Chronic PainNCT06957743
Mechanisms of Mindfulness Meditation and Self-Hypnosis for Pain in Older Adults With Chronic Pain
A study testing Mindfulness Meditation, Therapeutic Hypnosis and Story Listening in people with Chronic Pain, run by University of Washington at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The goal of this study is to better understand how two common psychological treatments for pain work in the brain of older adults living with chronic pain. This study will: 1. evaluate fMRI of adults receiving psychological treatments for chronic pain to determine how these interventions work within older adults, and… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 60 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Chronic Pain
- What is being tested?
- Mindfulness Meditation, Therapeutic Hypnosis and Story Listening
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 375 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 4 Mar 2026to 31 Aug 2029
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 60 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- be ≥60 years of age;
- have self-reported chronic pain (≥3-months, with pain experienced on ≥ 50% of days);
- endorse an average intensity of pain ≥3 on a 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS) for most days of the previous 3-months;
- be able to read, speak, and understand English;
- be naïve to meditation and hypnosis:
- never received formal training in or attended a mindfulness meditation or therapeutic hypnosis course;
Show all 13Show fewer
- have not practiced meditation (e.g., mindfulness meditation, Zen, Buddhism, or meditation applications such as certain types of CALM meditation; or therapeutic hypnosis (e.g., hypnosis applications) in the past 6-months;
- <20-min. practice/week of meditation or therapeutic hypnosis (not described above) over the past 6-months;
- if currently taking analgesic or psychotropic medication, medication must have been stabilized for ≥4-weeks prior to this study and does not anticipate changes in the medication during the study;
- access to a private place with adequate internet reception to support participation in intervention training sessions;
- not currently participating in another clinical trial or interventional study for chronic pain and willing to refrain from participation in any other clinical trial or interventional study for chronic pain during active participation in this study;
- willing, able, and committed to participate in an in-person EEG, and two MRI/fMRI scans; and
- able to use an electronic device (e.g., smart phone, tablet, computer) independently to access email and webpages or have someone available in their home who can help them with initial session set-up and then leave for the treatment sessions.
Who cannot join
- have a history of a medical condition that could produce an abnormal EEG (e.g., epilepsy, history of traumatic brain injury);
- have an EEG confounder (e.g., congenital or acquired skull defects, missing sections or holes in the skull, or plates, screws, or other implants within the skull or brain) that would interfere with reliable EEG data collection;
- have metals in the body (e.g., pacemakers and/or cochlear implant) that are not allowed by IBIC MRI technicians;
- self-report claustrophobia or other contraindications to MRI scanning;
- have uncontrolled hypertension;
- have a primary chronic pain condition of headache;
Show all 14Show fewer
- have chronic pain due to malignancy (e.g., cancer) or a chronic pain condition for which surgery is recommended and/or planned;
- alcohol abuse (operationalized as scoring ≥5 (male) or ≥4 (female) and responds that they have three or more standard drinks on a typical day or they have six or more drinks on one occasion less than monthly or greater on the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-Concise (AUDIT-C), or any substance (drug) abuse, all of which may impact EEG measures.
- severe cognitive impairment defined as ≥2 errors on the 6-Item Cognitive Impairment test or show signs of cognitive impairment on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA, using demographically-adjusted normative cut-offs that take into account race, ethnicity, age, and educational attainment);
- currently receiving other psychosocial treatments for any pain condition (as this may influence these treatment results);
- self-report previous participation in an experimental pain study;
- report <2 on a 0-10 NRS for pain intensity in response to experimental "heat" pain stimuli (in order to avoid floor effects and to ensure participants are not too insensitive to thermal pain to reliably produce detectable pain-related brain activation);
- unstable medical or psychiatric condition (e.g., mania, psychotic symptoms) that would interfere with study participation; or
- active suicidal ideation/intent indicating significant risk.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United States1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
University of Washington
Seattle, Washington, 98104
Brianna Agnew, 844-481-3451, reframe-study@uw.edu
Emily Cornejo, 844-481-3451, reframe-study@uw.edu
About this study
The goal of this study is to better understand how two common psychological treatments for pain work in the brain of older adults living with chronic pain. This study will:
- evaluate fMRI of adults receiving psychological treatments for chronic pain to determine how these interventions work within older adults, and
- examine self-report and EEG variables to identify for whom do these psychological interventions work.
