Chronic PainNCT07016581
Optimal Duration of Spinal Cord Stimulation Trial Procedure: Length and Diagnostic Accuracy
An observational study of Chronic Pain, run by University of Maryland, Baltimore at 4 sites in United States.
Trial summary
This study aims to find out the optimal duration (in days) needed for a spinal cord stimulator (SCS) trial procedure for treating chronic pain. While shorter trial periods could lower risks like infections or bleeding (especially for patients who need to stop blood thinners), patients also need sufficient time to… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Chronic Pain
- What is being tested?
- Daily survey
- How many people
- 100 participants
- Where
- 4 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 5 Jun 2023to Dec 2026
- How long will I take part?
- 2 Weeks
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Adult patients with chronic pain undergoing an spinal cord stimulation trial procedure to assess for candidacy for permanent implantation of an spinal cord stimulation device.
Who may be able to join
- Age >18 years old, with capacity for study consent
- Clinical evidence of a chronic pain condition amenable for treatment with spinal cord stimulation
- Chronic pain duration >12 weeks
Who cannot join
- Pregnancy
- Worker's compensation status
- Previously failed spinal cord stimulation trial
- Chronic opioid use with >50 morphine milligram equivalents
Trial locations and contacts
4 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United States4 sites
University of Maryland
Baltimore, Maryland, 21231
Ohio State University
Columbus, Ohio, 43210
MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas, 77030
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905
About this study
This study aims to find out the optimal duration (in days) needed for a spinal cord stimulator (SCS) trial procedure for treating chronic pain. While shorter trial periods could lower risks like infections or bleeding (especially for patients who need to stop blood thinners), patients also need sufficient time to achieve meaningful pain and function relief, and to report willingness to proceed to permanent implantation. Unfortunately, the optimal duration of an SCS trial procedure is not currently known. We aim to explore this optimal duration across a multi-center study by studying daily surveys completed across the duration of SCS trial procedures.
Read the detailed description
Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a well-established therapy for chronic pain. However before one can proceed with SCS as a permanent therapy, they must undergo an antecedent SCS trial procedure to assess its effectiveness as a treatment for the patient's pain. The SCS trial procedure involves the percutaneous placement of leads with electrical contacts into the epidural space.
Given the infectious risks associated with an SCS trial, including those associated with significant morbidity and mortality, the typical duration of an SCS trial procedure ranges from 3 to 14 days. Additionally, given the risks for epidural hematoma formation, patients on certain anti-platelet and anti-coagulant medications require medication cessation prior to and across the SCS trial duration. In these scenarios, prolonging the withholding of these medications can place these patients at serious risks for serious embolic and/or vascular events. However, while reducing the duration an SCS trial procedure may help mitigate the risks for serious infectious and embolic and/or vascular events, patients with chronic pain conditions may typically need several days to achieve and report meaningful analgesic and functional responses and willingness to proceed with a permanent SCS implantation procedure. However, the optimal duration required for an SCS trial response has yet to be clearly established.
In this study, we aim to explore the optimal duration of the SCS trial procedure and assess how daily pain levels and patient satisfaction impact the decision to permanently implant a SCS device. The primary objective is to determine the optimal number of days required to accurately predict SCS trial procedure outcomes.
This prospective, multi-center study will enroll a target of 100 patients undergoing an SCS trial procedure (conducted in accordance to standard clinical practices per site). In addition to demographics, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores, SCS e-health tool recommendations, and key SCS parameters, patients will complete daily surveys to assess their analgesic and functional benefit across the duration of the SCS trial. Analyses will be performed to determine: 1) the number of days it takes to define final trial outcomes (for positive responders and not-positive responders); 2) if and how PROMIS domains correlate with days to define final trial outcomes; and 3) if and how SCS e-health tool recommendations correlate with days to define final trial outcomes.
- Conditions
- Chronic Pain
- Being tested
- Daily survey
- Keywords
- spinal cord stimulation, spinal cord stimulation trial
- Medical subject headings
- Chronic Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Daily surveyDiagnostic test
All patients undergoing an spinal cord stimulation trial procedure (which will be conducted in accordance to standard clinical practices per site) will be given daily surveys to assess their analgesic and functional benefit.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Study Cohort | Adult patients with chronic pain undergoing an spinal cord stimulation trial procedure Receives: Diagnostic Test: Daily survey |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Days to Achieve Response to Spinal Cord Stimulation Trial Procedure
minimum number of days required to accurately predict spinal cord stimulation trial outcomes (positive or negative)
Measured: 3-14 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Jun 2025
- Study start5 Jun 2023
- Primary completionDec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Chronic PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of Maryland, BaltimoreThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
- Target duration
- 2 Weeks
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Maryland, Baltimore
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Mayo Clinic, Ohio State University, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Jay Karri, University of Maryland, Baltimore
- Investigators
- Jay Karri, MD, MPH, Principal investigator, University of MarylandRyan D'Souza, MD, Principal investigator, Mayo Clinic
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07016581
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HP-00113001
- Status last verified
- Aug 2026
- First submitted
- 4 Jun 2025
- Last updated
- 4 Aug 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Aug 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Optimal Duration of Spinal Cord Stimulation Trial Procedure: Length and Diagnostic Accuracy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07016581
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HP-00113001
- Conditions
- Chronic Pain
- Keywords
- spinal cord stimulation, spinal cord stimulation trial
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Enrolling by invitation
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Maryland, BaltimoreUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Mayo Clinic, Ohio State University, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
- Study start
- 5 Jun 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 11 Jun 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study aims to find out the optimal duration (in days) needed for a spinal cord stimulator (SCS) trial procedure for treating chronic pain. While shorter trial periods could lower risks like infections or bleeding (especially for patients who need to stop blood thinners), patients also need sufficient time to achieve meaningful pain and function relief, and to report willingness to proceed to permanent implantation. Unfortunately, the optimal duration of an SCS trial procedure is not currently known. We aim to explore this optimal duration across a multi-center study by studying daily surveys completed across the duration of SCS trial procedures.
