resecting tissue up to 1 cm above the verumontanum laterally and proximally, to preserve antegrade ejaculation.
Operating physicians will report the type or surgery technique in terms of preservation or not of the ejaculation as: "no", "probably no", "probably yes" or "yes"
This study aims to compare the impact of different BPH surgical techniques on QOL by using subjective and objective tools to better demonstrate short- and mid-term outcomes.
Quality of Life related outcomes, (ejaculatory and erectile functions will be assessed by Patients Related outcomes (PROs). The following culturally validated questionnaires will be distributed to the patients at baseline and in the follow-up controls after surgery.
- ShortForm-12 (SF-12)
Consist of 12 generic qualty of life (QOL) questions, scores range between 12-56. The higher scores are associated with QOL.
- International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5):
Consist of 5 questions. Each question scores 1-5, in total scores range between 5-25. The lower scores are associated with with worse erectile function
- Male Sexual Health Questionnaire-Ejaculatory Dysfunction-Short Form (MSHQ-EjD-SF)
Consist of 3 questions for ejaculatory function and 1 question for difficuty in ejaculation. Each question scores 0-5. The higher scores are associated with worse function.
- International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS)
Consist of 7 lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and 1 quality of life questions (QOL). Each LUTS question scores 0-5, in total scores range between 0-35. The higher scores are associated with worse symptoms. QOL question scores 0-6 and the higher score are associated with lower qualty of life.
-Modified Clavien-Dindo grading system for asessment of adverse events and compliacations.
Consist of 5 questions (Question 3 and 4 have 2 subgroubs as a and b). Grade 1 is the minor complication without the need for phamacological treatment or surgical, endoscopic and radiologic interventions. Grade 5 (The highest score) is defined as 'Death of a patient'
Study design This study is a prospective longitudinal multi-center study in which the ejaculation and erection function as well as QoL aspects after BPH surgery for male LUTS are compared between traditional versus ejaculation preserving approach. Each participating center chooses and performs a BPH surgical procedure (TURP, PVP, HOLEP, OP) with or without an ejaculation preserving technique to their discretion. Data from all participating centers will be collected through electronic Case Report Forms (eCRFs), with use of an online Data Management System (DMS), which is located and maintained at Istanbul Medipol University. Faculty in the Division of Biostatistics and Health Informatics at Istanbul Medipol University will perform all data quality checks, analyses and reporting.
Population The study population comprises males (aged >40 years) presenting with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and eligible for BPH operation. All participating institutions are expert centers where secondary/tertiary health care is provided.
Perioperative complications will be graded according the Dindo-Clavien classification
The investigators will assess the objective success of the different interventions by means of Uroflowmetry.
Follow up schedule: patients will be controlled post-operatively by 2 follow-up visits (6-12 week and 6 months)
Data collection and quality control:
Pertinent patient data from all participating centers will be centrally collected through electronic Case Report Forms (eCRFs) through an online Data Management System (DMS), located and maintained at Istanbul Medipol University. Patients will be pseudonymized and only the corresponding PIs in the different Institutions will have access to the identity if necessary.
The Division of Biostatistics and Health Informatics at Istanbul Medipol University will monitor data collection and perform data quality checks, analysis and reporting.
Sample calculation:
The investigators hypothesized that conventional BPH surgical procedures will result in around 1-unit decrease in ejaculation function at 6-month evaluation with respect to baseline (mean normalized scores for age and country) while the ejaculation preserving BPH surgical
procedures will retain the ejaculation function unchanged. In QoL at least 3 units differential improvement are expected with respect to the mean baseline scores at 6-months between the ejaculation preserving and the conventional techniques.
When considering both co-primary objectives a total sample of 1120 participants will be sufficient to detect the differences. By considering an attrition rate of 25% at 6-month, the total enrollment is planned at 1500 participants, of whom around 300 are anticipated to undergo ejaculation preserving BPH surgeries according to previous experience and literature.