Adults ages 60 years and older, living with chronic pain for at least 3 months will be randomly assigned to one of three conditions:
- Mindfulness-Meditation
- Therapeutic Hypnosis
- Story Listening
Read the detailed description
Research has shown that psychological treatments can help people with chronic pain manage their pain and improve their quality of life. Two common psychological treatments for chronic pain include Mindfulness-Meditation and Therapeutic Hypnosis. While research has shown these treatments are helpful for people with chronic pain, the benefits people experience from these types of treatments can vary from person to person. There is little research showing who responds best to which treatments and what happens in the brain during these treatments to reduce pain. The purpose of this study is to better understand how these pain treatments work in the brain. By identifying how these pain treatments work to help reduce chronic pain, the study investigators aim to improve treatments for people with chronic pain in the future.
Participants will complete seven study sessions (three in-person at the University of Washington Medical Center and four remote (e.g., at-home)). Sessions will vary from 45 minutes to 2 hours. They will also be asked to complete four online surveys before they start the study sessions and four online surveys after they complete the study sessions.
- 3 in-person sessions: the study includes one session where participants will receive an electroencephalogram (EEG; to assess brain wave activity). It also includes two sessions where they will receive structural MRIs (to image their brain) and functional MRIs (to image their brain while they are at rest and while we test how they respond to heat stimulus). Participants will be asked questions about their quality of life and their pain.
- 4 remote (at-home) sessions: participants will be randomized to listen to recordings of Mindfulness Meditation, Therapeutic Hypnosis, or a story.
Participants will spend about 8 hours in this study over a 4-week period.
- Conditions
- Chronic Pain
- Being tested
- Mindfulness Meditation, Therapeutic Hypnosis, Story Listening
- Keywords
- Chronic Pain, Mindfulness Meditation, Therapeutic Hypnosis
- Medical subject headings
- Chronic Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Mindfulness MeditationBehavioural
The Mindfulness Meditation trainings will teach participants Shamatha Vipassana, which is the specific form of Mindfulness Meditation typically implemented in mindfulness research. The emphasis is placed upon developing focused attention on an object of awareness, such as the breath. This focus is then expanded to include a more open, non-judgmental monitoring of any sensory, emotional, or cognitive events. Participants will be invited to lie flat on their back (i.e., to mimic conditions in the MRI scanner) and will listen to a recorded Mindfulness Meditation script.
Therapeutic HypnosisBehavioural
In the Therapeutic Hypnosis group, participants will relax with their eyes closed and, as with Mindfulness Meditation, will lie flat on their lack and will listen to a recorded hypnotic script. The Therapeutic Hypnosis practice will include an induction followed by suggestions for decreased pain and improvement in comorbid symptoms (e.g., mood).
Story ListeningBehavioural
Participants will lie flat on their back and will listen to a recorded story from a natural history book.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Mindfulness Meditation | Experimental | Participants will lie flat on their back with their eyes closed and will listen to a recorded Mindfulness Meditation script. Receives: Behavioral: Mindfulness Meditation |
| Therapeutic Hypnosis | Experimental | Participants will lie flat on their back with their eyes closed and will listen to a recorded hypnotic script. Receives: Behavioral: Therapeutic Hypnosis |
| Story Listening | Experimental | Participants will lie flat on their back with their eyes closed and will listen to a recorded story from a natural history book. Receives: Behavioral: Story Listening |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in average chronic pain intensity in past 24 hours
Change in average chronic pain intensity in the past 24 hours will be measured using a 0-10 numerical rating scale. Participants will be asked to choose a number from 0-10 that best represents their chronic pain intensity in the past 24 hours. Higher scores indicate higher levels of self-reported pain intensity. The four daily assessments will be averaged and change scores will be calculated between pre- and post-treatment.
Measured: Collected daily for 4 consecutive days at pre-baseline, during EEG procedure, baseline MRI/fMRI assessment, at each of the 4 treatment sessions, 1-week post-baseline MRI, and daily for 4 consecutive days starting day 11 post-baseline MRI/fMRI assessment
Secondary outcomes (9)
Change in peak experiment-induced pain intensity
Change in pain intensity will be measured using a 0-10 numerical rating scale. Participants will be asked to choose a number from 0-10 that best represents their current pain intensity as assessed during the pain stimulus session; the question is asked at the point that pain tolerance is reached. Higher scores indicate higher levels of self-reported pain intensity.
