Vaccination FailureNCT05923970
Is a Third Dose of MMRV Vaccine Beneficial for the Adult Population in Alberta?
An observational study of Vaccination Failure and Vaccine Response Impaired, run by University of Alberta at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
The current recommendation for a full course of measles-mumps-rubella-(varicella) vaccine (MMR(V)) is two doses. The problem is, many individuals within the vaccinated cohort show antibody levels that are below the level considered to be protective, even after two doses of vaccine. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Vaccination Failure, Vaccine Response Impaired
- What is being tested?
- Serology for antibody levels - Baseline, Serology to assess cell mediated immune (CMI) response - Baseline and Serology for antibody levels - Post third dose of MMR vaccine
- Type of treatment
- Vaccines
- How many people
- 200 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- 9 Nov 2024to 30 Sep 2027
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: All women who undergo routine prenatal screening for rubella antibodies in Alberta are eligible to participate. The study population will include 100 women with rubella antibodies below 10 IU/ml, and 100 women with antibody levels >=10 IU/ml.
Who may be able to join
- Women who are pregnant and have undergone routine prenatal screening for rubella antibodies.
Who cannot join
- Women younger than 18 years of age
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Canada1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
University of Alberta
Edmonton, Alberta, T6G2R3
Carmen Charlton, 780-407-8975, carmen.charlton@albertahealthservices.ca
About this study
Official title: Is a Third Dose of Measles-mumps-rubella-(Varicella) Vaccine (MMR(V)) Vaccine Beneficial for the Adult Population in Alberta?
The current recommendation for a full course of measles-mumps-rubella-(varicella) vaccine (MMR(V)) is two doses. The problem is, many individuals within the vaccinated cohort show antibody levels that are below the level considered to be protective, even after two doses of vaccine. Because of these waning antibody levels, it is currently unknown whether highly vaccinated populations are protected from infection against measles, mumps, rubella, or varicella should they be exposed to any of these viruses. The uncertainty of a woman's immune status is partly due to the type of testing that is used to indicate protection. While immunity to viral infection requires both a humoral and a cell mediated immune (CMI) response, only humoral (antibody) responses are measured routinely in the laboratory. This study will examine CMI responses and the role of a third dose of vaccine for previously vaccinated women whose antibody levels are below the cut off. This study will not administer vaccine, but rather will include women who have received a third dose of vaccination through routine health care follow up in the study cohort.
Read the detailed description
In highly vaccinated populations, the level of antibody produced against vaccine-preventable diseases has been waning overtime. Many low prevalence countries, including Canada, Israel, Australia, and Finland have reported decreases in the level of IgG for measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella often to below the level that is considered to be protective. These data have questioned the true level of protection in our populations. It is currently unclear if a vaccinated individual with low antibody levels, who was exposed to a vaccine preventable infection, would mount an effective immune response, or if they would develop infection. Susceptibility to infection is particularly concerning for prenatal populations, where exposure to rubella or varicella during pregnancy can result in congenital infection.
Rubella and varicella infection are considered mild, self-limiting illnesses when they affect young healthy children, however fetal infection during the first 16-20 weeks of gestation can result in development of congenital rubella syndrome (CRS), or congenital varicella syndrome (CVS). CRS is associated with severe long-term sequelae including microphthalmia, chorioretinitis, deafness, limb aplasia, and cognitive impairments such as microcephaly, while CVS is associated with skin lesions, neurological defects, limb hypoplasia, and can cause up to 20% fetal mortality. In endemic countries, CRS and CVS continue to be reported at high levels. Worldwide, approximately 100,000 CRS cases are estimated per year, while global estimates are not known for CVS, incidence rates of 1.6-4.3/1,000 were reported in the 1990's in the US. Prevention of these congenital conditions is therefore the primary goal of prenatal programs worldwide.
The standard laboratory method to determine if an individual has protective immunity against rubella and varicella infection is to test for circulating antibodies specific to rubella or varicella. Individuals with immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody levels that are above the assay cut off (>10 IU/ml for rubella and positive for varicella) are considered protected from infection, while individuals with IgG levels that are below the cut off are considered susceptible to infection. Recently, our group has examined the longevity of anti-rubella and anti-varicella IgG levels in pre- and post-vaccination cohorts in the Alberta prenatal population. Following introduction of universal childhood vaccination programs, the level of IgG has decreased relative to age. For rubella, individuals who were born in or after 1981, and for varicella, individuals who were <20 years of age, have significantly lower rubella or varicella IgG levels respectively than those who were born prior to universal childhood vaccination programs (and whose immunity is derived by natural infection). Decreasing antibody levels for rubella, measles, and mumps have also been described in other vaccinated populations, suggesting that waning immunity is specific to populations where endemic transmission has been eliminated, or significantly reduced.