Statistical analysis
Primary objective measures will be analysed using an Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) framework where baseline measures and peri- and post-surgery characteristics will be added to the model as covariates, the changse in the co-primary objectives measure from baseline to 6-months as the dependent variable, and the study arm being the primary predictor. In these models, interaction between Study Arm and patient and BPH surgery characteristics will also be investigated. To satisfy the model assumptions, data-transformation approaches such as log-transformation may be applied to the outcome measures as well as the predictors as necessary.
As part of the secondary objectives, surgery-specific subset analysis will be conducted using the ANCOVA approach if available data allows and supports such subset analysis.
Complications and Adverse Events will be described as proportions and compared between the two-arms of the study using Chi-Square or Fisher's exact test and Logistic Regression with baseline measures and peri- and post-surgery characteristics added to the model as covariates as scientifically justified. Poisson regression will be used for repeat events and complications.
The study is designed and will follow the ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects of the Helsinki Declaration of October 2013 (https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki-ethical-principles-for-medical-research-involving-human-subjects/)
Summary of known and potential risks and benefits Follow-up and controls will not differ from the patients control arm in the study.The risks that patients are subject to in this trial do not differ from risks associated with conventional surgery without specific intention to preserve ejaculation. Patients will receive the standard treatment in addition to the extra care that is provided to them in the framework of this study.
- Conditions
- Quality of Life, Sexual Dysfunction, Ejaculatory Dysfunction, Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms, Erectile Dysfunction, Incontinence
- Being tested
- Monopolar / Bipolar Transurethral resection of prostate (TURP), photovaporisation (PVP), Plasmakinetic (PK), Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HOLEP) or open prostatectomy (OP)).
- Medical subject headings
- Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological, Ejaculatory Dysfunction, Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms, Erectile Dysfunction
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Monopolar / Bipolar Transurethral resection of prostate (TURP), photovaporisation (PVP), Plasmakinetic (PK), Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HOLEP) or open prostatectomy (OP)).Procedure or surgery
Also called Open prostatectomy
Any procedure advised by the EAU guidelines to ovrecome bladder outlet obstruction
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Patients required prostate surgery for LUTS | Patients with LUTS attributable to bladder outlet obstruction because BPH Receives: Procedure: Monopolar / Bipolar Transurethral resection of prostate (TURP), photovaporisation (PVP), Plasmakinetic (PK), Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HOLEP) or open prostatectomy (OP)). |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Preservation of QOL after surgery for BPH
QOL will be assessed before and after by means of validated SF-12 questionnaire
Measured: Baseline to 6 months after surgery
Preservation of sexual function after surgery for BPH
Sexual function will be assessed before and after by means of IIEF-5 validated questionnaire
Measured: Baseline to 6 months after surgery
Preservation of ejaculatory function after surgery for BPH
Ejaculatory function will be assessed before and after by means of MSHQ-EjD-SF validated questionnaire
Measured: Baseline to 6 months after surgery
Preservation of voiding function after ejaculation preserving BPH surgery
LUTS will be assessed before and after by means of IPSS validated questionnaire
Measured: Baseline to 6 months after surgery
Secondary outcomes (4)
Comparison of post-operative complications among the different disobstructive methods
Adverse events/complications will be recorded by using Modified Dindo-Clavien for urological surgery
Measured: From the day of the operastion up to 90 days
Comparison objective outcomes of uroflowmetry Qmax parameter (ml/sec) in relation to outcomes in preservation of ejaculation and unpreserved surgery
Pre- and postoperative uroflowmetry maximum flow rate (Qmax; ml/sec) parameter will be compared between ejaculation preserved and ejaculation not preserved operations
Measured: Baseline to 6 months after surgery
Comparison residual urine volumes (Post-voided residual urine, ml) by ultrasound measurement in relation to outcomes in preservation of ejaculation and unpreserved surgery
Pre- and post-operative residual urine volume (PVR, ml) will be assessed by ultrasound will be compared between ejaculation preserved and ejaculation not preserved operations