Measured: Collected during EEG procedure, baseline MRI/fMRI assessment, and 1-week post-baseline MRI/fMRI assessment
Change in peak experiment-induced pain unpleasantness
Change in pain unpleasantness will be measured using a 0-10 numerical rating scale. Participants will be asked to choose a number from 0-10 that best represents their current pain unpleasantness as assessed during the pain stimulus session; the question is asked at the point that pain tolerance is reached. Higher scores indicate higher levels of self-reported pain unpleasantness.
Measured: Collected during EEG assessment visit, baseline MRI/fMRI assessment, and 1-week post-baseline MRI/fMRI assessment
Change in current pain intensity
Change in current pain intensity will be measured using a 0-10 numerical rating scale. Participants will be asked to choose a number from 0-10 that best represents their current pain intensity. Higher scores indicate higher levels of self-reported pain intensity.
Measured: Collected during EEG procedure, baseline MRI/fMRI assessment, and at 1-week post-baseline MRI/fMRI assessment
Change in current pain unpleasantness
Change in current pain unpleasantness will be measured using a 0-10 numerical rating scale. Participants will be asked to choose a number from 0-10 that best represents their current pain unpleasantness. Higher scores indicate higher levels of self-reported pain unpleasantness.
Measured: Collected during EEG assessment visit, baseline MRI/fMRI assessment, and at 1-week post-baseline MRI/fMRI assessment
Change in average chronic pain unpleasantness in past 24 hours
Change in average chronic pain unpleasantness in the past 24 hours will be measured using a 0-10 numerical rating scale. Participants will be asked to choose a number from 0-10 that best represents their chronic pain unpleasantness in the past 24 hours. Higher scores indicate higher levels of self-reported pain unpleasantness.
Measured: Collected daily for 4 consecutive days at pre-baseline, during EEG procedure, baseline MRI/fMRI assessment, at each of the 4 treatment sessions, 1-week post-baseline MRI, and daily for 4 consecutive days starting day 11 post-baseline MRI/fMRI assessment
Change in pain interference
Change in pain interference with different activities/aspects of life will be measured by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Interference 4-item short form. Responses from each item will be summed for a total raw score from 4-20. The raw scores are then converted to T-Scores, with a mean of 50 and a SD of 10. Higher scores indicate more self-reported pain interference with different activities/aspects of life.
Measured: Collected once at pre-baseline, and once on day 13 post-baseline MRI/fMRI assessment
Change in sleep disturbance
Change in sleep disturbance will be measured with the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Sleep Disturbance 4-item short form. Responses from each item will be summed to form a total raw score ranging from 4-20. The raw scores are then converted to T-Scores, with a mean of 50 and a SD of 10. Higher scores indicate more self-reported sleep disturbance.
Measured: Collected once at pre-baseline, and once on day 13 post-baseline MRI/fMRI assessment
Change in depression
Change in depression will be measured with the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Depression 4-item short form. Responses from each item will be summed to form a total raw score ranging from 4-20. The raw scores are then converted to T-Scores, with a mean of 50 and a SD of 10. Higher scores indicate higher self-reported levels of depression.
Measured: Collected once at pre-baseline, and once on day 13 post-baseline MRI/fMRI assessment
Change in fatigue
Change in fatigue will be measured with the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Fatigue 4-item short form. Responses from each item will be summed to form a total raw score ranging from 4-20. The raw scores are then converted to T-Scores, with a mean of 50 and a SD of 10. Higher scores indicate higher self-reported levels of fatigue.
Measured: Collected once at pre-baseline, and once on day 13 post-baseline MRI/fMRI assessment
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 May 2025
- Study start4 Mar 2026
- Primary completion1 Mar 2029 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Aug 2029 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Chronic PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of WashingtonThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 375 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Washington
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- The University of Queensland, University of Florida, University of California, San Diego, National Institute on Aging (NIA)
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Mark Jensen, University of Washington
- Investigators
- Mark Jensen, PhD, Principal investigator, University of WashingtonMelissa Day, PhD, Principal investigator, The University of Queensland
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06957743
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- STUDY00021167
- Other IDs
- R01AG079832-01
- Status last verified
- Jun 2026
- First submitted
- 10 Apr 2025
- Last updated
- 4 Jun 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: The self-report data and metadata will be archived in the Mendeley Data generalist repository. The EEG and fMRI data will be archived in the NeuroImaging Tools \& Resources Collaboratory Image Repository (NTRC-IR), which is a NIH-sponsored repository for neuroimaging data.
