AzTrials
AzTrials

VRVREMRESDNCT06766162

Virtual Reality to Improve Patient Experience During Endoscopic Mucosal and Submucosal Resection

A study testing Virtual reality pain distraction and Standard analgesia and sedation in people with VR and Virtual Reality Pain Distraction, run by King's College Hospital NHS Trust at 1 site in United Kingdom.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study explores the feasibility of using Virtual Reality (VR) to manage pain and anxiety during Endoscopic Mucosal (EMR) and Submucosal Dissection (ESD). EMR and ESD often requires sedation or analgesia, which can cause side effects like respiratory or cardiac suppression. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Virtual reality pain distraction and Standard analgesia and sedation
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
40 participants
Where
1 siteUnited Kingdom
Study dates
10 May 2025to 1 Jan 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age ≥18 years
  • Able to consent.
  • Fit to use virtual reality.
  • Patients allocated to appropriate EMR/ ESD lists.

Who cannot join

  • Patients who are unable to consent.
  • Contraindication to use VR including, epilepsy and photosensitivity.
  • Planned other interventional colonoscopy (Polypectomy, Stenting).
  • Visually impaired.
  • Pregnancy.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United Kingdom1 site
  • king's College Hospitals

    London, London, SE5 9RS

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: Virtual Reality and Endoscopic Mucosal and Submucosal Dissection: a Patient Centred Experience "VREMRESD"

This study explores the feasibility of using Virtual Reality (VR) to manage pain and anxiety during Endoscopic Mucosal (EMR) and Submucosal Dissection (ESD). EMR and ESD often requires sedation or analgesia, which can cause side effects like respiratory or cardiac suppression. VR, by immersing patients in a calming virtual environment, has shown potential in reducing pain and anxiety in medical settings. This study aims to evaluate its application in improving pain management and reducing sedation use during EMR and ESD.

Read the detailed description

This study utilizes a prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT) design to evaluate the feasibility of incorporating Virtual Reality (VR) as a method for pain management during Endoscopic mucosal and (EMR) Submucosal Dissection (ESD). Participants will be randomized into two groups: one receiving VR sedation with on-demand analgesia and sedation, and the other following standard sedation protocols. The primary endpoint is to assess the feasibility of integrating VR for pain management during EMR or ESD procedures.

Eligibility criteria ensure that participants are suitable for the study. Patients must be 18 years or older, scheduled for EMR ESD, able to provide informed consent, and proficient in English. Those with contraindications for EMR, ESD, severe impairments affecting VR use, or conditions contraindicating VR are excluded. Endoscopists must be experienced in EMR and ESD, willing to participate, and fluent in English, with non-ESD practitioners or those unwilling to participate excluded.

The study aims to enroll 40 patients (20 per group) and involve five experienced endoscopists from the unit, all of whom will be consented. Secondary endpoints include the proportion of EMR and ESD procedures completed using VR, reductions in sedation and analgesia usage, differences in pain scores between the two groups, and satisfaction levels of both patients and endoscopists.

Follow-up will consist of immediate post-procedure feedback and questionnaires to gather insights on VR's impact. This trial will provide critical data on the potential for VR to enhance patient experience, optimize sedation use, and improve procedural outcomes during EMR and ESD, informing future research and clinical applications.

Being tested
Virtual reality pain distraction, Standard analgesia and sedation
Keywords
VRESD, Virtual reality and ESD, VR and endoscopic submucosal dissection, Virtual reeality and endoscopic submucosal dissection, VRWMR, VREMRESD

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Virtual reality pain distractionOther

    The intervention group in this study will undergo their EMR and ESD procedure with the addition of virtual reality (VR) as a supportive tool. Participants in this group will use a VR headset during the procedure, designed to provide an immersive experience that may help manage pain and anxiety. The use of VR will be integrated alongside the standard care protocol, including routine sedation and pain management practices VR headset is from DRVR, Rescope innovation which is registered as medical device in the UK.

  • Standard analgesia and sedationOther

    Standard local protocol for analgesia and sedation, incorporating fentanyl and midazolam.

Study groups in NCT06766162
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Virtual reality (VR) ArmExperimentalThe VR arm will have a trial run with the VR headset in the endoscopy admission unit. The VR will then be applied at the start of the procedure. If, during the procedure, the patient requests sedation or pain medication, it will be provided. If the patient wishes to remove the VR headset, they may do so at any time.
Receives: Other: Virtual reality pain distraction
Standard ArmActive comparatorThe control group will follow the standard local protocol for analgesia and sedation throughout the procedure.
Receives: Other: Standard analgesia and sedation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. To assess the feasibility for integrating VR as a pain mediation during EMR/ESD procedure.

    This will evaluteed by:

    The completed numbers of ESD procedure with the use of the VR as an additive measure to recduce the need for analgesia and sedation.

    Measured: During the EMR/ESD procedure

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. The change in analgesia and sedation used while using the VR.

    This will be evaluated by calculating the mean amount of diazepam and fentanyl used in both groups to compare the standard pathway for analgesia and sedation with the VR intervention.

    Measured: During the EMR/ESD prcoedure

  2. The difference in pain scores between the two groups.

    Pain scores will be evaluated by collecting pain scores on a Likert scale from 0 to 10, where 0 means no pain and 10 indicates maximum pain. The mean values will be compared between the two groups.

    Measured: baseline, pre-procedure, immediately after the procedure

  3. Patient satisfaction.

    Patient satisfaction will be evaluated by collecting satisfaction scores on a Likert scale from 0 to 10, where 0 means completely dissatisfied and 10 indicates completely satisfied. The mean values will be compared between the two groups.

    Measured: immediately after the procedure

  4. Endoscopist satisfaction.

    Endoscopist satisfaction with performing EMR/ESD using VR or standard intervention groups will be evaluated by collecting satisfaction scores on a Likert scale from 0 to 10, where 0 means completely dissatisfied and 10 indicates completely satisfied. The mean values will be compared between the two groups.

    Measured: immediately after the procedure

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Jan 2025
  2. Study start10 May 2025
  3. Primary completion1 Jan 2026
  4. Study completion1 Jan 2026

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
40 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06766162
Sponsor's protocol ID
24/LO/0785
Other IDs
345381
Acronym
VREMRESD
Status last verified
Dec 2024
First submitted
16 Dec 2024
Last updated
11 Mar 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Liu Q, Zang Y, Zang W, Cai W, Li W, Guo Y, Xin C, Tu X. Implementation of virtual reality technology to decrease patients' pain and nervousness during colonoscopies: a prospective randomised controlled single-blinded trial. Clin Med (Lond). 2022 May;22(3):237-240. doi: 10.7861/clinmed.2022-0001. Epub 2022 Apr 20.

    PubMed 35443967
  • Karaveli Cakir S, Evirgen S. The Effect of Virtual Reality on Pain and Anxiety During Colonoscopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2021 May;32(5):451-457. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2021.191081.

    PubMed 34231475

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Virtual reality pain distraction and Standard analgesia and sedation in people with VR and Virtual Reality Pain Distraction, run by King's College Hospital NHS Trust at 1 site in United Kingdom.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Mar 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

To assess the feasibility for integrating VR as a pain mediation during EMR/ESD procedure. (time frame: During the EMR/ESD procedure). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06766162, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Mar 2026; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 6 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in