Measured: Baseline to 6 months after surgery
Comparison changes in erectile function between conventional and preserving ejaculatory techniques by using IIEF-5 validated questionnarie
Pre- and postoperative erectile function will be compared between conventional and preserving ejaculatory
Measured: Baseline to 6 months after surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Apr 2023
- Study start1 Sep 2021
- Primary completion1 Jun 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Sep 2023 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Quality of LifeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 1,200 participants (estimated)
- Target duration
- 6 Months
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Istanbul Medipol University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- TC Erciyes University, Gaziosmanpasa Research and Education Hospital, Goztepe Training and Research Hospital, Prof. Dr. Cemil Tascıoglu Education and Research Hospital Organization, Ankara Education and Research Hospital, Uludag University, Kırıkkale University, SB Istanbul Education and Research Hospital, Kayseri City Hospital, Bagcilar Training and Research Hospital, Ataturk University, Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital, Sultan Abdulhamid Han Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey, Haydarpasa Numune Training and Research Hospital, SBÜ Dr. Sadi Konuk Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research Hospital, Firat University, Recep Tayyip Erdogan University, Yuzuncu Yil University, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Dr. Lutfi Kirdar Kartal Training and Research Hospital, Ankara City Hospital Bilkent, Izmir Katip Celebi University, Haseki Training and Research Hospital
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, vahit guzelburc, Istanbul Medipol University Hospital
- Investigators
- Johan J de la Rosette, MD PhD, Principal investigator, Medipol University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05826691
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- E-10840098-772.02-2928
- Acronym
- BEPS
- Status last verified
- Apr 2023
- First submitted
- 22 Mar 2023
- Last updated
- 24 Apr 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Apr 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Impact of Prostate Surgery for LUTS on Patients' QOL With Emphasis on Sexual- and Ejaculatory Function
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05826691
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BEPS / E-10840098-772.02-2928
- Conditions
- Quality of Life, Sexual Dysfunction, Ejaculatory Dysfunction, Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms, Erectile Dysfunction, Incontinence
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 1,200 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Istanbul Medipol University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- TC Erciyes University, Gaziosmanpasa Research and Education Hospital, Goztepe Training and Research Hospital, Prof. Dr. Cemil Tascıoglu Education and Research Hospital Organization, Ankara Education and Research Hospital, Uludag University, Kırıkkale University, SB Istanbul Education and Research Hospital, Kayseri City Hospital, Bagcilar Training and Research Hospital, Ataturk University, Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital, Sultan Abdulhamid Han Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey, Haydarpasa Numune Training and Research Hospital, SBÜ Dr. Sadi Konuk Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research Hospital, Firat University, Recep Tayyip Erdogan University, Yuzuncu Yil University, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Dr. Lutfi Kirdar Kartal Training and Research Hospital, Ankara City Hospital Bilkent, Izmir Katip Celebi University, Haseki Training and Research Hospital
- Study start
- 1 Sep 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jun 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Sep 2023 (estimated)
- First posted
- 24 Apr 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Rationale: A variety of surgical techniques have been described for surgical treatment of male LUTS because of BPH, which has different outcomes and may result in adverse events regarding ejaculatory function and erection, resulting in a negative impact on QOL on short- and mid-term follow-ups.
Objective: To compare outcomes of BPH surgery using a conventional versus ejaculation preserving technique on QOL-related aspects with emphasis on ejaculatory and erectile function.
Study design: This study is a prospective longitudinal multi-center trial to compare the ejaculatory and erectile function outcomes between conventional and ejaculation preserving BPH surgical procedures/techniques. Baseline characteristics will be recorded, as well as short and mid-term follow-up.
Study population: The study population comprises patients who will undergo BPH surgery in the participating centers.