Publications
Jensen MP, Patterson DR. Hypnotic approaches for chronic pain management: clinical implications of recent research findings. Am Psychol. 2014 Feb-Mar;69(2):167-77. doi: 10.1037/a0035644.
PubMed 24547802Patterson DR, Jensen MP. Hypnosis and clinical pain. Psychol Bull. 2003 Jul;129(4):495-521. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.129.4.495.
PubMed 12848218Jensen MP, Mendoza ME, Ehde DM, Patterson DR, Molton IR, Dillworth TM, Gertz KJ, Chan J, Hakimian S, Battalio SL, Ciol MA. Effects of hypnosis, cognitive therapy, hypnotic cognitive therapy, and pain education in adults with chronic pain: a randomized clinical trial. Pain. 2020 Oct;161(10):2284-2298. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001943.
PubMed 32483058Day MA, Ehde DM, Burns J, Ward LC, Friedly JL, Thorn BE, Ciol MA, Mendoza E, Chan JF, Battalio S, Borckardt J, Jensen MP. A randomized trial to examine the mechanisms of cognitive, behavioral and mindfulness-based psychosocial treatments for chronic pain: Study protocol. Contemp Clin Trials. 2020 Jun;93:106000. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2020.106000. Epub 2020 Apr 14.
PubMed 32302791Day MA, Ciol MA, Mendoza ME, Borckardt J, Ehde DM, Newman AK, Chan JF, Drever SA, Friedly JL, Burns J, Thorn BE, Jensen MP. The effects of telehealth-delivered mindfulness meditation, cognitive therapy, and behavioral activation for chronic low back pain: a randomized clinical trial. BMC Med. 2024 Apr 12;22(1):156. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03383-2.
PubMed 38609994Morone NE, Greco CM, Moore CG, Rollman BL, Lane B, Morrow LA, Glynn NW, Weiner DK. A Mind-Body Program for Older Adults With Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Mar;176(3):329-37. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.8033.
PubMed 26903081
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Jun 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Mechanisms of Mindfulness Meditation and Self-Hypnosis for Pain in Older Adults With Chronic Pain
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06957743
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- STUDY00021167
- Conditions
- Chronic Pain
- Keywords
- Chronic Pain, Mindfulness Meditation, Therapeutic Hypnosis
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 375 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of WashingtonUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- The University of Queensland, University of Florida, University of California, San Diego, National Institute on Aging (NIA)
- Study start
- 4 Mar 2026 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Mar 2029 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Aug 2029 (estimated)
- First posted
- 4 May 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this study is to better understand how two common psychological treatments for pain work in the brain of older adults living with chronic pain. This study will:
- evaluate fMRI of adults receiving psychological treatments for chronic pain to determine how these interventions work within older adults, and
- examine self-report and EEG variables to identify for whom do these psychological interventions work.
Adults ages 60 years and older, living with chronic pain for at least 3 months will be randomly assigned to one of three conditions:
- Mindfulness-Meditation
- Therapeutic Hypnosis
- Story Listening
Detailed description
Research has shown that psychological treatments can help people with chronic pain manage their pain and improve their quality of life. Two common psychological treatments for chronic pain include Mindfulness-Meditation and Therapeutic Hypnosis. While research has shown these treatments are helpful for people with chronic pain, the benefits people experience from these types of treatments can vary from person to person. There is little research showing who responds best to which treatments and what happens in the brain during these treatments to reduce pain. The purpose of this study is to better understand how these pain treatments work in the brain. By identifying how these pain treatments work to help reduce chronic pain, the study investigators aim to improve treatments for people with chronic pain in the future.
Participants will complete seven study sessions (three in-person at the University of Washington Medical Center and four remote (e.g., at-home)). Sessions will vary from 45 minutes to 2 hours. They will also be asked to complete four online surveys before they start the study sessions and four online surveys after they complete the study sessions.
- 3 in-person sessions: the study includes one session where participants will receive an electroencephalogram (EEG; to assess brain wave activity). It also includes two sessions where they will receive structural MRIs (to image their brain) and functional MRIs (to image their brain while they are at rest and while we test how they respond to heat stimulus). Participants will be asked questions about their quality of life and their pain.