Detailed description
Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a well-established therapy for chronic pain. However before one can proceed with SCS as a permanent therapy, they must undergo an antecedent SCS trial procedure to assess its effectiveness as a treatment for the patient's pain. The SCS trial procedure involves the percutaneous placement of leads with electrical contacts into the epidural space.
Given the infectious risks associated with an SCS trial, including those associated with significant morbidity and mortality, the typical duration of an SCS trial procedure ranges from 3 to 14 days. Additionally, given the risks for epidural hematoma formation, patients on certain anti-platelet and anti-coagulant medications require medication cessation prior to and across the SCS trial duration. In these scenarios, prolonging the withholding of these medications can place these patients at serious risks for serious embolic and/or vascular events. However, while reducing the duration an SCS trial procedure may help mitigate the risks for serious infectious and embolic and/or vascular events, patients with chronic pain conditions may typically need several days to achieve and report meaningful analgesic and functional responses and willingness to proceed with a permanent SCS implantation procedure. However, the optimal duration required for an SCS trial response has yet to be clearly established.
In this study, we aim to explore the optimal duration of the SCS trial procedure and assess how daily pain levels and patient satisfaction impact the decision to permanently implant a SCS device. The primary objective is to determine the optimal number of days required to accurately predict SCS trial procedure outcomes.
This prospective, multi-center study will enroll a target of 100 patients undergoing an SCS trial procedure (conducted in accordance to standard clinical practices per site). In addition to demographics, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores, SCS e-health tool recommendations, and key SCS parameters, patients will complete daily surveys to assess their analgesic and functional benefit across the duration of the SCS trial. Analyses will be performed to determine: 1) the number of days it takes to define final trial outcomes (for positive responders and not-positive responders); 2) if and how PROMIS domains correlate with days to define final trial outcomes; and 3) if and how SCS e-health tool recommendations correlate with days to define final trial outcomes.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Target follow-up
- 2 Weeks
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Study Cohort | – | Diagnostic Test: Daily surveyAdult patients with chronic pain undergoing an spinal cord stimulation trial procedure |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Adult patients with chronic pain undergoing an spinal cord stimulation trial procedure to assess for candidacy for permanent implantation of an spinal cord stimulation device.
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Age >18 years old, with capacity for study consent
- Clinical evidence of a chronic pain condition amenable for treatment with spinal cord stimulation
- Chronic pain duration >12 weeks
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Pregnancy
- Worker's compensation status
- Previously failed spinal cord stimulation trial
- Chronic opioid use with >50 morphine milligram equivalents
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Daily surveyAll patients undergoing an spinal cord stimulation trial procedure (which will be conducted in accordance to standard clinical practices per site) will be given daily surveys to assess their analgesic and functional benefit. | Diagnostic test | Study Cohort |
Primary outcome
Days to Achieve Response to Spinal Cord Stimulation Trial Procedure
Time frame: 3-14 days
minimum number of days required to accurately predict spinal cord stimulation trial outcomes (positive or negative)
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Aug 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Chronic Pain
Recruiting
Empowered Relief® for Cancer Survivors With Chronic Pain
Chronic Pain Due to Cancer, Pain Catastrophizing
RecruitingObservational study
Pain Phenotypes in Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Lumbar Stabilization Exercises With and Without YTWL (Scapular Stabilization Exercises) on Reducing Chronic Low Back Pain and Related Disability. A Randomized Clinical Trial,
Chronic Non Specific Mechanical Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Comparing Non-Medicine Strategies for Improving Low Back Pain
Chronic Low-back Pain (cLBP), High-Impact Chronic Pain (HICP)
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Pectoral Nerve Block (PECS) Using Magnesium Sulfate Added to Dexamethasone on Quality of Recovery and Chronic Post-Mastectomy Pain
Breast Cancer, Postoperative Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Jay Karri, MD, MPH principal investigator
University of Maryland
Ryan D'Souza, MD principal investigator
Mayo Clinic
4 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Chronic Pain, run by University of Maryland, Baltimore at 4 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: enrolling by invitation, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 4 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Days to Achieve Response to Spinal Cord Stimulation Trial Procedure (time frame: 3-14 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Aug 2026.