It is difficult to determine whether women whose antibody levels are detectable, but below the protective cut off, would mount a protective immune response upon challenge of viable virus. Disconcertingly, 30% of women undergoing prenatal screening in Alberta with low antibody levels against rubella previously received a full vaccine course (2 doses of a rubella containing vaccine). It is currently unknown whether these vaccinated women would mount an effective immune response, without additional vaccination, or if their infants would be at risk for CRS.
The uncertainty of a woman's immune status is partly due to the type of testing that is used to indicate protection. While immunity to viral infection requires both a humoral and a cell mediated immune (CMI) response, only humoral (antibody) responses are measured routinely in the laboratory.
The live-attenuated measles/mumps/rubella/varicella viruses used in vaccine closely mimic interactions that would be observed between the host and a wild type virus. The attenuated vaccine virus is known to replicate within host cells, similar to wild type virus, and can be detected in the blood of volunteers following vaccination. T cell responses have been shown to be long-lived following vaccination, for example T cell proliferation was observed following rubella-specific peptide stimulation 14-16 years after a single dose of vaccine. Likewise, in children who were vaccinated with live attenuated measles vaccine, only 1.90/100,000 where infected during a measles outbreak in the population 10 years later, while 17.84/100,000 children who received a killed vaccine (which would not effectively stimulate the CMI response), were infected during the same measles outbreak. In the context of herd immunity, low (but detectable) antibody levels may be sufficient to provide immunity to rubella infection, however no correlation between antibody levels and CMI has been performed for large, vaccinated populations.
This study will examine CMI responses and the role of a third dose of vaccine for previously vaccinated women whose antibody levels are below the cut off. This study will not administer vaccine, but rather will include women who have received a third dose of vaccination through routine health care follow up in the study cohort. Rubella antibody levels will be used to separate women into high and low antibody groups. Measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella IgG levels and CMI responses will be measured pre- and post-third vaccine dose to determine the benefits of third dose administration.
- Conditions
- Vaccination Failure, Vaccine Response Impaired
- Being tested
- Serology for antibody levels - Baseline, Serology to assess cell mediated immune (CMI) response - Baseline, Serology for antibody levels - Post third dose of MMR vaccine, Serology to assess CMI - Post third dose of MMR vaccine
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Serology for antibody levels - BaselineDiagnostic test
Measurement of rubella IgG antibody levels at baseline
Serology to assess cell mediated immune (CMI) response - BaselineDiagnostic test
Assessment of cell mediated immune (CMI) response to measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella at baseline.
Serology for antibody levels - Post third dose of MMR vaccineDiagnostic test
Measurement of rubella IgG antibody levels post third dose of MMR vaccine
Serology to assess CMI - Post third dose of MMR vaccineDiagnostic test
Assessment of cell mediated response (CMI) to measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella post third dose of MMR vaccine.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Women with low rubella antibodies | Women with rubella antibodies <10 IU/mL Receives: Diagnostic Test: Serology for antibody levels - Baseline; Diagnostic Test: Serology to assess cell mediated immune (CMI) response - Baseline; Diagnostic Test: Serology for antibody levels - Post third dose of MMR vaccine; Diagnostic Test: Serology to assess CMI - Post third dose of MMR vaccine | |
| Women with high rubella antibodies | Women with rubella antibodies ≥10 IU/mL Receives: Diagnostic Test: Serology for antibody levels - Baseline; Diagnostic Test: Serology to assess cell mediated immune (CMI) response - Baseline |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in rubella antibody level.
Change in immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody level from baseline to post-receipt of a third dose of MMR vaccine.
Measured: Change in level from baseline to 12 months.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Jun 2023
- Study start9 Nov 2024
- Primary completion30 Sep 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Sep 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Vaccination FailureStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of AlbertaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Alberta
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Merck Canada Inc.