- 4 remote (at-home) sessions: participants will be randomized to listen to recordings of Mindfulness Meditation, Therapeutic Hypnosis, or a story.
Participants will spend about 8 hours in this study over a 4-week period.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Mindfulness Meditation | Experimental | Behavioral: Mindfulness MeditationParticipants will lie flat on their back with their eyes closed and will listen to a recorded Mindfulness Meditation script. |
| Therapeutic Hypnosis | Experimental | Behavioral: Therapeutic HypnosisParticipants will lie flat on their back with their eyes closed and will listen to a recorded hypnotic script. |
| Story Listening | Experimental | Behavioral: Story ListeningParticipants will lie flat on their back with their eyes closed and will listen to a recorded story from a natural history book. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 60 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (13 listed)
- be ≥60 years of age;
- have self-reported chronic pain (≥3-months, with pain experienced on ≥ 50% of days);
- endorse an average intensity of pain ≥3 on a 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS) for most days of the previous 3-months;
- be able to read, speak, and understand English;
- be naïve to meditation and hypnosis:
Key exclusion criteria (14 listed)
- have a history of a medical condition that could produce an abnormal EEG (e.g., epilepsy, history of traumatic brain injury);
- have an EEG confounder (e.g., congenital or acquired skull defects, missing sections or holes in the skull, or plates, screws, or other implants within the skull or brain) that would interfere with reliable EEG data collection;
- have metals in the body (e.g., pacemakers and/or cochlear implant) that are not allowed by IBIC MRI technicians;
- self-report claustrophobia or other contraindications to MRI scanning;
- have uncontrolled hypertension;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Mindfulness MeditationThe Mindfulness Meditation trainings will teach participants Shamatha Vipassana, which is the specific form of Mindfulness Meditation typically implemented in mindfulness research. The emphasis is placed upon developing focused attention on an object of awareness, such as the breath. This focus is then expanded to include a more open, non-judgmental monitoring of any sensory, emotional, or cognitive events. Participants will be invited to lie flat on their back (i.e., to mimic conditions in the MRI scanner) and will listen to a recorded Mindfulness Meditation script. | Behavioural | Mindfulness Meditation |
| Therapeutic HypnosisIn the Therapeutic Hypnosis group, participants will relax with their eyes closed and, as with Mindfulness Meditation, will lie flat on their lack and will listen to a recorded hypnotic script. The Therapeutic Hypnosis practice will include an induction followed by suggestions for decreased pain and improvement in comorbid symptoms (e.g., mood). | Behavioural | Therapeutic Hypnosis |
| Story ListeningParticipants will lie flat on their back and will listen to a recorded story from a natural history book. | Behavioural | Story Listening |
Primary outcome
Change in average chronic pain intensity in past 24 hours
Time frame: Collected daily for 4 consecutive days at pre-baseline, during EEG procedure, baseline MRI/fMRI assessment, at each of the 4 treatment sessions, 1-week post-baseline MRI, and daily for 4 consecutive days starting day 11 post-baseline MRI/fMRI assessment
Change in average chronic pain intensity in the past 24 hours will be measured using a 0-10 numerical rating scale. Participants will be asked to choose a number from 0-10 that best represents their chronic pain intensity in the past 24 hours. Higher scores indicate higher levels of self-reported pain intensity. The four daily assessments will be averaged and change scores will be calculated between pre- and post-treatment.
9 secondary outcomes
Change in peak experiment-induced pain intensity
Time frame: Collected during EEG procedure, baseline MRI/fMRI assessment, and 1-week post-baseline MRI/fMRI assessment
Change in peak experiment-induced pain unpleasantness
Time frame: Collected during EEG assessment visit, baseline MRI/fMRI assessment, and 1-week post-baseline MRI/fMRI assessment
Change in current pain intensity
Time frame: Collected during EEG procedure, baseline MRI/fMRI assessment, and at 1-week post-baseline MRI/fMRI assessment
Change in current pain unpleasantness
Time frame: Collected during EEG assessment visit, baseline MRI/fMRI assessment, and at 1-week post-baseline MRI/fMRI assessment
Change in average chronic pain unpleasantness in past 24 hours
Time frame: Collected daily for 4 consecutive days at pre-baseline, during EEG procedure, baseline MRI/fMRI assessment, at each of the 4 treatment sessions, 1-week post-baseline MRI, and daily for 4 consecutive days starting day 11 post-baseline MRI/fMRI assessment
Change in pain interference
Time frame: Collected once at pre-baseline, and once on day 13 post-baseline MRI/fMRI assessment
Change in sleep disturbance
Time frame: Collected once at pre-baseline, and once on day 13 post-baseline MRI/fMRI assessment
Change in depression
Time frame: Collected once at pre-baseline, and once on day 13 post-baseline MRI/fMRI assessment
Change in fatigue
Time frame: Collected once at pre-baseline, and once on day 13 post-baseline MRI/fMRI assessment
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Jun 2026.