Intervention: All patients will undergo BPH surgery (including but not restricted to Monopolar / Bipolar Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), photo vaporisation (PVP), Plasmakinetic (PK), Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HOLEP) or open prostatectomy (OP)).
Main study parameters/endpoints: Primary endpoint is to compare the baseline to the short-term (3 months) and mid-term (6 months) ejaculation function and QoL outcomes. The secondary endpoint is the short and mid-term erection function and QoL outcomes compared to baseline.
Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit, and group relatedness: Patients' burden and risk associated with participating in this trial do not differ among surgical procedures or techniques used. In all groups, patients will undergo a BPH surgery and will be followed for six months at 3 visits.
Detailed description
Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a common condition in aging men, which may lead to lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and sexual dysfunction, negatively impacting the patients' quality of life. Despite allowing relief from LUTS, classical medical and surgical treatments for BPH have always been burdened by important consequences on the patients' sexual and ejaculatory function. Over the past three decades, research has focused on the development of new surgical strategies to reduce morbidity and complications of surgical procedures, however, in most cases overlooking the impact on the patients' quality of life aspects.
Despite the well-documented advantages of Laser techniques over transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) and open prostatectomy (OP), they have not been able to overcome postoperative ejaculatory dysfunction (EjD). It is well known that loss of ejaculation after endoscopic surgery was and is still attributed by many to compromising the ejaculatory mechanism, causing retrograde ejaculation. The ejaculatory mechanism has long been misunderstood and misinterpreted. However, recent evidence on ejaculation physiology has demonstrated the importance of the tissues surrounding the verumontanum, rather than the bladder neck, for outward ejaculation . Dynamic transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) has shown how, just before ejaculation, the verumontanum undergoes a caudal shift, contacting the anterior wall of the urethra, allowing the antegrade progression of semen, which is emitted into the inframontanal urethra and expelled, almost simultaneously, through the external sphincter. No accumulation of semen inside the prostatic urethra, and therefore, generation of a high-pressure area was demonstrated. A fundamental role in this process is played by the musculus ejaculatorious, a longitudinal strain of muscle fibers, which originate from around the ejaculatory ducts and extend caudally in the urethral crest, inserting below the urethral sphincter. Contraction of the musculus ejaculatorious could be responsible not only for the emission of semen from the ejaculatory ducts into the prostatic urethra, but also for the correct movement of the veru montanum during ejaculation. Based on these findings, supramontanal and paracollicular tissue-sparing surgical techniques have been developed. Ejaculation preserving (EP) techniques have been applied to TURP, Photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP) and Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HOLEP) with encouraging results.
EP technique will be performed as:
During BPH open and endoscopic surgery, all prostatic tissue except adjacent to the verumontanum is removed. Ejaculation preserving endoscopic prostatectomy is a new technique, where all apical prostatic tissue is removed by resecting tissue up to 1 cm above the verumontanum laterally and proximally, to preserve antegrade ejaculation.
Operating physicians will report the type or surgery technique in terms of preservation or not of the ejaculation as: "no", "probably no", "probably yes" or "yes"
This study aims to compare the impact of different BPH surgical techniques on QOL by using subjective and objective tools to better demonstrate short- and mid-term outcomes.
Quality of Life related outcomes, (ejaculatory and erectile functions will be assessed by Patients Related outcomes (PROs). The following culturally validated questionnaires will be distributed to the patients at baseline and in the follow-up controls after surgery.
- ShortForm-12 (SF-12)
Consist of 12 generic qualty of life (QOL) questions, scores range between 12-56. The higher scores are associated with QOL.
- International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5):
Consist of 5 questions. Each question scores 1-5, in total scores range between 5-25. The lower scores are associated with with worse erectile function
- Male Sexual Health Questionnaire-Ejaculatory Dysfunction-Short Form (MSHQ-EjD-SF)
Consist of 3 questions for ejaculatory function and 1 question for difficuty in ejaculation. Each question scores 0-5. The higher scores are associated with worse function.