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05923970
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- RES00059887
- Status last verified
- Mar 2026
- First submitted
- 16 Jun 2023
- Last updated
- 16 Mar 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Mar 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Is a Third Dose of Measles-mumps-rubella-(Varicella) Vaccine (MMR(V)) Vaccine Beneficial for the Adult Population in Alberta?
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05923970
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- RES00059887
- Conditions
- Vaccination Failure, Vaccine Response Impaired
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of AlbertaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Merck Canada Inc.
- Study start
- 9 Nov 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Sep 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Sep 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 28 Jun 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The current recommendation for a full course of measles-mumps-rubella-(varicella) vaccine (MMR(V)) is two doses. The problem is, many individuals within the vaccinated cohort show antibody levels that are below the level considered to be protective, even after two doses of vaccine. Because of these waning antibody levels, it is currently unknown whether highly vaccinated populations are protected from infection against measles, mumps, rubella, or varicella should they be exposed to any of these viruses. The uncertainty of a woman's immune status is partly due to the type of testing that is used to indicate protection. While immunity to viral infection requires both a humoral and a cell mediated immune (CMI) response, only humoral (antibody) responses are measured routinely in the laboratory. This study will examine CMI responses and the role of a third dose of vaccine for previously vaccinated women whose antibody levels are below the cut off. This study will not administer vaccine, but rather will include women who have received a third dose of vaccination through routine health care follow up in the study cohort.
Detailed description
In highly vaccinated populations, the level of antibody produced against vaccine-preventable diseases has been waning overtime. Many low prevalence countries, including Canada, Israel, Australia, and Finland have reported decreases in the level of IgG for measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella often to below the level that is considered to be protective. These data have questioned the true level of protection in our populations. It is currently unclear if a vaccinated individual with low antibody levels, who was exposed to a vaccine preventable infection, would mount an effective immune response, or if they would develop infection. Susceptibility to infection is particularly concerning for prenatal populations, where exposure to rubella or varicella during pregnancy can result in congenital infection.
Rubella and varicella infection are considered mild, self-limiting illnesses when they affect young healthy children, however fetal infection during the first 16-20 weeks of gestation can result in development of congenital rubella syndrome (CRS), or congenital varicella syndrome (CVS). CRS is associated with severe long-term sequelae including microphthalmia, chorioretinitis, deafness, limb aplasia, and cognitive impairments such as microcephaly, while CVS is associated with skin lesions, neurological defects, limb hypoplasia, and can cause up to 20% fetal mortality. In endemic countries, CRS and CVS continue to be reported at high levels. Worldwide, approximately 100,000 CRS cases are estimated per year, while global estimates are not known for CVS, incidence rates of 1.6-4.3/1,000 were reported in the 1990's in the US. Prevention of these congenital conditions is therefore the primary goal of prenatal programs worldwide.
The standard laboratory method to determine if an individual has protective immunity against rubella and varicella infection is to test for circulating antibodies specific to rubella or varicella. Individuals with immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody levels that are above the assay cut off (>10 IU/ml for rubella and positive for varicella) are considered protected from infection, while individuals with IgG levels that are below the cut off are considered susceptible to infection. Recently, our group has examined the longevity of anti-rubella and anti-varicella IgG levels in pre- and post-vaccination cohorts in the Alberta prenatal population. Following introduction of universal childhood vaccination programs, the level of IgG has decreased relative to age. For rubella, individuals who were born in or after 1981, and for varicella, individuals who were <20 years of age, have significantly lower rubella or varicella IgG levels respectively than those who were born prior to universal childhood vaccination programs (and whose immunity is derived by natural infection). Decreasing antibody levels for rubella, measles, and mumps have also been described in other vaccinated populations, suggesting that waning immunity is specific to populations where endemic transmission has been eliminated, or significantly reduced.
It is difficult to determine whether women whose antibody levels are detectable, but below the protective cut off, would mount a protective immune response upon challenge of viable virus. Disconcertingly, 30% of women undergoing prenatal screening in Alberta with low antibody levels against rubella previously received a full vaccine course (2 doses of a rubella containing vaccine). It is currently unknown whether these vaccinated women would mount an effective immune response, without additional vaccination, or if their infants would be at risk for CRS.
The uncertainty of a woman's immune status is partly due to the type of testing that is used to indicate protection. While immunity to viral infection requires both a humoral and a cell mediated immune (CMI) response, only humoral (antibody) responses are measured routinely in the laboratory.