- Background: PubMed 24547802Jensen MP, Patterson DR. Hypnotic approaches for chronic pain management: clinical implications of recent research findings. Am Psychol. 2014 Feb-Mar;69(2):167-77. doi: 10.1037/a0035644.
- Background: PubMed 12848218Patterson DR, Jensen MP. Hypnosis and clinical pain. Psychol Bull. 2003 Jul;129(4):495-521. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.129.4.495.
- Background: PubMed 32483058Jensen MP, Mendoza ME, Ehde DM, Patterson DR, Molton IR, Dillworth TM, Gertz KJ, Chan J, Hakimian S, Battalio SL, Ciol MA. Effects of hypnosis, cognitive therapy, hypnotic cognitive therapy, and pain education in adults with chronic pain: a randomized clinical trial. Pain. 2020 Oct;161(10):2284-2298. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001943.
- Background: PubMed 32302791Day MA, Ehde DM, Burns J, Ward LC, Friedly JL, Thorn BE, Ciol MA, Mendoza E, Chan JF, Battalio S, Borckardt J, Jensen MP. A randomized trial to examine the mechanisms of cognitive, behavioral and mindfulness-based psychosocial treatments for chronic pain: Study protocol. Contemp Clin Trials. 2020 Jun;93:106000. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2020.106000. Epub 2020 Apr 14.
- Background: PubMed 38609994Day MA, Ciol MA, Mendoza ME, Borckardt J, Ehde DM, Newman AK, Chan JF, Drever SA, Friedly JL, Burns J, Thorn BE, Jensen MP. The effects of telehealth-delivered mindfulness meditation, cognitive therapy, and behavioral activation for chronic low back pain: a randomized clinical trial. BMC Med. 2024 Apr 12;22(1):156. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03383-2.
- Background: PubMed 26903081Morone NE, Greco CM, Moore CG, Rollman BL, Lane B, Morrow LA, Glynn NW, Weiner DK. A Mind-Body Program for Older Adults With Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Mar;176(3):329-37. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.8033.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. The self-report data and metadata will be archived in the Mendeley Data generalist repository. The EEG and fMRI data will be archived in the NeuroImaging Tools \& Resources Collaboratory Image Repository (NTRC-IR), which is a NIH-sponsored repository for neuroimaging data.
Related trials for Chronic Pain
Recruiting
Empowered Relief® for Cancer Survivors With Chronic Pain
Chronic Pain Due to Cancer, Pain Catastrophizing
RecruitingObservational study
Pain Phenotypes in Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Lumbar Stabilization Exercises With and Without YTWL (Scapular Stabilization Exercises) on Reducing Chronic Low Back Pain and Related Disability. A Randomized Clinical Trial,
Chronic Non Specific Mechanical Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Comparing Non-Medicine Strategies for Improving Low Back Pain
Chronic Low-back Pain (cLBP), High-Impact Chronic Pain (HICP)
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Pectoral Nerve Block (PECS) Using Magnesium Sulfate Added to Dexamethasone on Quality of Recovery and Chronic Post-Mastectomy Pain
Breast Cancer, Postoperative Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Mark Jensen, PhD principal investigator
University of Washington
Melissa Day, PhD principal investigator
The University of Queensland
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Mindfulness Meditation, Therapeutic Hypnosis and Story Listening in people with Chronic Pain, run by University of Washington at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 13 inclusion and 14 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Rana Salem, MA (206-543-0107, rsalem@uw.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in average chronic pain intensity in past 24 hours (time frame: Collected daily for 4 consecutive days at pre-baseline, during EEG procedure, baseline MRI/fMRI assessment, at each of the 4 treatment sessions, 1-week post-baseline MRI, and daily for 4 consecutive days starting day 11 post-baseline MRI/fMRI assessment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06957743, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Jun 2026.