- International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS)
Consist of 7 lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and 1 quality of life questions (QOL). Each LUTS question scores 0-5, in total scores range between 0-35. The higher scores are associated with worse symptoms. QOL question scores 0-6 and the higher score are associated with lower qualty of life.
-Modified Clavien-Dindo grading system for asessment of adverse events and compliacations.
Consist of 5 questions (Question 3 and 4 have 2 subgroubs as a and b). Grade 1 is the minor complication without the need for phamacological treatment or surgical, endoscopic and radiologic interventions. Grade 5 (The highest score) is defined as 'Death of a patient'
Study design This study is a prospective longitudinal multi-center study in which the ejaculation and erection function as well as QoL aspects after BPH surgery for male LUTS are compared between traditional versus ejaculation preserving approach. Each participating center chooses and performs a BPH surgical procedure (TURP, PVP, HOLEP, OP) with or without an ejaculation preserving technique to their discretion. Data from all participating centers will be collected through electronic Case Report Forms (eCRFs), with use of an online Data Management System (DMS), which is located and maintained at Istanbul Medipol University. Faculty in the Division of Biostatistics and Health Informatics at Istanbul Medipol University will perform all data quality checks, analyses and reporting.
Population The study population comprises males (aged >40 years) presenting with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and eligible for BPH operation. All participating institutions are expert centers where secondary/tertiary health care is provided.
Perioperative complications will be graded according the Dindo-Clavien classification
The investigators will assess the objective success of the different interventions by means of Uroflowmetry.
Follow up schedule: patients will be controlled post-operatively by 2 follow-up visits (6-12 week and 6 months)
Data collection and quality control:
Pertinent patient data from all participating centers will be centrally collected through electronic Case Report Forms (eCRFs) through an online Data Management System (DMS), located and maintained at Istanbul Medipol University. Patients will be pseudonymized and only the corresponding PIs in the different Institutions will have access to the identity if necessary.
The Division of Biostatistics and Health Informatics at Istanbul Medipol University will monitor data collection and perform data quality checks, analysis and reporting.
Sample calculation:
The investigators hypothesized that conventional BPH surgical procedures will result in around 1-unit decrease in ejaculation function at 6-month evaluation with respect to baseline (mean normalized scores for age and country) while the ejaculation preserving BPH surgical
procedures will retain the ejaculation function unchanged. In QoL at least 3 units differential improvement are expected with respect to the mean baseline scores at 6-months between the ejaculation preserving and the conventional techniques.
When considering both co-primary objectives a total sample of 1120 participants will be sufficient to detect the differences. By considering an attrition rate of 25% at 6-month, the total enrollment is planned at 1500 participants, of whom around 300 are anticipated to undergo ejaculation preserving BPH surgeries according to previous experience and literature.
Statistical analysis
Primary objective measures will be analysed using an Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) framework where baseline measures and peri- and post-surgery characteristics will be added to the model as covariates, the changse in the co-primary objectives measure from baseline to 6-months as the dependent variable, and the study arm being the primary predictor. In these models, interaction between Study Arm and patient and BPH surgery characteristics will also be investigated. To satisfy the model assumptions, data-transformation approaches such as log-transformation may be applied to the outcome measures as well as the predictors as necessary.
As part of the secondary objectives, surgery-specific subset analysis will be conducted using the ANCOVA approach if available data allows and supports such subset analysis.
Complications and Adverse Events will be described as proportions and compared between the two-arms of the study using Chi-Square or Fisher's exact test and Logistic Regression with baseline measures and peri- and post-surgery characteristics added to the model as covariates as scientifically justified. Poisson regression will be used for repeat events and complications.