The live-attenuated measles/mumps/rubella/varicella viruses used in vaccine closely mimic interactions that would be observed between the host and a wild type virus. The attenuated vaccine virus is known to replicate within host cells, similar to wild type virus, and can be detected in the blood of volunteers following vaccination. T cell responses have been shown to be long-lived following vaccination, for example T cell proliferation was observed following rubella-specific peptide stimulation 14-16 years after a single dose of vaccine. Likewise, in children who were vaccinated with live attenuated measles vaccine, only 1.90/100,000 where infected during a measles outbreak in the population 10 years later, while 17.84/100,000 children who received a killed vaccine (which would not effectively stimulate the CMI response), were infected during the same measles outbreak. In the context of herd immunity, low (but detectable) antibody levels may be sufficient to provide immunity to rubella infection, however no correlation between antibody levels and CMI has been performed for large, vaccinated populations.
This study will examine CMI responses and the role of a third dose of vaccine for previously vaccinated women whose antibody levels are below the cut off. This study will not administer vaccine, but rather will include women who have received a third dose of vaccination through routine health care follow up in the study cohort. Rubella antibody levels will be used to separate women into high and low antibody groups. Measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella IgG levels and CMI responses will be measured pre- and post-third vaccine dose to determine the benefits of third dose administration.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Women with low rubella antibodies | – | Diagnostic Test: Serology for antibody levels - Baseline, Diagnostic Test: Serology to assess cell mediated immune (CMI) response - Baseline, Diagnostic Test: Serology for antibody levels - Post third dose of MMR vaccine, Diagnostic Test: Serology to assess CMI - Post third dose of MMR vaccineWomen with rubella antibodies <10 IU/mL |
| Women with high rubella antibodies | – | Diagnostic Test: Serology for antibody levels - Baseline, Diagnostic Test: Serology to assess cell mediated immune (CMI) response - BaselineWomen with rubella antibodies ≥10 IU/mL |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- All women who undergo routine prenatal screening for rubella antibodies in Alberta are eligible to participate. The study population will include 100 women with rubella antibodies below 10 IU/ml, and 100 women with antibody levels >=10 IU/ml.
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Women who are pregnant and have undergone routine prenatal screening for rubella antibodies.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Women younger than 18 years of age
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Serology for antibody levels - BaselineMeasurement of rubella IgG antibody levels at baseline | Diagnostic test | Women with high rubella antibodies, Women with low rubella antibodies |
| Serology to assess cell mediated immune (CMI) response - BaselineAssessment of cell mediated immune (CMI) response to measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella at baseline. | Diagnostic test | Women with high rubella antibodies, Women with low rubella antibodies |
| Serology for antibody levels - Post third dose of MMR vaccineMeasurement of rubella IgG antibody levels post third dose of MMR vaccine | Diagnostic test | Women with low rubella antibodies |
| Serology to assess CMI - Post third dose of MMR vaccineAssessment of cell mediated response (CMI) to measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella post third dose of MMR vaccine. | Diagnostic test | Women with low rubella antibodies |
Primary outcome
Change in rubella antibody level.
Time frame: Change in level from baseline to 12 months.
Change in immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody level from baseline to post-receipt of a third dose of MMR vaccine.
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Mar 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Vaccination Failure
RecruitingObservational study
Rare Disease Patient Registry & Natural History Study - Coordination of Rare Diseases at Sanford
Rare Disorders, Undiagnosed Disorders
Not yet recruiting
Sequential Digital Intervention to Increase Influenza Vaccination in Patients With Heart Failure
Heart Failure, Influenza Vaccination
Recruiting
Intrahospital Influenza Vaccination in Patients at High Cardiovascular Risk (VACC-UP)
Acute Coronary Syndrome, Heart Failure
RecruitingPhase 4
Pre-discharge Influenza Vaccination in Patients Hospitalized for Acute Cardiac Conditions
Myocardial Infarction, Decompensated Chronic Heart Failure
Recruiting
Study of the Impact of Time of Vaccination on Response to Influenza Vaccine in Patients With Chronic Renal Failure
Vaccination; Infection
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Vaccination Failure and Vaccine Response Impaired, run by University of Alberta at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Mar 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Carmen Charlton, PhD (1 (780) 407-8975, carmen.charlton@albertahealthservices.ca), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in rubella antibody level. (time frame: Change in level from baseline to 12 months.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Mar 2026.