The study is designed and will follow the ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects of the Helsinki Declaration of October 2013 (https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki-ethical-principles-for-medical-research-involving-human-subjects/)
Summary of known and potential risks and benefits Follow-up and controls will not differ from the patients control arm in the study.The risks that patients are subject to in this trial do not differ from risks associated with conventional surgery without specific intention to preserve ejaculation. Patients will receive the standard treatment in addition to the extra care that is provided to them in the framework of this study.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Target follow-up
- 6 Months
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Patients required prostate surgery for LUTS | – | Procedure: Monopolar / Bipolar Transurethral resection of prostate (TURP), photovaporisation (PVP), Plasmakinetic (PK), Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HOLEP) or open prostatectomy (OP)).Patients with LUTS attributable to bladder outlet obstruction because BPH |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 40 to 90 years
- Sex
- Male only
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Adult male patients, complaining of LUTS who require surgery because BPH
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Has signed informed consent
- Is aged 40 years or older
- With or without erectile function and/or antegrade ejaculation
- No limitation for prostate volume
- Height 150-250 cm
Key exclusion criteria (14 listed)
- History of BPH surgery
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Monopolar / Bipolar Transurethral resection of prostate (TURP), photovaporisation (PVP), Plasmakinetic (PK), Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HOLEP) or open prostatectomy (OP)).Also: Open prostatectomyAny procedure advised by the EAU guidelines to ovrecome bladder outlet obstruction | Procedure or surgery | Patients required prostate surgery for LUTS |
Primary outcome
Preservation of QOL after surgery for BPH
Time frame: Baseline to 6 months after surgery
QOL will be assessed before and after by means of validated SF-12 questionnaire
Preservation of sexual function after surgery for BPH
Time frame: Baseline to 6 months after surgery
Sexual function will be assessed before and after by means of IIEF-5 validated questionnaire
Preservation of ejaculatory function after surgery for BPH
Time frame: Baseline to 6 months after surgery
Ejaculatory function will be assessed before and after by means of MSHQ-EjD-SF validated questionnaire
Preservation of voiding function after ejaculation preserving BPH surgery
Time frame: Baseline to 6 months after surgery
LUTS will be assessed before and after by means of IPSS validated questionnaire
4 secondary outcomes
Comparison of post-operative complications among the different disobstructive methods
Time frame: From the day of the operastion up to 90 days
Comparison objective outcomes of uroflowmetry Qmax parameter (ml/sec) in relation to outcomes in preservation of ejaculation and unpreserved surgery
Time frame: Baseline to 6 months after surgery
Comparison residual urine volumes (Post-voided residual urine, ml) by ultrasound measurement in relation to outcomes in preservation of ejaculation and unpreserved surgery
Time frame: Baseline to 6 months after surgery
Comparison changes in erectile function between conventional and preserving ejaculatory techniques by using IIEF-5 validated questionnarie
Time frame: Baseline to 6 months after surgery
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Apr 2023.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Quality of Life
Active, not recruiting
Effect of the Thrive AI Health App on Lifestyle Behaviors and Quality of Life
Diabetes Type 2, Overweight or Obesity
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
The Impact of Using Nicorandil for the Prevention of Doxorubicin-Induced Cardiotoxicity
Doxorubicin Induced Cardiotoxicity, Doxorubicin Induced Cardiomyopathy
Recruiting
Aquatic Versus Land-Based Exercise in Women With Lipedema
Lipedema
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Development and Validation of a Chinese Quality of Life Scale for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension
Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH), Quality of Life
Recruiting
Basic Body Awareness Therapy in Individuals With Migraine
Migraine
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Johan J de la Rosette, MD PhD principal investigator
Medipol University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Quality of Life and Sexual Dysfunction, run by Istanbul Medipol University Hospital at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 14 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Apr 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Vahit Guzelburc, MD FEBU FACS (+905322856674, vguzelburc@medipol.edu.tr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Preservation of QOL after surgery for BPH (time frame: Baseline to 6 months after surgery). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Apr 2023.